<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LAPD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/lapd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-439506</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 13:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-439506</guid>
		<description>The movement is not protectionist.  A lot of China bashers came to Seattle...but the point of the movement was not for retreating behind &quot;national sovereignty&quot; but to globalize what Galbraith once called &quot;countervailing forces.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movement is not protectionist.  A lot of China bashers came to Seattle&#8230;but the point of the movement was not for retreating behind &#8220;national sovereignty&#8221; but to globalize what Galbraith once called &#8220;countervailing forces.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-439503</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 13:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-439503</guid>
		<description>Turner:  Your statistical differences are negligable.  Democrats and mainstream liberals started talking about globalization, and are now the stronger, more popular candidates.  Smashing Starbucks windows is not the point and I&#039;m not gonna defend that....but capitalism itself became the issue of the left.  9/11 changed that, of course...but it showed - the brief period of protests against global finance (WTO, IMF, World Bank) how a movement can be built that is a network of networks, and can truly affect globalpublic opinion...the Seattle crowd helped the G77 became a stronger voice within the WTO.  The pont was not to shut down the WTO permamnetly, it was to disrupt the particular meeting of the global bourgeoisie in Seattle.  That is a success that we all should find glorious.

Many responsile thinkers - including hte host of this blog - gave level-headed commenary ,and were supportive of the Seattle process.  I think that irresponsible thinkers played a godo role as well.

No protestors trigger cop rampages any more than crazy wives trigger wife beaters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turner:  Your statistical differences are negligable.  Democrats and mainstream liberals started talking about globalization, and are now the stronger, more popular candidates.  Smashing Starbucks windows is not the point and I&#8217;m not gonna defend that&#8230;.but capitalism itself became the issue of the left.  9/11 changed that, of course&#8230;but it showed &#8211; the brief period of protests against global finance (WTO, IMF, World Bank) how a movement can be built that is a network of networks, and can truly affect globalpublic opinion&#8230;the Seattle crowd helped the G77 became a stronger voice within the WTO.  The pont was not to shut down the WTO permamnetly, it was to disrupt the particular meeting of the global bourgeoisie in Seattle.  That is a success that we all should find glorious.</p>
<p>Many responsile thinkers &#8211; including hte host of this blog &#8211; gave level-headed commenary ,and were supportive of the Seattle process.  I think that irresponsible thinkers played a godo role as well.</p>
<p>No protestors trigger cop rampages any more than crazy wives trigger wife beaters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosedog</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-439404</link>
		<dc:creator>rosedog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 11:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-439404</guid>
		<description>&quot;...petition your legislature to approve Gloria Romeroâ€™s bill that would give the public access to the discipline proceedings against these few rogue cops, who, it turns out, were among the most highly trained in the LAPD....&quot;

Good call.  Gloria&#039;s been on a roll, and that&#039;s an excellent bill that, unfortunately, the union will kill whoever is necessary to make sure it ain&#039;t passed.  (Metaphorically speaking, of course.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;petition your legislature to approve Gloria Romeroâ€™s bill that would give the public access to the discipline proceedings against these few rogue cops, who, it turns out, were among the most highly trained in the LAPD&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good call.  Gloria&#8217;s been on a roll, and that&#8217;s an excellent bill that, unfortunately, the union will kill whoever is necessary to make sure it ain&#8217;t passed.  (Metaphorically speaking, of course.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438879</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 02:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438879</guid>
		<description>&quot;Seattle SHUT DOWN the WTO meeting. Not protested it, SHUT IT DOWN.&quot;

And trashing Starbucks storefronts helped do that in ... what way, exactly?&quot;

The WTO continues to meet, I&#039;ve noticed.  Way to go, guys.

&quot;It put trade back on not just the left but liberal agenda. People talked about capitalism again. Neoliberalism was discredited in the public eye. Clintonism and Rubinomics died.&quot;

Oh yeah?

http://www.pollingreport.com/trade.htm

Q: &quot;Do you see foreign trade more as an opportunity for economic growth through increased U.S. exports or a threat to the economy from foreign imports?&quot;

A: in 1992, 48% said &quot;threat&quot;, in &#039;94, 38%.  In January 2000, just after the Battle in Seattle, 35%.  Yep, that&#039;s some real voter outreach you got there.

