<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/10-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eenzijdige backlinks</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-646240</link>
		<dc:creator>eenzijdige backlinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 10:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-646240</guid>
		<description>You made some decent points there. I seemed on the internet for the problem and located most individuals will associate with along with your website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made some decent points there. I seemed on the internet for the problem and located most individuals will associate with along with your website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelina Fuesting</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-620419</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelina Fuesting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-620419</guid>
		<description>I think this game is one of the best pc games I have playd  so far. It is because of the cool visual effects. But unfortunaly no pc game is better than Assassins Creed 2 on playstation,  so I am returning to the  now ^^ In some days my brother will borrow me this game once more, so maybe I will return to my pc then :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this game is one of the best pc games I have playd  so far. It is because of the cool visual effects. But unfortunaly no pc game is better than Assassins Creed 2 on playstation,  so I am returning to the  now ^^ In some days my brother will borrow me this game once more, so maybe I will return to my pc then <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580939</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580939</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very grisly. In  WeHo we had power outages Sunday, and now GW Bush is in the area. It can&#039;t get much worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very grisly. In  WeHo we had power outages Sunday, and now GW Bush is in the area. It can&#8217;t get much worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580857</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580857</guid>
		<description>oops - nothing...then doubles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops &#8211; nothing&#8230;then doubles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580852</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580852</guid>
		<description>Marc -- Hope your end of the city is OK.  These fires in So. Cal. tonight, blow.  Literately.   We can smell the smoke that is torching Malibu and the canyons all the way down here in San Pedro (LA Harbor).  It&#039;s stuck in the marine layer.  Sinister sunset.

Tomorrow is going to grisly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc &#8212; Hope your end of the city is OK.  These fires in So. Cal. tonight, blow.  Literately.   We can smell the smoke that is torching Malibu and the canyons all the way down here in San Pedro (LA Harbor).  It&#8217;s stuck in the marine layer.  Sinister sunset.</p>
<p>Tomorrow is going to grisly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580850</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580850</guid>
		<description>great piece!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great piece!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580846</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580846</guid>
		<description>Disagree - pie-in-the-sky platitudes unless and until you folks who happen to be Third Party afficianados have something to show the rest of us.  I agree that local independent political action is a great antidote to machines - but overall, outside of Bernie Sanders who comes from a unique political envirionment and is a de facto Democrat, whether he likes to admit it or not (has the Dem imprimatur, caucuses with Dems and will probably support whoever the Dem nominee is for President as the pragmatic choice for &quot;socialists&quot; like himself (left-liberal social democrats with a nostalgic twist) - you&#039;ve got nuthin&#039;.  Except Bush&#039;s ascension in 2004 with that extra little lift from Ralph. 

It&#039;s not so much that I disagree.  I just am not interested in what is obviously well-intentioned rhetoric that&#039;s backed up by precisely nothing you can show me. I can show you a whole bunch of liberal Dems who are actively progressive - almost as good as Bernie - despite their being a minority even in their own party.  They have a hell of a lot more influence and exposure than the Greens are EVER going to get in our particular electoral (non-parliamentary) environment.   Put your energy in some sort of electoral reform that gives 3rd parties some tangible possiblity of effecting change. In the current structure, it&#039;s about as likely to happen as space aliens coming to save us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disagree &#8211; pie-in-the-sky platitudes unless and until you folks who happen to be Third Party afficianados have something to show the rest of us.  I agree that local independent political action is a great antidote to machines &#8211; but overall, outside of Bernie Sanders who comes from a unique political envirionment and is a de facto Democrat, whether he likes to admit it or not (has the Dem imprimatur, caucuses with Dems and will probably support whoever the Dem nominee is for President as the pragmatic choice for &#8220;socialists&#8221; like himself (left-liberal social democrats with a nostalgic twist) &#8211; you&#8217;ve got nuthin&#8217;.  Except Bush&#8217;s ascension in 2004 with that extra little lift from Ralph. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not so much that I disagree.  I just am not interested in what is obviously well-intentioned rhetoric that&#8217;s backed up by precisely nothing you can show me. I can show you a whole bunch of liberal Dems who are actively progressive &#8211; almost as good as Bernie &#8211; despite their being a minority even in their own party.  They have a hell of a lot more influence and exposure than the Greens are EVER going to get in our particular electoral (non-parliamentary) environment.   Put your energy in some sort of electoral reform that gives 3rd parties some tangible possiblity of effecting change. In the current structure, it&#8217;s about as likely to happen as space aliens coming to save us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580845</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580845</guid>
		<description>Disagree - pie-in-the-sky platitudes unless and until you folks who happen to be Third Party afficianados have something to show the rest of us.  I agree that local independent political action is a great antidote to machines - but overall, outside of Bernie Sanders who comes from a unique political envirionment and is a de facto Democrat, whether he likes to admit it or not (has the Dem imprimatur, caucuses with Dems and will probably support whoever the Dem nominee is for President as the pragmatic choice for &quot;socialists&quot; like himself (left-liberal social democrats with a nostalgic twist) - you&#039;ve got nuthin&#039;.  Except Bush&#039;s ascension in 2004 with that extra little lift from Ralph. 

