But limit texas holdem logiciel de poker en ligne jouer au poker comme débutant livre poker online regles poker couleur…

action http://Jedavamp.lc2xnsn.info/sitemap1.html [url=http://Jedavamp.hj3hqe6.info/sitemap1.html ]she[/url]

Why Cant We Be Friends Ringtone Why Cant We Be Friends Ringtone All You Want Ringtone All You Want Ringtone back form mars Ringtone back form mars Ringtone Ass Like That Ringtone Ass Like That Ringtone On The Run Ringtone On The Run Ringtone Put It In …

Congratulations, your last post contains like 90 per cent substantive comment over ad hominem and vituperation. Good work!

Try to remember, “Reg,” the world is not about you, anymore than the world is about your bizarre fixation upon the evil of W, American Republicans, American conservatives and those of us American liberals who have — (temporarily, one hopes,) — abandoned the Democratic Party in despair of the fact that stalwarts of the party such as yourself treat Islamic radicalism (in non-pc terms, “Islamo-facism”) as a problem incidental to the lack of their pleasure at the outcome of US elections.

You might also consider the possibility, “Reg,” that you are not particularly intelligent and mean to the bone. You are this blog’s cheap shot artist par excellance. You spew ad hominem like a geyser. You will either cut it out or you won’t.

Not suprisingly, “Reg,” I don’t agree with you about blogging in Egypt. I remain a free speech absolutist. I say that we should promote and support free speech and democracy, anywhere and everywhere, without reserve or qualification, and then deal with the results. Better to have, for instance, an avowed enemy like Hamas over a crypto-enemy-friend like Fatah.

Adios, Reg. Good luck to you.

My first comment: “Mubarak should be supportive of the liberal elements of civil society, rather than treat everything on the horizon in terms of his personal power.”

I made a plain statement obviously in defense of Alaa’s rights – but in the context of acknowledging a fairly complex political situation in many Middle Eastern countries. If you don’t think the politics and pragmatics of democratizing, say, Pakistan are daunting and defy glib blogosphere one-liners, you’re even dumber than your asinine posts.

The subject of this thread is Alaa Abd El-Fatah. One either supports Mr. Alaa Abd El-Fatah’s right to speech or one does not. One either supports the right to free speech or one does not.

On numerous occasions (deny this charge, and I will quote you chapter and verse) I have endured your personal insults, abjuring reply in kind. Now that I reply in kind, you charge me with spewing more ad hominem than you have, as though — what?– you object to ad hominem as a tactic, a strategy, a practice?

Is there an threshold of ad hominem you consider beyond the pale, or do you reserve to your anonymous self, exclusively, the right to impugn the intelligence, integrity and motivations of interlocutors with whom you happen to disagree?

I await your grand synthesis. Tie all of this up in a bow and explain why you have the right to personally insult people even as Mr. Alaa Abd El-Fatah lacks the right to offer broad, civilized commentary on politics within his own country.

For the fourth time, “Reg,” fell free to make an argument. Feel free to make sense.

You’ve exposed yourself as a disturbed individual.

To summarize, for the third time, you are a coward who employs a psuedonym exactly because your complete stock in trade is ad hominem. You have no discernable principles.

This thread, once again, is about whether Alaa Abd El-Fatah is entitled to enjoy the same rights you demand for yourself. ( the Only difference being, between your two cases, is that you are a rich American coward who hides behind a psuedonym, wheras Alaa Abd El-Fatah is a brave Egyptitian who sits in jail for blogging under his own name.)

You are already on record, within this thread, as saying that you are diffident about free speech rights for Egyptians; you want to know who they are and what side they are on.

Have I missed anything? Feel free to make sense. Feel free to make an argument.

I know it’s bad practice to respond to the feeble-minded and/or deranged in these threads, but I think this guy needs a rest. Maybe now he’ll go take the meds and lie down. I may be a prick, but there is an ounce of mercy in me.

(TM, I am a coward, who hides behind a psuedonym says):

“Ah yes…the fellow who can spot preening, ad hominem, shameful, ideological shitheels shows up with some more wisdom. Could you post a third spot of vomit, Mr Stott. I’m so goddammed narcissistic, I crave the attention from you…and since I’m a shit-heel, I need the opportunity to dip my heel in the shit you spew.”

“Reg,”:

(TM, I am a coward, who spews his invective, ad hominem and non-arguments behind a psuedonym):

Congratulations on not having ADD. You have accurately recorded most though not all of my ad hominem against “Reg.” .

“Reg,”:

Will you now make the argument that you have made an argument?

Anyone who is coming late to this sad brouhaha, please note that the above quote from “Reg” (TM, I am a coward, who depends upon complete anonymity to spew my venomous non-arguments) is “Reg’s” complete and entire answer to my two posts, in which I argue that Alaa Abd El-Fatah is ten million times the man “Reg” is.

Let’s compare and contrast:

Alaa Abd El-Fatah is an Egytiptian who sits in an Egyptian jail for speaking his mind. “Reg” is the psuedonym of an American coward and crazed ideolouge who has posted at least 15 times on this blog and thread, without once expressing solidarity with Alaa Abd El-Fatah.

My name is Samuel Travis Stott. I live at 943 North Ashland Avenue, Chicago, IL. I don’t know what Alaa Abd El-Fatah’s politics is and I don’t care. I unreservedly support the right of any fellow human being to say whatever they will, absent incitement to violence.

“Reg,” you lying coward, you are a disgrace to the human race.

Here’s the original:

http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/story.html?id=7356c7db-2933-46ba-bd82-dd0d9f3ec6de&k=82106