C” texas holdem pocket pc telecharger poker gioco a poker play omaha poker slots online…

teens having sex introduction…

Interesting topic… I’m working in this industry myself and I don’t agree about this in 100%, but I added your page to my bookmarks and hope to see more interesting articles in the future…

zrgldzuic ilmoppqye nyxxeqxlxy…

(Now, let’s see how many people on the left, few of whom have a sense of humor, will take this seriously.)

I feel that the overwhelming masses of Cubans have been isolated from information and indoctrinated, which handicaps them. Randy disagreed and tried to convince us that Cubans could access whatever international news that they wanted, although he could only name thirteen.

My own experience with Cubans shows that if one isresourceful, all the world’s information is available – not just Cuban or US

The corollary to that which was argued is that Cubans do have equal access to news and information, which Randy accepted when he wrote: I merely disputed your claim that the average Cuban has been blocked from seeing outside news about the world and thus is less qualified to lead a democratic Cuba.

Uh, huh… Sure Mr. Expert on Latin America. Cuban kids learn all about the good of America and the good of capitalism and free-enterprise. Mr. Expert forgets that Cuba blocks transmissions from the Voice of America and TV and Radio Marti. As for the schools, Rolando Alfonso Borges, head of the Ideological Department of the Cuban Communist Party’s Central Committee said, “The front line of political-ideological work with children is school, and the first soldiers are teachers and other education workers. We have to put our hearts into political-ideological work, and it must be done in a systematic way, where each section of the educational system has specific responsibilities that it must account for and which the party must control.” Then more on the the children: (Cuba) has created a junior version of neighborhood spy networks for children ages 4 to 13. The agency reported in January that the first children’s committee was formed in Cuevitas, near Santiago de Cuba, under the motto: “Vigilance, fundamental duty of the child.”

We could go forever, but my statement was never proved wrong by Randy, and to say that it is wrong is to say that the Cuban people do have equal access to news and information.

You’re pretty sad, Randy. I’m not a liar. Maybe you’re just stupid–besides being a psycho.

In the article JCummings refers to, Alexandre Trudeau reminds us that “never in modern times has a small, peaceful country been more subjected to unfair and malicious treatment by a superpower than Cuba has by the United States.”

Chomsky (among many others) has reviewed in great detail Washington’s relentless 40-year terror campaign against Cuba.

But reading Marc Cooper’s synopsis, we’re (once again) to understand the “failed political project” as basically Castro’s fault, unconnected to the difficulties of trying to modernize while under grave assault.

So the truth is, we really have no way of knowing what might have been (nor what could still occur) under different (that is, relatively normal) conditions.

Chomsky often refers to thought experiments one might engage in. Just imagine if — say in 1970s — the US had changed course and signed a comprehensive peace and economic cooperation treaty with Cuba, nullifying economic sanctions and paving the way for firm Cuban security (as Cuba has no other “natural” enemies) — that is, treating Cuba as it does other nations in the region (whose governments, admittedly, have largely allowed US capital to make use of their resources and populations as it sees fit). What sorts of political and economic developments would have followed?

Prof. Niall Ferguson writes that “the US economy is mind-bogglingly enormous—two and a half times as big as the next largest economy in the world and almost as large as that of the six other members of the Group of Seven combined.” There is actually no form of terrorist attack, not even a dirty nuke set off in a metropolitan area, that could threaten the civic/political structure and larger economy of the U.S. And yet last year the Washington Post reported that, for the first time in history, the Pentagon is studying scenarios for implementing marital law in the case of a second terrorist attack.

Imagine that the sun started rotating around the earth and suddenly the US found itself the (relative) economic/geographical size of Cuba, being economically strangled by a Havana, now with the world’s most powerful military and an economy which is “mind-bogglingly enormous?” Can anyone envision a scenario where the US state would begin dictatorial control of information, movement, communication?

You’re lying again. You cannot show that I wrote “that Cubans have equal access to news and information as people in the U.S.” simply because I never wrote anything of the kind.

You’re a baldfaced, shameless liar. Go read Matthew Chapter 7 before you start accusing others of name calling.

I just made a comment that those with the most information, who happen to live in America rather than Cuba, can make better choices with that additional insight. I didn’t take a position as to what level of participation that they should have.

If you want an object lesson as to why so many of the commenters on this blog think you are intellectually and otherwise dishonest and full of shit, that last comment you made is a fine example.

You are a mendacious liar. I never wrote that they had equal access to news and information as people in the US.

I merely disputed your claim that the average Cuban has been blocked from seeing outside news about the world and thus is less qualified to lead a democratic Cuba. I refuted your comments by citing the active dissident movement within Cuba. I never wrote that they had equal access.

You are a fabricating liar who, when he doesn’t have the facts on his side has to make things up.

What you wrote was your spin on what I said. You lack the intellectual capacity to see the difference between my factually supported argument that Cubans are not completely blocked from news about the outside world as evidenced by the active and vibrant dissident movement there and your fantasy that I am making the case that they have “equal access to news and information as people in the U.S.”

So much for your vaunted (and self-proclaimed) analytical skills. Good luck finding your ass with both hands.

I apologize, by the way, for writing eat shit and die the other day. You may have a number of odious and reprehensible qualities, but I have no evidence that cannibalism is among them.

Warm regards.

In the article JCummings refers to, Alexandre Trudeau reminds us that “never in modern times has a small, peaceful country been more subjected to unfair and malicious treatment by a superpower than Cuba has by the United States.”

Chomsky (among many others) has reviewed in great detail Washington’s relentless 40-year terror campaign against Cuba.

But reading Marc Cooper’s synopsis, we’re (once again) to understand the “failed political project” as basically Castro’s fault, unconnected to the difficulties of trying to modernize while under grave assault.

So the truth is, we really have no way of knowing what might have been (nor what could still occur) under different (that is, relatively normal) conditions.

Chomsky often refers to thought experiments one might engage in. Just imagine if — say in 1970s — the US had changed course and signed a comprehensive peace and economic cooperation treaty with Cuba, nullifying economic sanctions and paving the way for firm Cuban security (as Cuba has no other “natural” enemies) — that is, treating Cuba as it does other nations in the region (whose governments, admittedly, have largely allowed US capital to make use of their resources and populations as it sees fit). What sorts of political and economic developments would have followed?

Prof. Niall Ferguson writes that “the US economy is mind-bogglingly enormous—two and a half times as big as the next largest economy in the world and almost as large as that of the six other members of the Group of Seven combined.” There is actually no form of terrorist attack, not even a dirty nuke set off in a metropolitan area, that could threaten the civic/political structure and larger economy of the U.S. And yet last year the Washington Post reported that, for the first time in history, the Pentagon is studying scenarios for implementing marital law in the case of a second terrorist attack.

Imagine that the sun started rotating around the earth and suddenly the US found itself the (relative) economic/geographical size of Cuba, being economically strangled by a Havana, now with the world’s most powerful military and an economy which is “mind-bogglingly enormous?” Can anyone envision a scenario where the US state would begin dictatorial control of information, movement, communication?