<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: A Few Good Scapegoats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353885</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&quot; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#039;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#039;re one in the same so naturally, that&#039;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#039;s textbook confirmation bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Wingnut world doesnâ€™t cut it.&#8221; Tee hee. The problem is they can&#8217;t tell the opinion page from the front page and the news sections. In Wingerville they&#8217;re one in the same so naturally, that&#8217;s projected onto the real newspapers. It&#8217;s textbook confirmation bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353818</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353818</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Lysenkositers: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Lysenkositers: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/08/washington/08polar.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353816</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353816</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say the TIMES is unbiased. Look what they did to Clinton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353701</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353701</guid>
		<description>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column - also a U.S. News commentator - was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#039;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of alternate realities, that origin of that Barone quote is, it turns out, an error at U.S. News.  A Bonnie Erbe column &#8211; also a U.S. News commentator &#8211; was mistakenly posted on their website under Barone&#8217;s name and picture.  Funny.  In some ways this is re-assuring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353678</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353678</guid>
		<description>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you need to learn the difference between alternate sources and an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353676</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353676</guid>
		<description>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#039;s no convincing you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rlc, if you are saying that the NY Times is unbiased, then there&#8217;s no convincing you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353666</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353666</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &quot;Scandal&quot; - guess they wanted to hide it!

Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right Woody. ITS so hard to find stories suggesting Dems might have problems. Why I would have had to peer all over page one of the NYT yesterday to find out that Barack Obama may have made (no make that lost) money on stock that was in a company owned by a supporter. No arrows pointed to this &#8220;Scandal&#8221; &#8211; guess they wanted to hide it!</p>
<p>Do you even bother to read anything but NEWSMAX?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353612</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353612</guid>
		<description>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#039;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg, conservatives have to rely on alternate sources because news that hurts the Democrats is typically not published or put on page H-12.  If there is a problem with credibility, it&#8217;s more with liberal press than conservative press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353538</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 19:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353538</guid>
		<description>&quot;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&quot;

Conservative columnist Michael Barone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The emerging scandal surrounding the dismissals of eight former U.S. attorneys should signify to American voters the depth, breadth, and permeation of corruption in the Bush administration.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservative columnist Michael Barone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353332</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353332</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &quot;firing&quot; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &quot;Whitewater pundits&quot; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#039;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, one of those links mentions nothing about the &#8220;firing&#8221; of the Reagan/Bush U.S. attorneys and another states that unnamed &#8220;Whitewater pundits&#8221; found something fishy in the firings because they took place a day BEFORE Vince Foster was strangled by Hillary with her bare hands and then shot in the head or whatever it is that happened to Foster.  This Newsmax stuff is just too bizarre.  You&#8217;re standards for reference are truly absurd.  You should think long and hard about the kind of crap you fill your head with and try to pass off on others.  Wingnut world doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353322</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353322</guid>
		<description>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#039;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &quot;convicting Republicans on rumor&quot;.   When I said &quot;case&quot; an investigation would do. But there&#039;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#039;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#039;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woody, you amaze me.  You&#8217;ve got nothing and you accuse us of &#8220;convicting Republicans on rumor&#8221;.   When I said &#8220;case&#8221; an investigation would do. But there&#8217;s nothing in those links you provided as regards any prosecutor in the cycle of Reagan/Bush era prosecutors being replaced, which as I noted is custom.  If it wasn&#8217;t, how come all of the prosecutors who&#8217;s resignations were pushed by Reno were Reagan/Bush appointees ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353259</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353259</guid>
		<description>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#039;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter, if Republicans say everyone does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it, then it&#8217;s clear that Democrats lie about what they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353257</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353257</guid>
		<description>reg wrote: &lt;i&gt;How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?&lt;/i&gt;  

reg, I&#039;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#039;s the real person.  It&#039;s your way of denying the truth.  

I didn&#039;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#039;t worth answering, then it doesn&#039;t work.

You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.