According to an NBC/WSJ poll, in Dec 1998, 32% of Americans said foreign trade was good for the U.S. economy; in May 2000, six months after the Battle in Seattle, the figure was 34%.

Wow, what a huge impact you guys had on public opinion!  Too bad it went the opposite direction you were hoping.

As to the other numbers you find there -- Americans by and large go more protectionist when the economy is underperforming.  If Americans are becoming more sensitive to global environmental issues and scrutinizing the behavior of MNCs, attribute it to level-headed commentary from responsible thinkers, not to trashing storefronts and triggering cop rampages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Seattle SHUT DOWN the WTO meeting. Not protested it, SHUT IT DOWN.&#8221;</p>
<p>And trashing Starbucks storefronts helped do that in &#8230; what way, exactly?&#8221;</p>
<p>The WTO continues to meet, I&#8217;ve noticed.  Way to go, guys.</p>
<p>&#8220;It put trade back on not just the left but liberal agenda. People talked about capitalism again. Neoliberalism was discredited in the public eye. Clintonism and Rubinomics died.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh yeah?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pollingreport.com/trade.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.pollingreport.com/trade.htm</a></p>
<p>Q: &#8220;Do you see foreign trade more as an opportunity for economic growth through increased U.S. exports or a threat to the economy from foreign imports?&#8221;</p>
<p>A: in 1992, 48% said &#8220;threat&#8221;, in &#8217;94, 38%.  In January 2000, just after the Battle in Seattle, 35%.  Yep, that&#8217;s some real voter outreach you got there.</p>
<p>According to an NBC/WSJ poll, in Dec 1998, 32% of Americans said foreign trade was good for the U.S. economy; in May 2000, six months after the Battle in Seattle, the figure was 34%.</p>
<p>Wow, what a huge impact you guys had on public opinion!  Too bad it went the opposite direction you were hoping.</p>
<p>As to the other numbers you find there &#8212; Americans by and large go more protectionist when the economy is underperforming.  If Americans are becoming more sensitive to global environmental issues and scrutinizing the behavior of MNCs, attribute it to level-headed commentary from responsible thinkers, not to trashing storefronts and triggering cop rampages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438824</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 01:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438824</guid>
		<description>Only if they have internet in the after-life, assuming this is correct, which it appears to be.  
&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nativeweb.org/pages/legal/carter.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Education of Little Tree and Forrest Carter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if they have internet in the after-life, assuming this is correct, which it appears to be.<br />
<b><a href="http://www.nativeweb.org/pages/legal/carter.html" rel="nofollow">The Education of Little Tree and Forrest Carter</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438584</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 21:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438584</guid>
		<description>&quot;by the way, is Cooper the same guy who writes for that lefty, reactionary Nation magazine?&quot;

Are you the Forest Carter that wrote The Education of Little Tree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;by the way, is Cooper the same guy who writes for that lefty, reactionary Nation magazine?&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you the Forest Carter that wrote The Education of Little Tree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438547</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 21:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438547</guid>
		<description>Anarcahists are harmless dudes but they are infiltrated.

this is true.  Whither the RCP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anarcahists are harmless dudes but they are infiltrated.</p>
<p>this is true.  Whither the RCP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438544</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 21:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438544</guid>
		<description>Marc wrote of VTech, &quot;This sort of barbaric massacre makes me cringe to be a human being.&quot;  I didn&#039;t get that post as &quot;scoffing at a piddly tally&quot; (ref FRJCarter#4).

Totally tangential, but since Carter #4 also noted &quot;Hollywood fantasies&quot; as regards a &quot;new chief with a funny accent&quot; - a reference which in my studied ignorance of LA, I didn&#039;t get  - it got me musing on what should be clear to any sentient human being. That serves well as a description of GWBjr taking the saddle in 2001 and attempting to face down evildoers like the Hollywood guys do it. (&quot;Wanted Dead or Alive&quot;, &quot;Bring It On&quot;, &quot;Mission Accomplished&quot;.)  

