<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gimme Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fleece Blanket</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-635261</link>
		<dc:creator>Fleece Blanket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-635261</guid>
		<description>You can also discover their situation being used to remain warm at:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also discover their situation being used to remain warm at:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashrash</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-616910</link>
		<dc:creator>flashrash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-616910</guid>
		<description>your theme is giving me php errors ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your theme is giving me php errors ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teen incest</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-489198</link>
		<dc:creator>teen incest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-489198</guid>
		<description>Hi. It&#039;s about game.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://fantasy-rape.ca.cx/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; free rape movies &lt;/a&gt; [url=http://fantasy-rape.ca.cx/] free rape movies [/url] [link http://fantasy-rape.ca.cx/] free rape movies [/link]

roleplayingam.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. It&#8217;s about game.<br />
<a href="http://fantasy-rape.ca.cx/" rel="nofollow"> free rape movies </a> [url=http://fantasy-rape.ca.cx/] free rape movies [/url] [link <a href="http://fantasy-rape.ca.cx/" rel="nofollow">http://fantasy-rape.ca.cx/</a> free rape movies [/link]</p>
<p>roleplayingam.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bunkerbuster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-425292</link>
		<dc:creator>bunkerbuster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-425292</guid>
		<description>Maher says some very funny things, but he is clearly an eccentric on geopolitics. He claims to have supported the invasion of Vietnam, because the domino theory was correct, and says the U.S. should simply accept that because the Palestinians have been defeated militarily, they have no claim to a state or national rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maher says some very funny things, but he is clearly an eccentric on geopolitics. He claims to have supported the invasion of Vietnam, because the domino theory was correct, and says the U.S. should simply accept that because the Palestinians have been defeated militarily, they have no claim to a state or national rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Quevedo</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-424128</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Quevedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-424128</guid>
		<description>Bill Maher consorts (I used that word broadly) with the enemy-defending Imus and the US on Tillman:
He has no credibility outside of the &quot;Animal House&quot; toga-geriatrics. He and &quot;precious&quot; Arianna are empty vessels, spent ammo and old news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Maher consorts (I used that word broadly) with the enemy-defending Imus and the US on Tillman:<br />
He has no credibility outside of the &#8220;Animal House&#8221; toga-geriatrics. He and &#8220;precious&#8221; Arianna are empty vessels, spent ammo and old news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-422606</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 22:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-422606</guid>
		<description>I have stopped watching Bill Maher for some time.  He always has this image - reinforced by the mainstream, who love the guy - of being knowledgable and cutting edge.  Actually, I realized when he defended the coverup of the Pat Tillman death some weeks ago (&quot;They wanted him to be seen as a hero, that&#039;s all&quot;) and criticized the Tillman family for calling the Bush Admin. over it.  Maher never once mentioned that evidence exists that Tillman was despised before his death by fellow troops for calling the Iraq mission &quot;a war crime.&quot;

Now, because of the coverup, combined with the lapse of time, any evidence collection of the alleged &quot;friendly fire&quot; is gone.  Witnesses were not interviewed, forensic evidence was not collected and therefore lost....so the Tillman family may have lost, but George W. Bush certainly got something out of it...a propaganda tool who in fact was AGAINST the war and George W. Bush.  But exploiting the dead, who cannot speak up for themselves, has always been a right wing specialty.  Too bad Maher didn&#039;t have the brains to call Bush on this crap on his show a few weeks ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have stopped watching Bill Maher for some time.  He always has this image &#8211; reinforced by the mainstream, who love the guy &#8211; of being knowledgable and cutting edge.  Actually, I realized when he defended the coverup of the Pat Tillman death some weeks ago (&#8220;They wanted him to be seen as a hero, that&#8217;s all&#8221;) and criticized the Tillman family for calling the Bush Admin. over it.  Maher never once mentioned that evidence exists that Tillman was despised before his death by fellow troops for calling the Iraq mission &#8220;a war crime.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now, because of the coverup, combined with the lapse of time, any evidence collection of the alleged &#8220;friendly fire&#8221; is gone.  Witnesses were not interviewed, forensic evidence was not collected and therefore lost&#8230;.so the Tillman family may have lost, but George W. Bush certainly got something out of it&#8230;a propaganda tool who in fact was AGAINST the war and George W. Bush.  But exploiting the dead, who cannot speak up for themselves, has always been a right wing specialty.  Too bad Maher didn&#8217;t have the brains to call Bush on this crap on his show a few weeks ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Nardy</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420939</link>
		<dc:creator>K Nardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420939</guid>
		<description>Yes Bob, and Bonnie and Clyde stole  or bought black market military machine guns that allowed them to badly out blast the cops... thought we might move on to 2007. 