What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg wrote: <i>How about a prosecutorâ€™s name and a case ? Too difficultâ€¦or doesnâ€™t exist?</i>  </p>
<p>reg, I&#8217;m not playing one-hundred questions with you.  If I answered those, then you would want me to come back with the birth certificate of the prosecutor to prove that he&#8217;s the real person.  It&#8217;s your way of denying the truth.  </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say that anyone was being prosecuted.  I said that they were being investigated and I provided links.  If you want more information, look it up yourself.  If you are merely trying to win an argument by asking endless questions that aren&#8217;t worth answering, then it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>You guys convict Republicans based only on rumor.  At least there were legitimate investigations that I mentioned on Clinton friends and business deals before he fired the U.S. Attorneys.</p>
<p>What ever happened to your endless predictions that Karl Rove was going to prison?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Roper</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-353234</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Roper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-353234</guid>
		<description>Balter:  &lt;blockquote&gt;It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#039;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#039;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#039;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#039;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balter:<br />
<blockquote>It shouldnâ€™t be done by anyone, period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael, I sometimes agree with that statement, and sometimes disagree.  I have no idea why these attorney&#8217;s were fired other than what is claimed (and counter claimed).  I do know that when you work at the pleasure of anyone, this is a possibility for anyone when you take the job.  Whats the answer? Career US. Attys?  We already have career politicians and that doesn&#8217;t work well, and even though politicians work at the pleasure of the population, it doesn&#8217;t seem that many get fired very often.  Job protection?  I just don&#8217;t see it.  At the same time, there should be a few steps that one should have to take to terminate a US Atty other than because he works at the pleasure of the Prez.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352889</guid>
		<description>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#039;t be done by anyone, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans say everybody does it and Democrats say only Republicans do it. Both arguments miss the point and help to perpetuate it. It shouldn&#8217;t be done by anyone, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352591</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352591</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &quot;VA Mess&quot;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is - see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &quot;socialized Medicine&quot; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &quot;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&quot; to be &quot;Patient Advocates&quot;

Thanks a lot jim!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to mention this but there is so much news that its hard to get to all of it. Marc erred when he called the hospital scandal the &#8220;VA Mess&#8221;. Its the Military Hospitals and they are different. Actually the scandal there is just how good VA care is &#8211; see any number of reports. The problem is this flies in the face of Conservative dogma that &#8220;socialized Medicine&#8221; is bad for you. Hence they have limited it as much as possible and have over 600,000 vets waiting for care. And just the other day Jim Nicholson, head of the DVA, announce he was adding &#8220;100 gulf and Iraq War vets&#8221; to be &#8220;Patient Advocates&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks a lot jim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352584</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352584</guid>
		<description>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#039;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &quot;Duke&quot; Cunningham over you-know what.
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#039;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.

Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!

Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete Domenici has hired a lawyer. Lee Blalack of O&#8217;Meleveny and Myers. He represented Bill Frist over SEC charges of insider dealings and &#8220;Duke&#8221; Cunningham over you-know what.<br />
And it now turns out that the former head of the House Ethics Committee (!) wrote to the AG asking him to fire the Washington state USA because the latter refused to prosecute over the 2004 Governor&#8217;s race that the GOP claimed had voter fraud.</p>
<p>Oh, and there seems to be another little matter. Employees at the GSA were told not to let contracts to non-Bush supporters!</p>
<p>Question: Are there any honest people in this Administration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fiore</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352565</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fiore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352565</guid>
		<description>The problem for conservatives is they&#039;ve waved the &quot;Everybody Does It&quot; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#039;s just a dirty little stick.

Anyway, we&#039;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &quot;He&#039;s no dirtier than Clinton.&quot;  Some recommendation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for conservatives is they&#8217;ve waved the &#8220;Everybody Does It&#8221; wand so many times that all the sparkles have fallen off it.  Now it&#8217;s just a dirty little stick.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;ve now found the very highest level of defense of Bush conservatives can offer:  &#8220;He&#8217;s no dirtier than Clinton.&#8221;  Some recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352550</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352550</guid>
		<description>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#039;s US Attorney&#039;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#039;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#039;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#039;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, conspiracy theories. My statement still stands. Replacing a former administration&#8217;s US Attorney&#8217;s is SOP. Intimidating your own is a Republican tactic: go along or else. They&#8217;ve tried it with scientists, but it&#8217;s difficult to oust public employees without good reason. In other words you can&#8217;t just make it up. That poses a problem for this bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Balter</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/comment-page-1/#comment-352436</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Balter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/a-few-good-scapegoats/#comment-352436</guid>
		<description>Come on, reg, you are asking for facts and Woody doesn&#039;t deal in facts, just theories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, reg, you are asking for facts and Woody doesn&#8217;t deal in facts, just theories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