And we don&#039;t have to wait for that particular sitcom to surface - the adventures of Little Bush will be premiering in June on Comedy Central.   

(I can&#039;t wait for the GOPers current efforts to invert that script, i.e. the progression from doofus pol to dumb television show, by going all Fred Thompson on us in the next months.  The punditry could dub the Republican 2008 campaign - as a sequel to the roust of 2006 - &quot;Die Harder&quot;.   Thompson is the closest thing to Ronald Reagan they&#039;ve got - i.e. he&#039;s noted for being both lazy and shallow but is quite capable of playing President before a credulous audience.  And unlike Bush, I think his geniality is authentic and not compensation for insecurities or a thin veneer covering a mean spirited little shit. I&#039;m wary of folksy Southern white guys of Thompson&#039;s vintage but his shtick seems about as genuine as it gets. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc wrote of VTech, &#8220;This sort of barbaric massacre makes me cringe to be a human being.&#8221;  I didn&#8217;t get that post as &#8220;scoffing at a piddly tally&#8221; (ref FRJCarter#4).</p>
<p>Totally tangential, but since Carter #4 also noted &#8220;Hollywood fantasies&#8221; as regards a &#8220;new chief with a funny accent&#8221; &#8211; a reference which in my studied ignorance of LA, I didn&#8217;t get  &#8211; it got me musing on what should be clear to any sentient human being. That serves well as a description of GWBjr taking the saddle in 2001 and attempting to face down evildoers like the Hollywood guys do it. (&#8220;Wanted Dead or Alive&#8221;, &#8220;Bring It On&#8221;, &#8220;Mission Accomplished&#8221;.)  </p>
<p>And we don&#8217;t have to wait for that particular sitcom to surface &#8211; the adventures of Little Bush will be premiering in June on Comedy Central.   </p>
<p>(I can&#8217;t wait for the GOPers current efforts to invert that script, i.e. the progression from doofus pol to dumb television show, by going all Fred Thompson on us in the next months.  The punditry could dub the Republican 2008 campaign &#8211; as a sequel to the roust of 2006 &#8211; &#8220;Die Harder&#8221;.   Thompson is the closest thing to Ronald Reagan they&#8217;ve got &#8211; i.e. he&#8217;s noted for being both lazy and shallow but is quite capable of playing President before a credulous audience.  And unlike Bush, I think his geniality is authentic and not compensation for insecurities or a thin veneer covering a mean spirited little shit. I&#8217;m wary of folksy Southern white guys of Thompson&#8217;s vintage but his shtick seems about as genuine as it gets. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Quevedo</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438540</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Quevedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 21:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438540</guid>
		<description>Why is everone doing a Black Bloc dbnate on the anarchists when known agitators of the RCP were photographed doing the actual physical confrontation. This does not justify the cop riot but it clarifies a few of the exacerbators&#039; roles.