It&#039;s not so much that I disagree.  I just am not interested in what is obviously well-intentioned rhetoric that&#039;s backed up by precisely nothing you can show me. I can show you a whole bunch of liberal Dems who are actively progressive - almost as good as Bernie - despite their being a minority even in their own party.  They have a hell of a lot more influence and exposure than the Greens are EVER going to get in our particular electoral (non-pariliamentary) environment.   Put your energy in some sort of electoral reform that gives 3rd parties some tangible possiblity of effecting change. In the current structure, it&#039;s about as likely to happen as space aliens coming to save us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disagree &#8211; pie-in-the-sky platitudes unless and until you folks who happen to be Third Party afficianados have something to show the rest of us.  I agree that local independent political action is a great antidote to machines &#8211; but overall, outside of Bernie Sanders who comes from a unique political envirionment and is a de facto Democrat, whether he likes to admit it or not (has the Dem imprimatur, caucuses with Dems and will probably support whoever the Dem nominee is for President as the pragmatic choice for &#8220;socialists&#8221; like himself (left-liberal social democrats with a nostalgic twist) &#8211; you&#8217;ve got nuthin&#8217;.  Except Bush&#8217;s ascension in 2004 with that extra little lift from Ralph. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not so much that I disagree.  I just am not interested in what is obviously well-intentioned rhetoric that&#8217;s backed up by precisely nothing you can show me. I can show you a whole bunch of liberal Dems who are actively progressive &#8211; almost as good as Bernie &#8211; despite their being a minority even in their own party.  They have a hell of a lot more influence and exposure than the Greens are EVER going to get in our particular electoral (non-pariliamentary) environment.   Put your energy in some sort of electoral reform that gives 3rd parties some tangible possiblity of effecting change. In the current structure, it&#8217;s about as likely to happen as space aliens coming to save us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Walker</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580840</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580840</guid>
		<description>The problem is that Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards and most of the best and brightest political leaders in this country are enslaved by the idiocies of Democratic-Republican politics. 

I say this not just because of the failures of the Democrats in Washington, but especially because of their failures right here in California.  See my Op-Ed posted to the Los Angeles Times Web Site at: 

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-walker22oct22,0,6131751.story?coll=la-promo-opinion 

Agree or disagree?  Leave a comment

Alex Walker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards and most of the best and brightest political leaders in this country are enslaved by the idiocies of Democratic-Republican politics. </p>
<p>I say this not just because of the failures of the Democrats in Washington, but especially because of their failures right here in California.  See my Op-Ed posted to the Los Angeles Times Web Site at: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-walker22oct22,0,6131751.story?coll=la-promo-opinion" rel="nofollow">http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-walker22oct22,0,6131751.story?coll=la-promo-opinion</a> </p>
<p>Agree or disagree?  Leave a comment</p>
<p>Alex Walker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bunkerbuster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580832</link>
		<dc:creator>bunkerbuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 08:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580832</guid>
		<description>Whatever you do, don&#039;t mention Palestine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you do, don&#8217;t mention Palestine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580828</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580828</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been watching this 10Questions site for a few days now, maybe it&#039;s too early to say anything about patterns, but here&#039;s what I see:

Votes at this site reflect (and therefore conflate) three or four independent variables:

(1) How important is the question to the viewers?
(2) How well do viewers feel the asker has presented the question?
(3) How much does the viewer agree with the implied or expressed message of the video?
(3) How much patience does the viewer have left?

The current leader, by a mile, is someone raising concerns about warrantless wiretapping.  There is none of the narcissism and rambling of some of the other videos.  Instead of doing the recording at home, she went the extra mile and did it in front of the corporate offices of a telecom company.  Nice move: make it concrete.  As an amateur letter-to-the-editor/op-ed, it shines.

But is warrantless wiretapping really the biggest issue in the minds of American voters?  I don&#039;t think so.  How does it rank next to health care, or Iraq?  It&#039;s low.  There are videos at this site raising Iraq as an issue, but some of them are being voted way down, and I think for being intolerably gimmicky or heavyhanded.

Now, once you&#039;ve watched the currently leading video, then watched a few others to get the drift, how much time (really, patience) do you have left?  Not much.

