<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawn Chair Militias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: brigite bardotssj</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-70863</link>
		<dc:creator>brigite bardotssj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-70863</guid>
		<description>Eddie800 &lt;a href="http://frogger.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;poker&lt;/a&gt;ssj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eddie800 <a href="http://frogger.com/" rel="nofollow">poker</a>ssj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: green dem</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11947</link>
		<dc:creator>green dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11947</guid>
		<description>I have nothing in particular to say about the minutemen, except that I'm glad to hear that they managed not to blow a few of each other away by mistake.



About the bigger question - illegal immigration - the only people it seems to me that are wholly consistent on this issue are libertarians and pure populists.



If conservatives are so concerned about the plight of the white working class, and the alleged effect of illegal immigration on the working class, then why do they support economic policies that have over the past few decades done more than a little damage to the economic security of working people? Its rather difficult not to conclude that for conservatives this whole issue comes down to race, and racial purity, more than anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nothing in particular to say about the minutemen, except that I&#8217;m glad to hear that they managed not to blow a few of each other away by mistake.</p>
<p>About the bigger question - illegal immigration - the only people it seems to me that are wholly consistent on this issue are libertarians and pure populists.</p>
<p>If conservatives are so concerned about the plight of the white working class, and the alleged effect of illegal immigration on the working class, then why do they support economic policies that have over the past few decades done more than a little damage to the economic security of working people? Its rather difficult not to conclude that for conservatives this whole issue comes down to race, and racial purity, more than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. York</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11948</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11948</guid>
		<description>Certainly. Good post. This sort of thing is an embarassment but a free society has to allow it. The merit however doe not get carte blanche. This is a nativist ruse. The solutions live at a much deeper level than political theatre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly. Good post. This sort of thing is an embarassment but a free society has to allow it. The merit however doe not get carte blanche. This is a nativist ruse. The solutions live at a much deeper level than political theatre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Moore (Useful Fools)</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11949</link>
		<dc:creator>John Moore (Useful Fools)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11949</guid>
		<description>"Indeed, those drawn to this event  (apart from being about 99.9% white) are disproportionaly aged and retired and are no more fit to conduct â€œcivilian patrolsâ€ than they are set to run a marathon."



Well, what do you expect. People with jobs  don't have the time to go to out-of-the-way Tombstone, AZ.



However, they are probably mostly fit enough to do the patrols, which consist of setting up radio-connected OP's and sitting there waiting for folks to go by. If you don't think so, check out Sheriff Joe's Sun City posse sometime, where you have lots of senior and very senior citizens, firearms trained by the sheriff and well armed, who keep the peace and have never had a negative incident. Getting old does not equate with getting stupid, and ridiculing this group for that component is cheap.



That this is a media event is obvious, and so stated by the organizers. That some local clowns are attached is also to be predicted, and says nothing about the validity or lack thereof of this event.



As to Green's comments about working class jobs or some such nonsense, many are concerned far more about the rampant illegality of the immigration and the implications that has for our society of laws, and for our national security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Indeed, those drawn to this event  (apart from being about 99.9% white) are disproportionaly aged and retired and are no more fit to conduct â€œcivilian patrolsâ€ than they are set to run a marathon.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, what do you expect. People with jobs  don&#8217;t have the time to go to out-of-the-way Tombstone, AZ.</p>
<p>However, they are probably mostly fit enough to do the patrols, which consist of setting up radio-connected OP&#8217;s and sitting there waiting for folks to go by. If you don&#8217;t think so, check out Sheriff Joe&#8217;s Sun City posse sometime, where you have lots of senior and very senior citizens, firearms trained by the sheriff and well armed, who keep the peace and have never had a negative incident. Getting old does not equate with getting stupid, and ridiculing this group for that component is cheap.</p>
<p>That this is a media event is obvious, and so stated by the organizers. That some local clowns are attached is also to be predicted, and says nothing about the validity or lack thereof of this event.</p>
<p>As to Green&#8217;s comments about working class jobs or some such nonsense, many are concerned far more about the rampant illegality of the immigration and the implications that has for our society of laws, and for our national security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virgil Johnson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11950</link>
		<dc:creator>Virgil Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11950</guid>
		<description>The photo's are getting more interesting...hehehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The photo&#8217;s are getting more interesting&#8230;hehehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: too many steves</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11951</link>
		<dc:creator>too many steves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11951</guid>
		<description>Just one more excellent example of the superficial nature of grassroots rallies and protests.  As if this farce will have any demonstrable impact on the issue of illegal immigration - bah!  I'm sure they all had a lovely time in the sunshine with their buddies.  I especially like the photos showing them striking the super-serious pose - noses scrunched up and brows furrowed in hyper-earnest congfigurations.



