Adios, Herty Lewites
I’m embarrassed to admit that only ten days after the fact do I know learn of the passing of a genuine political hero, the former mayor of Managua and candidate in the upcoming Nicaraguan presidential elections, Herty Lewites.
Indeed, I had been planning to go to Nicaragua this fall to cover his campaign. Unfortunately for all of us, Lewites, 66, died of a heart attack on July 2. I was on vacation at the time and missed what scant coverage there was of his passing.
Lewites was a man who charmed anyone who knew him, yours truly included. And he embodied the very best in the notion of public service, fearlessly confronting corruption even among his supposed allies.
A former Sandinista guerrilla commander, he also served as Minister of Tourism during the period of Sandinista rule. From 2001-2005 he served as the popular mayor of Managua, earning a reputation as a totally honest man, open to dialogue and consensus. Herty led a dissident, democratic current within the Sandinista National Liberation Front, often clashing with party caudillo and former President Daniel Ortega.
Ortega finally expelled Lewites last year, following a well-established pattern of crushing all dissent within the Sandinista Party. Lewites threw his hat in the presidential ring as candidate of the Sandinista Renewal Movement.
His candidacy inspired great hope among the best and the brightest of Nicaraguans. As Ortega, over the last decade, cemented a bizarre alliance with the corrupt right wing forces of former President Arnaldo Aleman, the near totality of Sandinista intellectuals left the party… and most of them became ardent supporters of Lewites.
In his campaign they saw the possibility of a democratic, pluralistic left-of-center movement that could transcend the ossified and demagogic politics of the now-discredited Ortega who is once again running for President. And who now might just win.
Nicaraguan novelist and Ortega’s former Vice-President, Sergio Ramirez, writes this analysis of the challenge his country faces after the death of Lewites.
For American lefties who don’t keep up with the news and who cling to a romantic notion of Ortega, this piece from the lefty Council on Hemispheric Affairs set you you straight. Read it and learn something. Like, the Sandinista Front nowadays is almost indistinguishable from the Mexican PRI. There’s also this background piece, again from Ramirez. Former New York Times correspondent Steve Kinzer also has this reflection on the impact of Lewites’ death.
No one, it seems, gives a hoot about Nicaragua – still one of the poorest spots in the hemisphere. In the 1980’s, the U.S. government spent hundreds of millions of dollars to undermine the Sandinista government. Once it was voted out in 1990, the U.S. never looked back again. As the country succumbed to gross corruption, the U.S. simply averted its gaze.
Ditto, I’m afraid for the American left. When Ortega and the Sandis were in power, they were a cause celebre for U.S. progressives. But over the last 15 years that same left has been as indifferent as the U.S. government itself when it came to the fate of actual Nicaraguans.
Back in 2001, on the eve of 9-11, I wrote this piece on the post-Sandinista debacle, including the descent of the Frente Sandinista into corruption and cronyism. That was five years ago. Since then, I’ve seen virtually nothing about Nicaragua in the American lefty press. As I’ve remarked (endlessly) on this blog, the Age of Bush has given rise to a parochial, myopic U.S. left which spends most of it time twisting its panties over Republicans.
There is a world outside of our own borders. And what happens in it doesn’t always have something to do with George W. Bush.
That world is smaller now because of the death of Lewites.
So long, Herty. Adios, companero.
July 12th, 2006 at 3:41 am
I know nothing about the late Sr. Lewites beyond what you have written here, but may he rest in peace.
But ah, the sandalistas–people who relish their perceived moral superiority to their own country and keep searching for the foreign model that never fails to disappoint.
I remember a lefty–now a Democratic elected official in Calirfornia–who used to prattle about how wonderful Hoxha’s Albania, of all places, was.
The starry-eyed revolutionary intellectuals of the sort who have now deserted the corrupr Sr. Ortega always end up disillusioned (if they are lucky), coopted, or shot by their own movement.
The reasons are many, but I offer three. (1) Socialism does not work. Never has, never will. (2) Politicizing the economy is a recipe for corruption: “absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely”. (3) “The soul of man is evil from his birth.” Human beings suffer from an innate illness that leads them to egotism, violence, and corruption. This will infect every human enterprise. Try to remake society all at once according to some blueprint and you remove whatever checks have evolved, and you give free rein to these tendencies, unchecked by law, tradition, or evolved institutions.