     Reg, I think your dismisal of inner city gun restrictions may be too cavilier, or why would N.Y. care about about the lax laws of Virgina? 

     Again, it seems to me the issues involving the extra fire power of these rapid repeating fire arms might be something the press might want to educate the public about; in their quest to let the public make up it&#039;s mind about the price of a highly narrow (or nonsensical) reading of the second amendment.  Otherwise, golly, it might seem like their hand wringing over the Dems might be construte as, well, selective targets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Bob, and Bonnie and Clyde stole  or bought black market military machine guns that allowed them to badly out blast the cops&#8230; thought we might move on to 2007. </p>
<p>     Reg, I think your dismisal of inner city gun restrictions may be too cavilier, or why would N.Y. care about about the lax laws of Virgina? </p>
<p>     Again, it seems to me the issues involving the extra fire power of these rapid repeating fire arms might be something the press might want to educate the public about; in their quest to let the public make up it&#8217;s mind about the price of a highly narrow (or nonsensical) reading of the second amendment.  Otherwise, golly, it might seem like their hand wringing over the Dems might be construte as, well, selective targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420933</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420933</guid>
		<description>Senator Schumer is introducing a bill that would add anyone declared to be a danger to themselves or others, by a legal authority to the list of those not allowed to buy a gun. He says it has wide support from both sides. 

I hope it passes. But I am afraid it is just a feel good effort. More time should be taken to investigate and analyze how the next Mr. Cho would get around any Gun Store restrictions. I hear he bought ammo and clips on ebay for example, and what prevents one from buying from a private party?

Restriction to Schools and University for anyone declared to be danger to themselves should also be added to this bill, at the descretion of the University, eliminating the current  threat of expensive law suits that I am sure acts as a deterent to common sense safety and security decisions of Administrators.

Both sides of the isle must work together to restrict the rights of  certain people to not only own firearms, but restrict their right to remain amoungst vernable children and young adults at educational institutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Schumer is introducing a bill that would add anyone declared to be a danger to themselves or others, by a legal authority to the list of those not allowed to buy a gun. He says it has wide support from both sides. </p>
<p>I hope it passes. But I am afraid it is just a feel good effort. More time should be taken to investigate and analyze how the next Mr. Cho would get around any Gun Store restrictions. I hear he bought ammo and clips on ebay for example, and what prevents one from buying from a private party?</p>
<p>Restriction to Schools and University for anyone declared to be danger to themselves should also be added to this bill, at the descretion of the University, eliminating the current  threat of expensive law suits that I am sure acts as a deterent to common sense safety and security decisions of Administrators.</p>
<p>Both sides of the isle must work together to restrict the rights of  certain people to not only own firearms, but restrict their right to remain amoungst vernable children and young adults at educational institutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420858</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 01:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420858</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t let me interrupt.  I&#039;m just testing something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t let me interrupt.  I&#8217;m just testing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420759</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420759</guid>
		<description>Nardy - I&#039;m not against gun control.  And I thought I said I was for eliminating the background check exemption for gun shows. But part of the &quot;regional&quot; deal is that some regions can put stronger gun laws in place if they choose.  I&#039;m not at all sure that I&#039;m for putting laws in place that disarm the citizens of high crime areas - not that they need assault rifles.  And while gun laws may be marginally effective, it&#039;s pretty obvious that they don&#039;t go much to halt access to guns in places like L.A., Chicago, DC, etc.  As for the fact that a cow in Montana or Wyoming has more representation in the Beltway than a human in a high-density city, it pisses me off but it also doesn&#039;t look like there&#039;s anything we can do about it. Ceding those seats to the GOP over trying to impose stricter gun control in Boseman strikes me as shortsighted and counterproductive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nardy &#8211; I&#8217;m not against gun control.  And I thought I said I was for eliminating the background check exemption for gun shows. But part of the &#8220;regional&#8221; deal is that some regions can put stronger gun laws in place if they choose.  I&#8217;m not at all sure that I&#8217;m for putting laws in place that disarm the citizens of high crime areas &#8211; not that they need assault rifles.  And while gun laws may be marginally effective, it&#8217;s pretty obvious that they don&#8217;t go much to halt access to guns in places like L.A., Chicago, DC, etc.  As for the fact that a cow in Montana or Wyoming has more representation in the Beltway than a human in a high-density city, it pisses me off but it also doesn&#8217;t look like there&#8217;s anything we can do about it. Ceding those seats to the GOP over trying to impose stricter gun control in Boseman strikes me as shortsighted and counterproductive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob williams</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420634</link>
		<dc:creator>bob williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420634</guid>
		<description>When police arrived on the scen of the University of Texas during the 1965 incident, they had no way of shooting back.  They had only sidearms and shotguns, which had no where near the needed range.
    So they borrowed the rifles of students living in nearby dorms and apartments.  The sniper could no longer take lesurly aim from the tower parapet.
    UT was not a &quot;gun-free zone&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When police arrived on the scen of the University of Texas during the 1965 incident, they had no way of shooting back.  They had only sidearms and shotguns, which had no where near the needed range.<br />
    So they borrowed the rifles of students living in nearby dorms and apartments.  The sniper could no longer take lesurly aim from the tower parapet.<br />
    UT was not a &#8220;gun-free zone&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420406</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420406</guid>
		<description>I agree with everyone who has argued that the Democrats&#039;  failure to enact stronger anti-gun laws is not because corporations are buying them off.  It is for two closely-related reasons:  (1) a lot of Democrats represent constituents that oppose gun control, as they understand it; and (2) if the leadership did squeeze enough border/western Dems to support stronger gun control, it might be setting the party up to lose one or both houses in 2008 or 2010.