Anarcahists are harmless dudes but they are infiltrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is everone doing a Black Bloc dbnate on the anarchists when known agitators of the RCP were photographed doing the actual physical confrontation. This does not justify the cop riot but it clarifies a few of the exacerbators&#8217; roles.</p>
<p>Anarcahists are harmless dudes but they are infiltrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forest R. J. Carter IV-Atlanta</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438505</link>
		<dc:creator>Forest R. J. Carter IV-Atlanta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 20:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438505</guid>
		<description>Mr. or Ms. Rosedog, I voted for Jimmy Carter when he first ran for governor, so, no, logic has never been one of my strong suits. But I&#039;m not suggesting you ignore the problems in your cities out there in LaLa land anymore than I ignore the plight of the oppressed black man here in Atlanta&#039;s ghettos. What I am suggesting is that you all overcome your obsession with making your police department a model of restraint and civility. It&#039;ll never happen. If you want to change the world for the better out there in Schwarzville, move beyond the scrapes and bruises of May 1 and petition your legislature to approve Gloria Romero&#039;s bill that would give the public access to the discipline proceedings against these few rogue cops, who, it turns out, were among the most highly trained in the LAPD. So much for Bratton&#039;s reforms at the police academy. By the way, is Cooper the same guy who writes for that lefty, reactionary Nation magazine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. or Ms. Rosedog, I voted for Jimmy Carter when he first ran for governor, so, no, logic has never been one of my strong suits. But I&#8217;m not suggesting you ignore the problems in your cities out there in LaLa land anymore than I ignore the plight of the oppressed black man here in Atlanta&#8217;s ghettos. What I am suggesting is that you all overcome your obsession with making your police department a model of restraint and civility. It&#8217;ll never happen. If you want to change the world for the better out there in Schwarzville, move beyond the scrapes and bruises of May 1 and petition your legislature to approve Gloria Romero&#8217;s bill that would give the public access to the discipline proceedings against these few rogue cops, who, it turns out, were among the most highly trained in the LAPD. So much for Bratton&#8217;s reforms at the police academy. By the way, is Cooper the same guy who writes for that lefty, reactionary Nation magazine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438465</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 19:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438465</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not defending the Black Bloc types (who have gone through overall phases, and now white).  I&#039;m decrying the notion of even MENTIONING them in an article that is ostensibly a criticism of police brutality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not defending the Black Bloc types (who have gone through overall phases, and now white).  I&#8217;m decrying the notion of even MENTIONING them in an article that is ostensibly a criticism of police brutality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosedog</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438464</link>
		<dc:creator>rosedog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 19:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438464</guid>
		<description>Dear Forest IV,

First of all, much admiration to you for having made it to Baghdad to support your daughter.  Very cool.

But about the rest of your post.  So, because we are heartbroken and enraged at the daily devastation that is Iraq, we should ignore what happens closer to home and make no attempt to fix the problems in our cities?  What kind of whacked logic is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Forest IV,</p>
<p>First of all, much admiration to you for having made it to Baghdad to support your daughter.  Very cool.</p>
<p>But about the rest of your post.  So, because we are heartbroken and enraged at the daily devastation that is Iraq, we should ignore what happens closer to home and make no attempt to fix the problems in our cities?  What kind of whacked logic is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438396</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 18:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438396</guid>
		<description>Michael Turner, that excerpt from zmag was right on.

I was very sad to see a couple of people with bandanas over their faces, bandit-style, on some video captures from the demo.  Their intentions are totally athwart those of most of the other demonstrators, eg the families who were present.  I don&#039;t know many immigrants here who would see it as positive to be masked at a demo.  In many cases it&#039;s masked thugs, mixed with their counterparts in the &quot;police&quot;, who caused them to immigrate in the first place.

JC, by the way, you&#039;re totally out of touch with what most of the immigrants who are demonstrating really want, and what terrible outcomes a large-scale violent confrontation between the LAPD and a group of immigrants would cause in this city.  Do you see any irony in your defense of the &quot;Black Bloc&quot; when, at the original demo, most of the crowd chose to wear white?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Turner, that excerpt from zmag was right on.</p>
<p>I was very sad to see a couple of people with bandanas over their faces, bandit-style, on some video captures from the demo.  Their intentions are totally athwart those of most of the other demonstrators, eg the families who were present.  I don&#8217;t know many immigrants here who would see it as positive to be masked at a demo.  In many cases it&#8217;s masked thugs, mixed with their counterparts in the &#8220;police&#8221;, who caused them to immigrate in the first place.</p>
<p>JC, by the way, you&#8217;re totally out of touch with what most of the immigrants who are demonstrating really want, and what terrible outcomes a large-scale violent confrontation between the LAPD and a group of immigrants would cause in this city.  Do you see any irony in your defense of the &#8220;Black Bloc&#8221; when, at the original demo, most of the crowd chose to wear white?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forest R. J. Carter IV--Atlanta</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438290</link>
		<dc:creator>Forest R. J. Carter IV--Atlanta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 17:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438290</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m from the South and this is my first time reading your progressive blog. What a treat. I love it more than Saturday Night Live reruns. Just got back from a one-week visit with my daughter serving in Iraq. (It&#039;s a long story how I snuck in.) What she sees every day, the carnage and the maiming, makes what went down May 1 in LaLa land seem like a walk in the park. And all of you are whining about a few idiotic cops not living up to the Hollywood fantasies of a celebrity reformist chief with the funny accent?  Can&#039;t wait for the sit-com. Come on, already. 