PS. This last tendency is not unique to the left. For every Ortega there is an Abramoff. For every Beria there is a Himmler. Our founders were wise to fear both unfettered autocracy and unfettered democracy.
July 12th, 2006 at 4:11 am
Correction to prior post. The correct quote is
“…the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth.” Genesis 8:21.
The babies are off the hook.
July 12th, 2006 at 10:35 am
Regarding Genesis 8:21 cited above, according to folks who actually believe in this stuff, God said this bit about men’s evil hearts to Noah after he had destroyed by flood every living thing on Earth – save Noah, his family and a bunch of gender-correct pairs of animals that were herded together onto a boat. God did this because he was so disappointed in the fruits of his “intelligent design” to that point that he thought starting over with just Noah and his sons and the boat-load of animals would likely lead to things getting better. Apparently omniscience isn’t everything it’s cracked up to be. (Although after surviving the flood, Noah became the first man to plant a vinyard, make wine and get drunk, so perhaps things at least seemed to get better.)
I don’t believe cliched, misanthropic tripe like “the imagination of man is evil from his youth”, but I do believe the imagination of whoever came up with this fable was quite active and, arguably, inspired. Unfortunately, those like the politically influential Southern Baptist Convention, Assemblies of God and gaggles of demagogic Big Hair Preachers who insist that this story is literally and historically accurate rather than an a literary invention, have imaginations that are obviously severly limited. Even deranged.
Or maybe they’ve just can’t let go of a good hustle.
(I’m not accusing Ugly of anything in this regard, other than cliche-mongering.)
July 12th, 2006 at 10:37 am
On topic, thanks for this post Marc. The loss of Lewites is a tragedy for Nicaragua and, at least, the region.
July 12th, 2006 at 10:55 am
“I’m not accusing Ugly”
Sorry, I meant “Grumpy”…getting my cranks mixed up.
July 12th, 2006 at 2:15 pm
Over at the places I read regularly like NRO, part of the mythology is that only the conservatives had the heart to oppose the dark forces of communism threatening Central America in the 70′s and 80′s. It’s an area I really don’t know much about. But that conservative perspective I describe is one I instinctively don’t trust.
Part of their view is thatr the left and the MSM constantly downplayed the murdereous activities of the Sandinistas (for isntance) while always focusin the “death squads” supported by say reagan.
Is there a moral equivalency in that regard between the Sandinistas and the Nicaraguan right? At all?
July 12th, 2006 at 2:16 pm
Sorry about the typoes.
July 12th, 2006 at 2:36 pm
We sure don’t need people who don’t believe the words of the Bible doing the interpretations and moralizing from it for everyone else. reg, God gave man free will. Man rebelled. In the Garden of Eden I would have followed the rules…you would have been pushing the fruit.
On the subject, too bad that the Democrats undermined Reagan on trying to support the Contras against the Sandinistas. It’s hard enough to fight communists without having the Democrat majority in Congress siding with them, too.
I had never heard of Lewites, but I suspect that his positions would still have been too leftist for progress in that area of our hemisphere.
July 12th, 2006 at 2:39 pm
“In the Garden of Eden I would have followed the rules…you would have been pushing the fruit.”
Go fuck yourself…
July 12th, 2006 at 3:04 pm
reg, was that an insult or an observation?
July 12th, 2006 at 3:08 pm
Mexico has a contested election and we’re talking about Nicauragua! The Left and Right both spend inordinate amounts of attention on pipsqueak Central American countries and ignore Mexico (except for the border), Brazil, Argentina, and Chile (some here from Marc for obvious reasons) Sorry about the loss but can we get serious about Latin America? Big things are happening including moves by Spain and China to supplant the Yanqui Dollar down South. Worth some time don’t you think?
July 12th, 2006 at 5:09 pm
“reg, God gave man free will”
Nature evolved men with free will. It’s an idea they came up with the hard way. It was no gift, but hard work to get from under the thumbs of the powerful since the dawn of time. This is reality not a bedtime story. Unless you have an IQ of 50 that is.
July 12th, 2006 at 5:10 pm
Reg would have been the female in this Garden Party?
July 12th, 2006 at 5:35 pm
“reg, was that an insult or an observation? ”
Probably both, but a regrettable, unnecessary outburst in any event.
July 12th, 2006 at 6:09 pm
reg-
why are you arguing with someone who believes, literally believes, there was a garden of eden? i can tell that you’re smarter than that.
July 12th, 2006 at 6:55 pm
Apparently not…
No excuses.