That said, the failure to enact stronger gun control legislation is a failure that has drastic impact on city-dwellers.  We have failed to persuade small town and rural folks that lives and families&#039; futures depend on the elimination of assault weapons and anti-personnel ammunition.   The NRA appears actually to have persuaded hunters and fishermen that semi-automatic weapons and hollow-point bullets,  19 shell magazines and the like are absolutely necessary for sport.

I have to some extent lived with the tension between the two factions all my life.  My father was an urban &quot;street kid.&quot;  My mother was country, and her father and all her family were hunters.  We lived off their kill for substantial parts of the year.  Nevertheless, when my grandfather would roll in with squirrel or rabbit wrapped, always, in bloody newspaper, my Dad would say, &quot;Hey, Mose, did the bunnies put up a good fight this time?  You come out unscathed again?&quot;  And so on.  My father swore he would hunt only when the bunnies could put up a square fight.  In the end, my mother and the rest of us became aggressively pro gun control.  However, I have spent a lot of time with guns, shooting guns, and think we can live with small arms for hunting and I guess personal protection.

It is sad, but affection for guns seems to be one of the primary characteristics of Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everyone who has argued that the Democrats&#8217;  failure to enact stronger anti-gun laws is not because corporations are buying them off.  It is for two closely-related reasons:  (1) a lot of Democrats represent constituents that oppose gun control, as they understand it; and (2) if the leadership did squeeze enough border/western Dems to support stronger gun control, it might be setting the party up to lose one or both houses in 2008 or 2010.</p>
<p>That said, the failure to enact stronger gun control legislation is a failure that has drastic impact on city-dwellers.  We have failed to persuade small town and rural folks that lives and families&#8217; futures depend on the elimination of assault weapons and anti-personnel ammunition.   The NRA appears actually to have persuaded hunters and fishermen that semi-automatic weapons and hollow-point bullets,  19 shell magazines and the like are absolutely necessary for sport.</p>
<p>I have to some extent lived with the tension between the two factions all my life.  My father was an urban &#8220;street kid.&#8221;  My mother was country, and her father and all her family were hunters.  We lived off their kill for substantial parts of the year.  Nevertheless, when my grandfather would roll in with squirrel or rabbit wrapped, always, in bloody newspaper, my Dad would say, &#8220;Hey, Mose, did the bunnies put up a good fight this time?  You come out unscathed again?&#8221;  And so on.  My father swore he would hunt only when the bunnies could put up a square fight.  In the end, my mother and the rest of us became aggressively pro gun control.  However, I have spent a lot of time with guns, shooting guns, and think we can live with small arms for hunting and I guess personal protection.</p>
<p>It is sad, but affection for guns seems to be one of the primary characteristics of Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosedog</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420254</link>
		<dc:creator>rosedog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420254</guid>
		<description>&quot;The real culprit here is the inbreeding that goes on in DC between high powered consultants - with their built-in conflict of interest over comissions for TV Ads - and the Great and the Good in the Punditocracy who know it all. Like MoDo and her fixation with haircuts or David Broder who just knows that Bush will get a bounce!&quot;

You got that, right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The real culprit here is the inbreeding that goes on in DC between high powered consultants &#8211; with their built-in conflict of interest over comissions for TV Ads &#8211; and the Great and the Good in the Punditocracy who know it all. Like MoDo and her fixation with haircuts or David Broder who just knows that Bush will get a bounce!&#8221;</p>
<p>You got that, right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Quevedo</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420245</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Quevedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420245</guid>
		<description>For the money=speech crowd (the prevailing law), why aren&#039;t bank robbers arrested for plagiarising instead of theft? Is a bounced check merely speech for &quot;fuck you&quot;. Then it should be protected...