I didn&#039;t see it myself, but in my Baghdad hotel, my military friends were talking about your commentary on the Virginia Tech massacre.  You were right on then. You scoffed at the piddly tally of 32 dead, compared to the daily devastation we see every day in Iraq. Why are you so moved by mere bruises and broken wrists now? Clearly none of the women, children and journalists battered by the LAPD in Douglas MacArthur Park  will feel any of their injuries in a few months. Their assaults occur every day in Iraq to the gazillionth power. Testimony to their sacrifice are the body bags--not the pointless civil suits that will be filed by greedy, windbag lawyers trying to make a buck off a few rogue cops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m from the South and this is my first time reading your progressive blog. What a treat. I love it more than Saturday Night Live reruns. Just got back from a one-week visit with my daughter serving in Iraq. (It&#8217;s a long story how I snuck in.) What she sees every day, the carnage and the maiming, makes what went down May 1 in LaLa land seem like a walk in the park. And all of you are whining about a few idiotic cops not living up to the Hollywood fantasies of a celebrity reformist chief with the funny accent?  Can&#8217;t wait for the sit-com. Come on, already. </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see it myself, but in my Baghdad hotel, my military friends were talking about your commentary on the Virginia Tech massacre.  You were right on then. You scoffed at the piddly tally of 32 dead, compared to the daily devastation we see every day in Iraq. Why are you so moved by mere bruises and broken wrists now? Clearly none of the women, children and journalists battered by the LAPD in Douglas MacArthur Park  will feel any of their injuries in a few months. Their assaults occur every day in Iraq to the gazillionth power. Testimony to their sacrifice are the body bags&#8211;not the pointless civil suits that will be filed by greedy, windbag lawyers trying to make a buck off a few rogue cops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Quevedo</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438262</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Quevedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 16:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438262</guid>
		<description>I was with the DA&#039;s office when we initiated the Alleged Official Misconduct Division(AOM)of the DA&#039;s Office in 1966 to look into police excesses in 47 Cities of the County (right after the Watts Uprisings). The psycho-social profile of recruits, officers and patrolmen has not changed an iota and the academy training on use of force is still a tongue-in-cheek lecture series. When we went to the academy in 1967 to conduct &quot;extracurricular&quot; training on community relations and use-of-force, we were met with aggressive indifference. It&#039;s as if the leaders would say to the candidates &quot;some little goody two shoes ACLU types&quot; are coming to bleed on you about community crap&quot;. &quot;If you can&#039;t or don&#039;t want to listen, at least don&#039;t shoot them on City property.&quot;
 