What a collosal waste of energy.  Marc, you should have gone surf fishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one more excellent example of the superficial nature of grassroots rallies and protests.  As if this farce will have any demonstrable impact on the issue of illegal immigration - bah!  I&#8217;m sure they all had a lovely time in the sunshine with their buddies.  I especially like the photos showing them striking the super-serious pose - noses scrunched up and brows furrowed in hyper-earnest congfigurations.</p>
<p>What a collosal waste of energy.  Marc, you should have gone surf fishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard lo cicero</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11952</link>
		<dc:creator>richard lo cicero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11952</guid>
		<description>Ignore the underlying issues raised and don't be suprised that very draconian anti-immigrant measures become very popular.  Tom Tancredo is just waiting with harsh measures in his bills to pass Congress. Interesting article in the nation on how Gun laws have driven many westerners, who otherwise agree with dems, to the GOP. The same could happen with immigration. Incidently, I'm not arguing with your figures since you were there but don't authorities almost always low ball the figures of attendees at these shindigs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignore the underlying issues raised and don&#8217;t be suprised that very draconian anti-immigrant measures become very popular.  Tom Tancredo is just waiting with harsh measures in his bills to pass Congress. Interesting article in the nation on how Gun laws have driven many westerners, who otherwise agree with dems, to the GOP. The same could happen with immigration. Incidently, I&#8217;m not arguing with your figures since you were there but don&#8217;t authorities almost always low ball the figures of attendees at these shindigs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jusfishn</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11953</link>
		<dc:creator>jusfishn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11953</guid>
		<description>Good post Marc.

Looks like you witnessed a good old fashoned Cluster F--K.

Lawn chairs??? Patrol???

Lawn chairs implies sitting. Patrol implies traveling (like a posted stretch of road).

Theres a mismatch here somewhere. None of your pictures show any type of equipment needed for a venture like this. 

CNN must have been hardup for a story when they covered this event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Marc.</p>
<p>Looks like you witnessed a good old fashoned Cluster F&#8211;K.</p>
<p>Lawn chairs??? Patrol???</p>
<p>Lawn chairs implies sitting. Patrol implies traveling (like a posted stretch of road).</p>
<p>Theres a mismatch here somewhere. None of your pictures show any type of equipment needed for a venture like this. </p>
<p>CNN must have been hardup for a story when they covered this event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virgil Johnson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11954</link>
		<dc:creator>Virgil Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11954</guid>
		<description>This just gave me a great new marketing idea! Motorized lawn chairs...hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just gave me a great new marketing idea! Motorized lawn chairs&#8230;hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosedog</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11955</link>
		<dc:creator>rosedog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11955</guid>
		<description>Good post, Marc.  Looking forward to your article.  Susan's piece is very good too.  (Terrific woman who's smart, skilled, AND very pretty.)



The following 'graphs are, of course, also representative of what has occurred on California's AM radio airwaves:



"Steve Rendall, a senior analyst with the Washington, D.C.-based Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, said radio talk shows have devoted a substantial amount of airtime to anti-illegal immigration advocates for more than a decade, but the movement is now making it into more mainstream media, driven by conservative cable shows. He said the hosts asked "softball questions" and basically had the project's spokesmen on unopposed. 



"'It was basically a frictionless public-relations outing for the Minuteman Project,' he said."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Marc.  Looking forward to your article.  Susan&#8217;s piece is very good too.  (Terrific woman who&#8217;s smart, skilled, AND very pretty.)</p>
<p>The following &#8216;graphs are, of course, also representative of what has occurred on California&#8217;s AM radio airwaves:</p>
<p>&#8220;Steve Rendall, a senior analyst with the Washington, D.C.-based Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, said radio talk shows have devoted a substantial amount of airtime to anti-illegal immigration advocates for more than a decade, but the movement is now making it into more mainstream media, driven by conservative cable shows. He said the hosts asked &#8220;softball questions&#8221; and basically had the project&#8217;s spokesmen on unopposed. </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;It was basically a frictionless public-relations outing for the Minuteman Project,&#8217; he said.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Moore (Useful Fools)</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11956</link>
		<dc:creator>John Moore (Useful Fools)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11956</guid>
		<description>richard lo cicero



Right on all counts. The so-called "assault weapons ban" and other foolish gun control nonsense drove lots of folks into the Republican fold, and was considered responsible for the loss of a number of Democratic seats in 1994. That's why you will not see many Democrats pushing gun laws any more, except from safe districts.



The "assault weapons" ban could have been a gift to those of us who support our 2nd amendment rights. What was banned was merely the superficial characteristics of the weapons, not the weapons themselves. Furthermore, the ban was sold to the public as prohibiting submachine guns (some of which are true assault weapons) but in fact it did not, as submachine guns were already tightly controlled and perfectly legal for citizen ownership (still true). 



Ironically, it also banned large magazines for pistols. The result was the development of a number of small but deadly 10 round weapons (.40 cal Glock, for example). These turned out to be very popular among women, since they fit nicely into a purse. The ban actually created a market and its solution, reducing rapes (and the population of rapists).



The ban achieved none of its advertised goals, but rather resulted in political points against the anti-gunners. I chortled all the way to the ballot box.