I recommend breaking the videos out into categories, like The War, Health Care, The Economy, Immigration, Terrorism, Privacy, Entitlements, Taxes, the Latent Fascism Inherent in Trying to Prevent Me from Fileswapping, What&#039;s Your Favorite Food/Color/Music Genre/Kitty Litter, and whatever else (solicit new categories from users).  Locate navigation among the categories near the top, &quot;above the fold&quot;, so that viewers can more easily choose and evaluate video contributions on topics of greater interest to them.  This would save time for the viewers, it would give each category of issue its due, and it would allow viewers to more easily vote on which questioner really represents how they want a given question to be asked.

It&#039;s not a bad concept, really -- it just needs to be organized a little better from a usability point of view.  (As with so many sites out there.  *Sigh*.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been watching this 10Questions site for a few days now, maybe it&#8217;s too early to say anything about patterns, but here&#8217;s what I see:</p>
<p>Votes at this site reflect (and therefore conflate) three or four independent variables:</p>
<p>(1) How important is the question to the viewers?<br />
(2) How well do viewers feel the asker has presented the question?<br />
(3) How much does the viewer agree with the implied or expressed message of the video?<br />
(3) How much patience does the viewer have left?</p>
<p>The current leader, by a mile, is someone raising concerns about warrantless wiretapping.  There is none of the narcissism and rambling of some of the other videos.  Instead of doing the recording at home, she went the extra mile and did it in front of the corporate offices of a telecom company.  Nice move: make it concrete.  As an amateur letter-to-the-editor/op-ed, it shines.</p>
<p>But is warrantless wiretapping really the biggest issue in the minds of American voters?  I don&#8217;t think so.  How does it rank next to health care, or Iraq?  It&#8217;s low.  There are videos at this site raising Iraq as an issue, but some of them are being voted way down, and I think for being intolerably gimmicky or heavyhanded.</p>
<p>Now, once you&#8217;ve watched the currently leading video, then watched a few others to get the drift, how much time (really, patience) do you have left?  Not much.</p>
<p>I recommend breaking the videos out into categories, like The War, Health Care, The Economy, Immigration, Terrorism, Privacy, Entitlements, Taxes, the Latent Fascism Inherent in Trying to Prevent Me from Fileswapping, What&#8217;s Your Favorite Food/Color/Music Genre/Kitty Litter, and whatever else (solicit new categories from users).  Locate navigation among the categories near the top, &#8220;above the fold&#8221;, so that viewers can more easily choose and evaluate video contributions on topics of greater interest to them.  This would save time for the viewers, it would give each category of issue its due, and it would allow viewers to more easily vote on which questioner really represents how they want a given question to be asked.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a bad concept, really &#8212; it just needs to be organized a little better from a usability point of view.  (As with so many sites out there.  *Sigh*.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Listener</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580825</link>
		<dc:creator>Listener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580825</guid>
		<description>Oops.  A stiletto into Rachel Sklars of the &lt;i&gt;Huffington Post&lt;/i&gt;, courtesy of Scott Horton of &lt;i&gt;Harper&#039;s Magazine&lt;/i&gt;:  &lt;strong&gt;When Critics Are Really Pumpkins&lt;/strong&gt; http://tinyurl.com/yq2l4r  

I&#039;m with Scott on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.  A stiletto into Rachel Sklars of the <i>Huffington Post</i>, courtesy of Scott Horton of <i>Harper&#8217;s Magazine</i>:  <strong>When Critics Are Really Pumpkins</strong> <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yq2l4r" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yq2l4r</a>  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Scott on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Didn't Say Simon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580824</link>
		<dc:creator>I Didn't Say Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 23:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580824</guid>
		<description>I agree with what Simon says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with what Simon says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580818</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 20:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580818</guid>
		<description>Great concept, I have no doubt the candidates will completely ingore it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great concept, I have no doubt the candidates will completely ingore it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580793</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580793</guid>
		<description>This could go either way..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could go either way..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580783</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580783</guid>
		<description>I think this girl&#039;s got the right way to put the issue of Social Security solvency: [from 10Questions]

http://tinyurl.com/3ynfdq

I&#039;m sure every overcoached candidate has, in the end, at 2AM before the debate day, protested just as petulantly to his/her political consultants as this little tyke does at the end.  AND gotten a similar response: &quot;This is how you do TV, honey.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this girl&#8217;s got the right way to put the issue of Social Security solvency: [from 10Questions]</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ynfdq" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3ynfdq</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure every overcoached candidate has, in the end, at 2AM before the debate day, protested just as petulantly to his/her political consultants as this little tyke does at the end.  AND gotten a similar response: &#8220;This is how you do TV, honey.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bradley</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580781</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580781</guid>
		<description>Good idea. Why will the candidates respond?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea. Why will the candidates respond?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/10-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-580780</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/10-questions/#comment-580780</guid>
		<description>Wow. Someone&#039;s got their thinking cap on.  Sounds like an excellent project.  Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Someone&#8217;s got their thinking cap on.  Sounds like an excellent project.  Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