July 12th, 2006 at 7:03 pm
Let me abandon my own absorbtion in the rancorous and trivial – if only for a minute – and second RLC’s concern. I’d be interested in some good links on what’s happening in Mexico. Marc, you must be following this…aside from your own attempts to untangle the issues, what are you seeing here or abroad that’s useful commentary ?
July 12th, 2006 at 7:31 pm
The Left and Right both spend inordinate amounts of attention on pipsqueak Central American countries and ignore Mexico (except for the border), Brazil, Argentina, and Chile (some here from Marc for obvious reasons)
Richard,
Aside from last month focused on the World Cup, I’ve been concentrating on Latin America for nearly four years. Just click my name.
Marc,
My feeling about the Sandinistas during the 1980′s were really neither pro nor con (although I got furious when I read in the Times about Daniel Ortega visiting the US for a UN conference and spending about a grand on glasses at a Madison Avenue-in-the-60′s-boutique). I just had big issues with the Reagan administration supporting an insurgency in Nicaraugua in violation of our laws.
I also had issues with Reagan’s efforts to hide the truth on the El Mozote Massacre and his comments that EfraÃn Rios Montt had been given a bad rap on human rights.
Reg,
I’ve made a few posts on Mexico recently and another LatAm focused blogger, Boz also has a number of good posts on the subject
July 12th, 2006 at 7:32 pm
Marc, scratching that rash again, writes:
“When Ortega and the Sandis were in power, they were a cause celebre for U.S. progressives. But over the last 15 years that same left has been as indifferent as the U.S. government itself when it came to the fate of actual Nicaraguans. ”
Reagan’s illegal “openly secret” Contra war killed 30,000 Nicaraguans, and was both in conception and execution one of the most egregious abuses of presidential power in American history.
It was also part of a broader militarization of the U.S. and it’s return to reliance on military aggression, turning ethnic and class conflicts in Latin America and Africa into Cold War battlefields.
What an outrage for Marc Cooper to suggest that the left was somehow disingenuous in supporting the Sandinistas against U.S. military aggression. He should get on his knees and kiss the feet of the people who fought that war against U.S. extra-constitutional “covert” terrorism.
Reagan’s contra war was part of the same disastrous hyper-militarized policy that armed and cosseted bin Laden and his ilk in Afghanistan and apologized for Saddam Hussein AFTER he gassed the Kurds. The Sandinistas and their supporters bravely stood against that and, in my book, are heroes for it, even though it turned out that Daniel Ortega was not the second coming of Christ, while Lewites, apparently, was.
The democratic mold set by the Sandinistas, not by U.S. Congress and certainly not by the Reagan administration, remains in place, sharing many of the imperfections of our own republic. But to accuse the left of inappropriately ignoring the problems in Nicaragua today is to shamelessly bend history to suit one’s own highly personal vendetta against professional rivals, apparently.
July 12th, 2006 at 7:35 pm
Good stuff, Randy. Thanks.
July 12th, 2006 at 8:16 pm
Listen, bunkerbuster, you’re way, way out to lunch as usual. And you’re illiterate to boot. Im not defending Reagan nor the contras. And in 1984 I was on the Nicaraguan border with Honduras digging trenches, quite literally, to help the Sandinistas defend against the contras. Somehow I dont remember seeing you there. So dogmatic little homilies from you about opposing the contras are particularly absurd.
What I did say is that since Ortega’s defeat in 1990 the left has abandoned even following events in Nicaragua. Got it? If you think Im wrong then please provide me with 5 links from articles in the lefty press from the last five years providing some analysis of Nicaragua including the political decline and collpase of the FSLN. My view of Nicaragua today is no different than that currently held by former Sandinista leaders Sergio Ramirez, Modesto. Moises Hassan, Giaconda Belli and just about every other former supporter of the FSLN. Jesus, are u ever a thick-headed, dim-witted ideologue.
Thanks for the lecture on Reagan and Central America. I spent ten years in the region reporting on those wars– you think I need you for anything other than to burn up bandwidth??????????????
July 12th, 2006 at 8:25 pm
Marc, don’t dish it out, if you can’t take it. You lecture to the left about what they don’t pay enough attention to, then take offense when someone calls you on it.
“And in 1984 I was on the Nicaraguan border with Honduras digging trenches, quite literally, to help the Sandinistas defend against the contras. Somehow I dont remember seeing you there.”
