<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelino</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-639380</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-639380</guid>
		<description>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narrator is very beautiful and informative articles. Would like to thank all the authors I wish you success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toledo for sale by owner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-3/#comment-628960</link>
		<dc:creator>toledo for sale by owner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-628960</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#039;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. 

Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>I just wanted to let you know that I have been reading for a while and I would like to sign up for the feed. I&#8217;ll give it a try but I will need some help. This is a great find and I would hate to lose contact, and maybe never find it again. </p>
<p>Anyway, thanks again and I look forward to reading again in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butalbital</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-605854</link>
		<dc:creator>Butalbital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 07:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-605854</guid>
		<description>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter and Christopher Hitchens are two public school educated characters who rebelled against their class background and were members of Socialist Worker Party (followers of Leon Trotsky) in their youth.<br />
They both became journalists. Peter joined the tabloid press and soon became extremely right wing. For many years he was a supporter of Margaret Thatcher, now he is a neo-fascist, who claims that the Conservative Party is too left-wing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601998</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601998</guid>
		<description>up yours fruitcake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>up yours fruitcake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601567</link>
		<dc:creator>The Death of the Rifleman &#171; The View from the Clocktower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601567</guid>
		<description>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the chamber like a roulette wheel, betting everything on red. After a quick prayer to Lady Luck he fired blindly into the crowd hoping to hit the Rifleman but, instead, the bullet came screaming toward the man [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601454</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601454</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.&lt;/i&gt;

That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</i></p>
<p>That is, in fact, an ad hominem fallacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BP</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601445</link>
		<dc:creator>BP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance - uncharacteristic, to be sure - of Hitchen&#039;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast - and I&#039;m a Democrat, chief.

I think the vapid charge would apply to many - the most important of which would be the media - but it doesn&#039;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#039;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &quot;weird&quot;?

Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &quot;threatening&quot; physically - the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly - as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.

I was in the process of saying &quot;But you do know, that&#039;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&quot; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.

So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this - &quot;looked weird&quot;, or &quot;vaguely threatening arm movements&quot; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.

Let&#039;s hope Mr. O has included actual &quot;competence and leadership&quot; somewhere in the mix - (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) - or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Al.  I love your work.  And the lack of substance &#8211; uncharacteristic, to be sure &#8211; of Hitchen&#8217;s rather juvenile attempt to take down McCain is yet another sign of the hypnosis that Obama has been able to cast &#8211; and I&#8217;m a Democrat, chief.</p>
<p>I think the vapid charge would apply to many &#8211; the most important of which would be the media &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t seem to matter to anyone.   Wouldn&#8217;t Chris Hitchens normally find THAT &#8220;weird&#8221;?</p>
<p>Along the same lines, I listened when a coworker commented about how during one of the town-hall style debates that McCain appeared unintentionally &#8220;threatening&#8221; physically &#8211; the way his movement-impaired arms occasionally would gesture awkardly &#8211; as he made a point to a questioner in the audience.</p>
<p>I was in the process of saying &#8220;But you do know, that&#8217;s because both arms were broken when he went down on a bombing mission and they healed badly during a 5+ year stay in a North Vietnamese prison camp&#8221; but I relented because he had already placed the earplugs in his ears from his Ipod Shuffle and had turned back to his desk.</p>
<p>So it goes; one guy is pilloried because of juvenilia like this &#8211; &#8220;looked weird&#8221;, or &#8220;vaguely threatening arm movements&#8221; while Mr. O coasts on a suspect, yet thoroughly uninspected record, feelgood platitudes, and the ability to whip up a crowd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope Mr. O has included actual &#8220;competence and leadership&#8221; somewhere in the mix &#8211; (the Joe Biden choice does not quell my fears in this regard) &#8211; or my friends,  we will have been charmed right into a worse toilet than one we are already in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Camus</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601406</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Camus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601406</guid>
		<description>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008. 
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&quot;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail....&quot;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic.... Greek columns, anyone?
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic. 
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#039;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitchens tells us that, to his mind, it is morally and intellectually impossible to vote for the Republic ticket in 2008.<br />
Why? According to Hitchens, it’s because “John McCain is a lot older than he was in January. He sounds querulous,” and because “he looks weird.”<br />
But wasn’t John McCain fit for office a year ago? To this, Hitchens responds: “Just about.”<br />
What changed? Well, explains Hitchens, to listen to McCain, “it’s worrying to hear the sort of whistling note in McCain’s voice.” And “If you watch [him] there’s something weird about the way he reacts [in debates]” and “[McCain’s] behavior [in the run-up to the debates] “was weird.”<br />
By contrast with the “weird” McCain, Obama, Hitchens tells us, “is not demagogic.” In other words, Obama has not come to political power “by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people”. Certainly not in Chicago (where, instead, he made artful use of Chicago Machine nepotism and corruption). Obama has not in his speeches deployed hypnotic rhythms (&#8220;We will be strong, we will unite, we will not fail&#8230;.&#8221;) intended to lull the attention of listeners into trancelike suggestibility. Nor has he summoned forth sweeping generalizations and oversimplifications. Moreover, Obama has made scant use of emotionalism and evocative imagery to play on people’s fears and concerns. For example, there was none, or very little, of what George Bernard Shaw referred to as demagogic “melodrama” in Obama’s thirty-minute campaign commercial. LOL!!!! There has been hardly a trace of sanctimonious moralizing (about, say, the injustices of the capitalist system). There has been minimal replacement of concrete details with vague and compelling slogans (like, for instance, “Change We Can Believe In” or “We are the change we’ve been waiting for”). There has been no appeal to entitlement, no tangential casting of Obama has somehow omnipotent, somehow the savior, the Messiah, Obama the Majestic&#8230;. Greek columns, anyone?<br />
Vote for Obama, Hitchens tells us, because McCain looks old and acts weird, and because Obama is not demagogic.<br />
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how one gets to be proclaimed one of the world&#8217;s top intellectuals! LOL!!!! (Hannah Arendt must be rolling in her grave!!!) And he has the temerity to charge Palin with being vapid???? LOL!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601391</link>
		<dc:creator>Jost Kaiser - Politik-Blog - VANITYFAIR.DE&#187; Blogarchiv &#187; Überraschung! &#8220;Neo Cons&#8221; für Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601391</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens &#252;ber McCain [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis D</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601378</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601378</guid>
		<description>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#039;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Galloway said Hitchens was a fraud. I never believed Galloway until now. Borderline senile?  Obama can&#8217;t remember 2 years of weekly hate sermons ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601297</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601297</guid>
		<description>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#039;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#039;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.