The fiction tying money to speech is not based upon good jurisprudence, rational thought or sound law. The Supreme Court is in a constant state of panic over this issue because it goes to the very heart of the ruling classes. It&#039;s also why Congress won&#039;t require that national elections take place on Saturdays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the money=speech crowd (the prevailing law), why aren&#8217;t bank robbers arrested for plagiarising instead of theft? Is a bounced check merely speech for &#8220;fuck you&#8221;. Then it should be protected&#8230;</p>
<p>The fiction tying money to speech is not based upon good jurisprudence, rational thought or sound law. The Supreme Court is in a constant state of panic over this issue because it goes to the very heart of the ruling classes. It&#8217;s also why Congress won&#8217;t require that national elections take place on Saturdays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RssrX</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420238</link>
		<dc:creator>RssrX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420238</guid>
		<description>Cho only broke two laws in VA.  Having a gun on campus and killing the students.  I&#039;m doubtful that this will be a watershed moment for gun control.  Last year it was the shootings of the school girls in PA and CO.

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/070422/30guns.htm

VA will never give up their guns.  Let&#039;s not forget that Webb got caught trying to sneak his own handgun into his Congressional office.  They&#039;ll work harder to loosen them.  I think the real fight is with the feds as Reg, outlined above, and Bloomberg&#039;s lawsuit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cho only broke two laws in VA.  Having a gun on campus and killing the students.  I&#8217;m doubtful that this will be a watershed moment for gun control.  Last year it was the shootings of the school girls in PA and CO.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/070422/30guns.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/070422/30guns.htm</a></p>
<p>VA will never give up their guns.  Let&#8217;s not forget that Webb got caught trying to sneak his own handgun into his Congressional office.  They&#8217;ll work harder to loosen them.  I think the real fight is with the feds as Reg, outlined above, and Bloomberg&#8217;s lawsuit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Wise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420234</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420234</guid>
		<description>&gt;criminal elements arenâ€™t deterred by gun laws

While true, this is a much weaker argument than anti-gun-control people seem to think.  The widely-known fact is that most gun deaths are not caused by &quot;criminal elements.&quot;  Most are the result of ordinary people enraged by marital problems, having psychotic episodes, or in periods of suicidal depression.   These things usually pass, and further slowing down access to guns (say, with a ten day national waiting period like the one required to buy a long gun in California) might meaningfully reduce impulsive or psychotic murders and suicides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;criminal elements arenâ€™t deterred by gun laws</p>
<p>While true, this is a much weaker argument than anti-gun-control people seem to think.  The widely-known fact is that most gun deaths are not caused by &#8220;criminal elements.&#8221;  Most are the result of ordinary people enraged by marital problems, having psychotic episodes, or in periods of suicidal depression.   These things usually pass, and further slowing down access to guns (say, with a ten day national waiting period like the one required to buy a long gun in California) might meaningfully reduce impulsive or psychotic murders and suicides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Quevedo</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420228</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Quevedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420228</guid>
		<description>marc- right on the mark with this corrption screed.
Today, we would not qualify for membership of the UN because our politics are objectively and demostrably for sale...we do not make the threshold for membership on the issue of corruption...and we have the nerve to criticize Latin and African Countries!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marc- right on the mark with this corrption screed.<br />
Today, we would not qualify for membership of the UN because our politics are objectively and demostrably for sale&#8230;we do not make the threshold for membership on the issue of corruption&#8230;and we have the nerve to criticize Latin and African Countries!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420071</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420071</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve changed my position on campaign finance reform. As long as BUCKLY v. VALEO is controlling the basic equation is &quot;Money = Speech&quot; and until that is reversed or there is a constitutional amendment - which means messing with the 1st amdt - we&#039;re stuck and get wildly repressive laws like McCain-Feingold that ban &quot;Issue Ads&quot; for a period before an election if thaty ad is sponsored by some group that mentions a candidate. That&#039;s ridiculous and will be thrown out by this court unless they&#039;re dumber than I think they are!