As it happens, I helped barricade the streets of Nicaragua and got shot at in the process. This is just another example of your presumptive blindness. You didn’t see me there, so you presume I wasn’t there. Beautiful, is this the kind of arrogant BS they pay you for at USC?
July 12th, 2006 at 8:26 pm
Randy… thanks for the post. I was much more partisan than you were in the 1980\\\’s. I spent a lot of time with the Sandinistas and generally supported them, but not uncritically.
I got to know Ortega as well as his wife, Rosario Murillo, and even spent some brief time living with them as I wrote a profile on her. Rosario also became a favorites of the Hollywood Left and I saw her quite a bit when she would come to L.A. Even Ortega himself was feted in Beverly Hills at the home of actors Bob Foxworth and Liz (Bewitched) Montgomery.
In the Summer of 1989 nevertheless I wrote a long piece, lamenting the virtual collapse of the Sandinista project. I was there six months later in 1990 when Ortega was voted out of power. Like many I was shocked, didnt see THAT one quite coming, and I thought (and still think) that Ortega\’s six in the morning concession speech was his finest moment.
I was terribly saddened to learn, as the years progressed, what sort of a transformation the FSLN went thru once out of power. Ortega consolidated his personal hold while other top leaders used their former positions of state power to personally and grotesquely enrich themselves. And then came the scandal provoked by Rosario\\\’s eldest daughter accusing Ortega of incest and rape– charges that have never been tested in court because he gave himself immunity as a congressman.
By the mid to late 90\’s, it is fair to say, the near totality of Nicaragua\\\’s leftist intellectuals deserted the party in disgust. Looks like Bunkerbuster is the Last Man Standing.
As to El Mozote: Im not going to go into some grossly self-serviong mode, but truth is that a partner and I reported that massacre first, a month before it was \”broken\” in the Washington Post.
BTW, in the spring of 1990, shortly after the defeat of the Sandis I was in Guatemala. Using the wiles of a fetching female asst, I rangled an interview with Rios Montt who was then running for Congress. He received me in his home and I can\’t tell you what a weird experience it was. He was sweet and grandfatherly and didnt flinch when I asked him the obvious questions about razing the Mayan countryside. He pretty much admitted it to it all, with the usual rationale that it was a \”war.\” What a creepy experience. I published the interview in the Village Voice. If I can find a digital copy of it I will post it. Â
July 12th, 2006 at 8:29 pm
Bunkerbuster: I can take anything a pissant like you dishes out. But Im not going to waste my time reading your dim-bulb political sermons.I can only assume that if u were shot you took it in the head, which would explain everything.
And, no, you\’ve got it wrong. USC doesnt pay me for this BS, as you put it. I get my funding directly from The Company! It\’s all a big conspiracy you know. And USC is but a minor cog in the Big Machine. Man, are you ever lost.
July 12th, 2006 at 8:43 pm
Whatever, Marc. Just do something about that rash, it’s an ugly one.
July 12th, 2006 at 8:46 pm
That’s cute, Bunkerbuster. But what ur really admitting is that you cant formulate an independent thought on Nicaragua. You can say nothing about the current situation, nor even point to a link. OK.
July 13th, 2006 at 7:33 am
Readers please note that Marc deleted my last two posts. That’s the kind of guy he is.
July 13th, 2006 at 2:44 pm
reg: “I don’t believe cliched, misanthropic tripe like ‘the imagination of man is evil from his youth’”
Tell that to Stanley Milgram
July 13th, 2006 at 3:04 pm
I’ve got to side with Marc here. I read his dispatches from Central America in the READER, WEEKLY, and elsewhere and no one was more pro-Sandinista or anti-Contra than he. And Marc was one of the few who derided the LAT and NYT whitewash of Gary Webb’s charges in the MERCURY-NEWS.
Sorry, probably ruined it for you, Marc.
July 13th, 2006 at 5:34 pm
Marc,
I’d love to read the interview with Rios Montt. What an absolute bastard he was. As you may know he’s now the father-in-law to a US Congressman.
As for El Mozote, what bothered me aside from the massacre itself was what Abe Rosenthal of the Times did to Raymond Bonner. Rosenthal completely drank the Reagan Kool-Aid and I have no reason to believe that when the truth came out he acknowledged his errors.
July 13th, 2006 at 5:53 pm
And BTW Randy, that is when the MSM, never very brave, really caved in and became the lapdogs we know and love. If the NYT wouldn’t back its man in Central America why should anyone risk a great job with fantastic benefits and a generous retirement program to go against the Administration.