This was the clear impression of the reception to modern and enlightened training. Tomes have been written on good police training strategies which are very insightful but useless unless the &quot;culture&quot; changes. As long as police leaders extol the undercurrent of &quot;local forces of occupation,&quot;as long as a militaristic character is promoted and an &quot;us vs. them &quot; mentality is promoted by the leadership, &quot;peace&quot; officers will continue to be at war with the lower economic classes of any urban area...and will continue to be seen as body-guards and protectors of property-over-life. Believe me, the police culture in Los Angeles is convinced that the middle and upper classes knows with certainty who  pays its salaries and benefits. Maybe this will always be so. Fifty years years ago it was as it is today and different media types wrung their hands,too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was with the DA&#8217;s office when we initiated the Alleged Official Misconduct Division(AOM)of the DA&#8217;s Office in 1966 to look into police excesses in 47 Cities of the County (right after the Watts Uprisings). The psycho-social profile of recruits, officers and patrolmen has not changed an iota and the academy training on use of force is still a tongue-in-cheek lecture series. When we went to the academy in 1967 to conduct &#8220;extracurricular&#8221; training on community relations and use-of-force, we were met with aggressive indifference. It&#8217;s as if the leaders would say to the candidates &#8220;some little goody two shoes ACLU types&#8221; are coming to bleed on you about community crap&#8221;. &#8220;If you can&#8217;t or don&#8217;t want to listen, at least don&#8217;t shoot them on City property.&#8221;</p>
<p>This was the clear impression of the reception to modern and enlightened training. Tomes have been written on good police training strategies which are very insightful but useless unless the &#8220;culture&#8221; changes. As long as police leaders extol the undercurrent of &#8220;local forces of occupation,&#8221;as long as a militaristic character is promoted and an &#8220;us vs. them &#8221; mentality is promoted by the leadership, &#8220;peace&#8221; officers will continue to be at war with the lower economic classes of any urban area&#8230;and will continue to be seen as body-guards and protectors of property-over-life. Believe me, the police culture in Los Angeles is convinced that the middle and upper classes knows with certainty who  pays its salaries and benefits. Maybe this will always be so. Fifty years years ago it was as it is today and different media types wrung their hands,too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438242</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 16:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438242</guid>
		<description>Seattle SHUT DOWN the WTO meeting.  Not protested it, SHUT IT DOWN.  It put trade back on not just the left but liberal agenda.  People talked about capitalism again.  Neoliberalism was discredited in the public eye.  Clintonism and Rubinomics died.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seattle SHUT DOWN the WTO meeting.  Not protested it, SHUT IT DOWN.  It put trade back on not just the left but liberal agenda.  People talked about capitalism again.  Neoliberalism was discredited in the public eye.  Clintonism and Rubinomics died.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438206</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 15:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438206</guid>
		<description>The cops over-reacted. So did Woody and JC.

Rumors are a cop was knocked off his motorcycle. This sort of thing does cause most cops to over-react. But then, when have they ever needed a good excuse.

I think what happened is most of the protestors did not understand they were being told to disperse and go home. The cops assumed they all knew they had been told. Things got ugly, as they usually can, especially with cops, when two sides are not communicating.

I think Marc will be paying more taxes next year to pay off another big Court Fine LAPD is going to get for this one. In fact, it seems the minute LAPD gets one fine paid for them, they run out and incur another. The Judge should consider 45 days in the clinker for some of them this time.

Give them the Hilton repeat offender treatment. Not the Hotel kind of course, the Paris kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cops over-reacted. So did Woody and JC.</p>
<p>Rumors are a cop was knocked off his motorcycle. This sort of thing does cause most cops to over-react. But then, when have they ever needed a good excuse.</p>
<p>I think what happened is most of the protestors did not understand they were being told to disperse and go home. The cops assumed they all knew they had been told. Things got ugly, as they usually can, especially with cops, when two sides are not communicating.</p>
<p>I think Marc will be paying more taxes next year to pay off another big Court Fine LAPD is going to get for this one. In fact, it seems the minute LAPD gets one fine paid for them, they run out and incur another. The Judge should consider 45 days in the clinker for some of them this time.</p>
<p>Give them the Hilton repeat offender treatment. Not the Hotel kind of course, the Paris kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob williams</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438162</link>
		<dc:creator>bob williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 14:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438162</guid>
		<description>Seattle was a &quot;success&quot; in what sense, exactly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seattle was a &#8220;success&#8221; in what sense, exactly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438153</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 14:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438153</guid>
		<description>Seattle would not have been a succes without the &quot;violent&quot; anarchists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seattle would not have been a succes without the &#8220;violent&#8221; anarchists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lapd/comment-page-1/#comment-438152</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 14:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/lapd/#comment-438152</guid>
		<description>Michael Turner:  &quot;Here I thought Woody was being stupid, and jcummings comes right along and outdoes him. Some peaceful protesters took foam bullets and baton strikes because of the provocateurs, not just because of provoked cops.&quot;

JC:  Blame the wifebeating on the woman who gave the husband road rage on the way home.  What can a poor boy do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Turner:  &#8220;Here I thought Woody was being stupid, and jcummings comes right along and outdoes him. Some peaceful protesters took foam bullets and baton strikes because of the provocateurs, not just because of provoked cops.&#8221;</p>
<p>JC:  Blame the wifebeating on the woman who gave the husband road rage on the way home.  What can a poor boy do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