I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#039;s feeding again from the left&#039;s dish, but he won&#039;t stay long and he&#039;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday Hitchens was paling around with the neocons today he&#8217;s cozying back up to the left. The only real continuum that I can identify is a contempt for religion and religious people (christian, muslim, jew-what you got?), which is probably why he has jettisoned McCain. A McCain election would raise the religious Palin&#8217;s profile to a point he would consider dangerous.</p>
<p>I like Chris, I have always have whether I agreed with him or not. But I have had the sense for the last year or two, that he is a stray dog. Not really loyal to anyone or any institution. With his endorsement of Obama, he&#8217;s feeding again from the left&#8217;s dish, but he won&#8217;t stay long and he&#8217;ll be back to bite you guys in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601265</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601265</guid>
		<description>I smell a sock puppet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell a sock puppet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EinRand</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601235</link>
		<dc:creator>EinRand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601235</guid>
		<description>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.

Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason... in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If in any argument between people of which you do not know all the facts and you want to have some idea of who might be telling the truth you need only note the group resorting to ad hominem attacks usually has a dearth of evidence with which to make a rational argument.</p>
<p>Woody argues with reason, and the rest of you attack. The irony in your use of products of free markets and free minds (namely the internet, computer, electricity, etc.) to attack the proponents of free markets, capitalism, reason&#8230; in support of a racist demagogic terrorist sypathizing communist that is Obama.  Enjoy your new Thugocracy. Atlas Shruggs and walks away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601228</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601228</guid>
		<description>reg Says: &quot;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&quot;

He&#039;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#039;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &quot;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&quot;

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reg Says: &#8220;damned near everyone who Hitchens has been hanging with for the past seven years regarding Middle East strategy is on McCain’s list of foreign policy advisors&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s admittedly a neo-con, but an apologist for McCain&#8217;s foreign policy advisers? Check out the article he wrote, The Case against Henry Kissinger.  Written as to form the &#8220;basis of a legal prosecution for war crimes&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Kissinger/CaseAgainst1_Hitchens.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601201</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Let Sarah be Sarah&#8221; and let the chips fall where they may! &#171; My agnostic views &#38; images I like</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601201</guid>
		<description>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hitchens on McCain: &#8220;Borderline Senile&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601191</guid>
		<description>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class...Lame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you believe that statement entitles you to a guest speakers spot in a journalism class&#8230;Lame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601188</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601188</guid>
		<description>I believe in a balanced education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a balanced education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601159</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601159</guid>
		<description>&quot;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&quot;

And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Invite me to your class for a day, don’t prep the students for laughter, and I’ll read them the riot act and show them that being a journalist means more than making fun of conservatives and playing up to Democrats–something apparently left out of studies for journalists out there today.&#8221;</p>
<p>And for what reason would Marc invite you to be a guest speaker in his jounalism class. Why woulod kids parents dole out big bucks to hear someone who, for all we know, has no experience, no expertise and littel qualification or backround in journalism. I dont mean to insult you as there would be no reason for me to speak in front of the class either. I thought that you guys believe in merit. Explain your propensity towards pompousness please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601152</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601152</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chickenshit coward&lt;/a&gt; and so are you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, Woody, Sarah Palin is a <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2008_10/015392.php" rel="nofollow">chickenshit coward</a> and so are you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/hitchens-on-mccain-borderline-senile/comment-page-2/#comment-601146</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2117#comment-601146</guid>
		<description>In other words, as usual, you have absolutely nothing to back up your claim. N-O-T-H-I-N-G</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, as usual, you have absolutely nothing to back up your claim. N-O-T-H-I-N-G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