July 13th, 2006 at 6:32 pm
Absolutely right, Richard.
July 13th, 2006 at 7:24 pm
The problem with Marc, JLC, isn’t that he took the wrong side in the Cold War. It’s that he uses this blog to make unsubstantiated criticism and lazy, ad hominem attacks on rival lefties. Google his name and you can find that he’s widely discredited for making false allegations against the likes of Hugo Chavez and his supporters. You will also find that, in his attacks on Chomsky and others, he gets pummeled for not providing any evidence for his claims.
This personal vendetta he has against rival lefties is a growing stain on his career. Kinda sad…
July 13th, 2006 at 7:55 pm
You should be as “widely discredited” as I am, pal. This is your last shot at trashing me. Then you go into the dumpster. If you want to argue specific point then go ahead. Want to defame me? That’s OK too, but not on my nickel.
My piece on Hugo Chavez for Truthdig has something like fifty footnotes. I believe you are the one who specializes in arguing without evidence.
Anyway, BB, you no longer amuse me. Argue with facts or adios.
July 13th, 2006 at 11:24 pm
bunkerbuster: “Readers please note that Marc deleted my last two posts. That’s the kind of guy he is.”
These sort of comments about Marc’s “censorship” amuse me on a number of levels. First off, how would you like it if someone barged into your clubhouse while you and your friends were watching Rugrats and started taunting you, “Bunker and Reagan sittin’ in a tree k-i-s-s-i-n-g,” or wrote “Bunker is a big fat cruise missile leftist” on the door of your treehouse with a permanent marker?
This is Marc’s little club. If you think Marc’s Club is for goobers then create your own and maybe the kids will come over to play in your treehouse instead. In fact, if you live in the U.S. you can get both a free blog and, via the public library system, free internet access. All of the tools you need to build your own treehouse are available for free (some, not much, assembly required). Some kids are so spoiled, though, that they think they have the right to pee in the punchbowl at someone else’s party and not get kicked out of the clubhouse.
Secondly, Marc’s has been pretty timid, in my opinion, about rules enforcement and banning people. Does anyone remember how he agonized over whether or not to ban steve the first time? If this was my blog I not only wouldn’t agonize about banning people, I would do it with alacrity. I would ban so fast the data stream of offending posts wouldn’t even have a chance to hit the DNS server before the commenter’s IP address was just a ghost screaming in the machine.
You think you’ve experienced tyranny here on this blog? Pffft! You know that guy, Big Brother, that you’re so concerned about? Well, he’s my little brother– I’ve got him in a headlock and I’m giving him a noogie.
July 14th, 2006 at 5:57 am
Well, Marc says he can take anything I can dish out. Then he goes on to level all manner of insults in my direction. So it’s pure chickenshit for him to delete my subsequent riposte.
If Marc wants to ban ad hominem, let him set the example. If he wants evidence for every argument, he should start by adhering to the rule himself.
Instead, it appears, he wants to be free to slander whoever whenever, then delete the posts of people who respond in kind. That’s pure chickenshit.
And this blog isn’t Marc’s “clubhouse.” It’s our clubhouse: the people who provide the content, including myself. I couldn’t give a fig that the DC Sniper isn’t democratic enough in mentality to understand that.
Lastly, I’m certain Marc would have banned me long ago. In fact, he’s tried. He doesn’t know how!! That’s the real laugher.
July 14th, 2006 at 2:40 pm
“And this blog isn’t Marc’s ‘clubhouse.’ It’s our clubhouse: the people who provide the content, including myself. I couldn’t give a fig that the DC Sniper isn’t democratic enough in mentality to understand that.”
Oh, by Nikki, that’s amusing. I’m actually working for free on a project that utilizes commons-based peer production in its development and am quite excited by these new models of content creation. This blog, however, ain’t that– it is not open source and it is not released under Creative Commons. Even if it was it wouldn’t mean what you think it means.
Although Marc’s content is copyrighted and technically not open source, it is freely available and if you don’t like the way the blog is developing, you can fork the content off into your project (i.e., blog) by commenting on others’ posts there. That’s how it works. What you’re proposing, however, is a bastardization of the concept of collaborative content creation and not democratic in the slightest.