Well maybe they are but Scalia seems to have a soft spot for Speech of a political nature. Maybe he was bitten by Alexander Meikeljohn while at Chicago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve changed my position on campaign finance reform. As long as BUCKLY v. VALEO is controlling the basic equation is &#8220;Money = Speech&#8221; and until that is reversed or there is a constitutional amendment &#8211; which means messing with the 1st amdt &#8211; we&#8217;re stuck and get wildly repressive laws like McCain-Feingold that ban &#8220;Issue Ads&#8221; for a period before an election if thaty ad is sponsored by some group that mentions a candidate. That&#8217;s ridiculous and will be thrown out by this court unless they&#8217;re dumber than I think they are!</p>
<p>Well maybe they are but Scalia seems to have a soft spot for Speech of a political nature. Maybe he was bitten by Alexander Meikeljohn while at Chicago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard locicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420060</link>
		<dc:creator>richard locicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420060</guid>
		<description>Over at AMERICABLOG last week Joe Sudbury - a spokesman for Handgun Control Inc. went into the conventional wisdom that gun control laws were a loser for Al Gore in 2000. Joe worked on that campaign and showed data that the candidate in a bind was George 
Bush who, in 2000, supported both the assualt weapons ban and the Brady Bill - to the chagrin of his base and the NRA. Joe&#039;s data showed that Gore could use the issue as a wedge with thatyear&#039;s favorite target group: &quot;Soccer Moms&quot;. But, and this is SO Surprising, Gore&#039;s high powered DC Advisors (paging mr Schrum, paging mr Penn) told him that he should steer clear of guns since it would hurt his chances going after the hunter vote in Tennessee, Arkansas, and other rural states and Gore listened. Just as he listened to them that he should distance himself from Bill Clinton because of the country&#039;s &quot;Clinton Fatigue&quot; and that the Environment (particularly Global Warming) was a lose.

The real culprit here is the inbreeding that goes on in DC between high powered consultants - with their built-in conflict of interest over comissions for TV Ads - and the Great and the Good in the Punditocracy who know it all. Like MoDo and her fixation with haircuts or David Broder who just knows that Bush will get a bounce!

That&#039;s why those much despised - by many here - &quot;NetRoots&quot; draw so much ire here. They say its bullshit and they&#039;ve been proven right. Like Stu Rothenberg chiding certain bloggers for wanting to &quot;Waste&quot; money by running candidates in every Congressional District or Dean for throwing away bucks with a &quot;50 State Strategy&quot;. Then these bloggers committed the supreme sin of being right in the lasat election and that is what galls.

Isn&#039;t it interesting that the two candidates that have risen in the polls steadily are Bill Richardson and John Edwards - both of who have eschewed this &quot;valuable&quot; advice from the Mavens in Washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at AMERICABLOG last week Joe Sudbury &#8211; a spokesman for Handgun Control Inc. went into the conventional wisdom that gun control laws were a loser for Al Gore in 2000. Joe worked on that campaign and showed data that the candidate in a bind was George<br />
Bush who, in 2000, supported both the assualt weapons ban and the Brady Bill &#8211; to the chagrin of his base and the NRA. Joe&#8217;s data showed that Gore could use the issue as a wedge with thatyear&#8217;s favorite target group: &#8220;Soccer Moms&#8221;. But, and this is SO Surprising, Gore&#8217;s high powered DC Advisors (paging mr Schrum, paging mr Penn) told him that he should steer clear of guns since it would hurt his chances going after the hunter vote in Tennessee, Arkansas, and other rural states and Gore listened. Just as he listened to them that he should distance himself from Bill Clinton because of the country&#8217;s &#8220;Clinton Fatigue&#8221; and that the Environment (particularly Global Warming) was a lose.</p>
<p>The real culprit here is the inbreeding that goes on in DC between high powered consultants &#8211; with their built-in conflict of interest over comissions for TV Ads &#8211; and the Great and the Good in the Punditocracy who know it all. Like MoDo and her fixation with haircuts or David Broder who just knows that Bush will get a bounce!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why those much despised &#8211; by many here &#8211; &#8220;NetRoots&#8221; draw so much ire here. They say its bullshit and they&#8217;ve been proven right. Like Stu Rothenberg chiding certain bloggers for wanting to &#8220;Waste&#8221; money by running candidates in every Congressional District or Dean for throwing away bucks with a &#8220;50 State Strategy&#8221;. Then these bloggers committed the supreme sin of being right in the lasat election and that is what galls.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it interesting that the two candidates that have risen in the polls steadily are Bill Richardson and John Edwards &#8211; both of who have eschewed this &#8220;valuable&#8221; advice from the Mavens in Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Nardy</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/comment-page-1/#comment-420027</link>
		<dc:creator>K Nardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/gimme-money/#comment-420027</guid>
		<description>ment to say &quot;anti-depressants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ment to say &#8220;anti-depressants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

