Therefore, our advice is for you to buy an up-to-date cable descrambler from your cable TV company….

Let’s not bother to mention the competition our poor have with illegal immigrants for ever scarce health care and state fostered assistance. Yeah, let’s add a few million more, we’ll just keep the pie the same size, and reduce the per capita expenditure.

Public schools are becoming overcrowded with children of illegal immigrants, assuring a reduction in quality of education of the poor as teachers spend more time helping the ESL students catch up to their citizen counterparts.

Want to do something nice for the poor? Write your congressmen and demand that he votes for the House version of the immigration bill. Do something more than give them your pity.

You are a bit inaccurate in your statement concerning unemployment. The following reasons disqualify you from collecting unemployment payments. (Many times workers are allowed to collect when they have been fired or they have quit.) -25 years Human Resources Manager

Quit without good cause
Fired for misconduct
Resigned because of illness (check on disability benefits)
Left to get married
Self-employed
Involved in a labor dispute
Attending School

Next, name a democratic presidential candidate who didn’t, once in office, forget all the election rhetoric about helping the poor and working class people.

Democrats are great for talkin’ the talk but the last one to walk the walk was FDR.

When are all of you Camelot Kennedy liberals gonna stop pondering “what Jack Kemp thinks” etc, wake up, smell the coffee, look yourself in the mirror and vow, I won’t get fooled again!

Voted NO on more funding for forest roads and fish habitat.
The Bryan Amdt (D-NV) offered an amendment to raise funding levels for Forest Service road maintenance and wildlife and fisheries habitat management programs. Senator Craig (R-ID) motioned to table this amendment. [A YES vote is considered pro-business].
Status: Table Motion Agreed to Y)54; N)43; NV)3
Reference: Motion to table Bryan Amdt. #1588; Bill H.R. 2466 ; vote number 1999-272 on Sep 14, 1999

Rated 37% by the LCV, indicating a mixed record on environment.
Edwards scores 37% by the LCV on environmental issues

“When a 13-year-old girl thinks that there’s nothing wrong with having a baby that will drive both her and her child into poverty, we haven’t built the levees high enough. When a 15-year-old boy becomes a father, then walks away, gets shot or goes to jail, we haven’t built the levees high enough. When young people spend more time going to meth labs than chemistry labs, we haven’t built the levees high enough. We know better, but we don’t act because we don’t want to look. If we believe in community, we have to have the courage to do what communities do: together, we have to stand side by side and man the levees – all of us: parents, clergy, teachers, public officials. We need to say some simple truths: it is wrong when boys and young men father children, but don’t care for them. It’s wrong when girls and young women bear children that they aren’t ready to care for. And – and it is wrong when all Americans see this happening and do nothing to stop it because this is all about America’s responsibility, our responsibility, our collective responsibility to create new opportunities for these young people.” —John Edwards, 2006

LCdAC and Michael Balter, it seems that whatever you call me, you’re worse from your side.

From the ultra-liberal commentator Bill Schneider of CNN aired June 17, 2000:

Did (Bush) promise the voters of Texas he would not run for president? The answer is no, he never made that promise. He was asked many, many times in 1988 — 1998 whether he would make that promise. He never did. He said, We’ll have to see what happens, I’m not making any firm commitments, and a lot of people assumed that that meant he was likely to run for president.

Bill Clinton, of course, promised he wouldn’t run before 1992 when he ran for governor of Arkansas, and he did run. It didn’t seem to do him any harm. Hillary Clinton says if she’s elected senator from New York she will not run for president at least during her first six-year term. So we don’t know — I mean, we have to take her at her word.

As you have called me an idiot and a hypocrite on statements which also describe your positions, may I add the word pathetic to further describe you? Facts, logic, and cotradictions never seem to interfere with your irrational points. Give the name calling a rest, jerks.

I take back what I said about Woody being a major intellectual compared to Liberty Dad. They both have their heads up their asses, and they never let facts interfere with their blind ideology.

Not revolutionary, but workable, commonsense approach. I suspect the solution is in exactly those type of incremental initiatives rather than sweeping giveaways or crackdowns…

Is it being considered anywhere?