Imagine if the creators of the Flock web browser, which is a fork of the Firefox browser, weren’t merely satisified with releasing their own browser based on Mozilla’s content (in this case, code) but demanded Mozilla use Flock’s code in Firefox. This would be constitute a hijacking of Firefox and would restrict the freedom of Mozilla to release the browser of their choice (i.e., one without any code from Flock in it). If, on the other hand, Mozilla refused to acquiesce to their demands, Flock’s creators would still be perfectly free to release the browser of their choice (i.e., one with Flock’s code in it). Now tell me, who’s being undemocratic in this scenario?
Absolutely nothing is stopping you from publishing your content elsewhere but you are not merely satisified with expressing yourself– you want prevent Marc from exercising the freedom to publish the website of his choice. No, he can only publish the website of your choice. Apparently your mindset isn’t democratic enough to understand how these models of content creation actually work.
July 14th, 2006 at 7:39 pm
Now that I’ve thought about it some more I’ve reevaluated my position. I realize now that Marc’s actually exploiting us. Just look at the long hours steve spent slaving away in Marc’s comment factory just trying to put food on the table for his kids only to be fired by the boss. Marc is taking the surplus value of our posts and getting rich off of it– rich, I tell you! In fact, he’s so exploitative that he actually deletes the products of our labor and bans us from producing more blood money for him. What a bastard! Take heart, though, Fellow Commenters the boss may need us, but we don’t need the boss. Blog commenters of the world unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!
July 14th, 2006 at 8:08 pm
Some Links to Read…
Marc Cooper has a touching remembrance of the late Herty Lewites. Pot/kettle/black. Adam has typically excellent posts on President Uribe’s contempt for the UN Human Rights field office in Colombia and why that is so wrong and why Uribe’s appointment…
July 14th, 2006 at 11:50 pm
Thanks Randy, Thanks Sniper.
As to BunkerBuster: That’s right, pal. My blog is your blog. The only thing missing is a photo of you wearing a gas mask, your fist raised in the air, your other hand holding a placard reading “Whose Blog? Our Blog!”
You’re a crackpot, BB. Email me your address so I can send you a bill for your share in maintaining “our” blog. Whew!
July 16th, 2006 at 3:03 pm
Mr. Cooper:
Perhaps you should shift the central american focus a bit closer to home (both temporally and
spatially). There seems to be quite a bit of evidence mounting that the Mexican presidential election was stolen. See Greg Palast’s interview at Democracy Now.org
July 16th, 2006 at 10:17 pm
I agree that the loss of Lewites hurts the chances of democratizing the FSLN. I must say I don’t think it’s fair to say the entire left has given up on Nicaragua. Of course I’m biased having worked for the Nicaragua Network and Quest for Peace both of whom continue to work insolidarity with Nicaraguans, along with Witness for Peace and various sister city and sister church projects. Still, I agree that it is no longer a trendy issue as it was in the 1980′s, though for people who still care about being informed (NicaNet promtly sent out a news alert on this story), writing letters for action alerts, going on delegations, giving money and doing grassroots level work the opportunities are there and you’ll find some great people who haven’t given up on Nicaragua.
July 16th, 2006 at 10:18 pm
Sorry, messed up URLs.
quest.quixote.org
http://www.witnessforpeace.org
Russ
July 17th, 2006 at 10:14 am
[...] In the comments section of a recent post about Herty Lewites (hat tip to Beautiful Horizons) Marc Cooper responded to a reader (who was being a real jerk, though at times Marc could have been more mature in his responses): What I did say is that since Ortega’s defeat in 1990 the left has abandoned even following events in Nicaragua. Got it? If you think Im wrong then please provide me with 5 links from articles in the lefty press from the last five years providing some analysis of Nicaragua including the political decline and collpase [sic] of the FSLN. [my emphasis] [...]
July 20th, 2006 at 12:25 pm
Kansst du mir ein Speisekarte poker zeigen ?qmm
July 25th, 2006 at 6:09 pm
Ich can mich an dich uberhaupt poker nicht errinern.nwv
January 15th, 2007 at 4:25 pm
Hi! Very nice site! Thanks you very much! xiEXLkZwuGAV
June 3rd, 2007 at 8:15 am
last minute las vegas vacation…
Bargain holidays and cheap last minute holidays to worldwide destinations….
May 10th, 2008 at 5:33 pm
a012a307ddb1…
a012a307ddb10444ccbc…
February 14th, 2010 at 4:23 pm
Happy Valentine’s Day!