Immigration, IMHO, is a more complex issue. But the fact that laws are not being enforced is beyond dispute, and that they should be enforced is a valid political argument - and the core of the Minuteman demonstration.



BTW... Marc, at one point you said this was nothing more than a media event. Now you criticize the members for not being ready for all out war, or whatever. Which is it - a media event, which does not require a bunch of SEALS, or a para-military operation, which *might* require more fit individuals?



Have you read the event media and participant material? One couldn't tell from the reporting (and you are better than what I see on TV, btw)... Check out &lt;a href="http://www.minutemanproject.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.minutemanproject.com/&lt;/a&gt; for what the organizers are telling prospective members. It cuts through a bunch of bull and stereotyping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richard lo cicero</p>
<p>Right on all counts. The so-called &#8220;assault weapons ban&#8221; and other foolish gun control nonsense drove lots of folks into the Republican fold, and was considered responsible for the loss of a number of Democratic seats in 1994. That&#8217;s why you will not see many Democrats pushing gun laws any more, except from safe districts.</p>
<p>The &#8220;assault weapons&#8221; ban could have been a gift to those of us who support our 2nd amendment rights. What was banned was merely the superficial characteristics of the weapons, not the weapons themselves. Furthermore, the ban was sold to the public as prohibiting submachine guns (some of which are true assault weapons) but in fact it did not, as submachine guns were already tightly controlled and perfectly legal for citizen ownership (still true). </p>
<p>Ironically, it also banned large magazines for pistols. The result was the development of a number of small but deadly 10 round weapons (.40 cal Glock, for example). These turned out to be very popular among women, since they fit nicely into a purse. The ban actually created a market and its solution, reducing rapes (and the population of rapists).</p>
<p>The ban achieved none of its advertised goals, but rather resulted in political points against the anti-gunners. I chortled all the way to the ballot box.</p>
<p>Immigration, IMHO, is a more complex issue. But the fact that laws are not being enforced is beyond dispute, and that they should be enforced is a valid political argument - and the core of the Minuteman demonstration.</p>
<p>BTW&#8230; Marc, at one point you said this was nothing more than a media event. Now you criticize the members for not being ready for all out war, or whatever. Which is it - a media event, which does not require a bunch of SEALS, or a para-military operation, which *might* require more fit individuals?</p>
<p>Have you read the event media and participant material? One couldn&#8217;t tell from the reporting (and you are better than what I see on TV, btw)&#8230; Check out <a href="http://www.minutemanproject.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.minutemanproject.com/</a> for what the organizers are telling prospective members. It cuts through a bunch of bull and stereotyping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. York</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11957</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11957</guid>
		<description>I think the seals would be beached in that dried up country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the seals would be beached in that dried up country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. York</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11958</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11958</guid>
		<description>Yet the Border Patrol doesn't want or need them. certainly a stubborn fact for the so-called helpers to digest I would think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet the Border Patrol doesn&#8217;t want or need them. certainly a stubborn fact for the so-called helpers to digest I would think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rockford</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11959</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rockford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11959</guid>
		<description>By all accounts, the Minutemen circus was a success. It got Media attention, where before there was none. The assignment of 500 border patrol agents to Arizona was a direct result of the Media attention.



Yes there are kooks and weirdos in this event, but the bottom line is that the border is not enforced, people of all political persuasions are sick and tired of it; and much like Prop 13, it waits in the wings to remake the political landscape.



This is what happens when both parties duck the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By all accounts, the Minutemen circus was a success. It got Media attention, where before there was none. The assignment of 500 border patrol agents to Arizona was a direct result of the Media attention.</p>
<p>Yes there are kooks and weirdos in this event, but the bottom line is that the border is not enforced, people of all political persuasions are sick and tired of it; and much like Prop 13, it waits in the wings to remake the political landscape.</p>
<p>This is what happens when both parties duck the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. York</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11960</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11960</guid>
		<description>"The assignment of 500 border patrol agents to Arizona was a direct result of the Media attention."



What's the source of this claim? Are you suggesting before this the Border Patrol wasn't aware of the border in Arizona? Or is it because of the need to cover the kooks on this side temporarily? I don't know, the more I read of those differing opinions the more I think of Strother Martin in Butch and Sundance. "Morons. I've got morons on my team."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The assignment of 500 border patrol agents to Arizona was a direct result of the Media attention.&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the source of this claim? Are you suggesting before this the Border Patrol wasn&#8217;t aware of the border in Arizona? Or is it because of the need to cover the kooks on this side temporarily? I don&#8217;t know, the more I read of those differing opinions the more I think of Strother Martin in Butch and Sundance. &#8220;Morons. I&#8217;ve got morons on my team.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Moore (Useful Fools)</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11961</link>
		<dc:creator>John Moore (Useful Fools)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11961</guid>
		<description>Only an idiot would fail to understand that the border patrol in AZ is being boosted due to this event.



Media Attention has been been badly attenuated (for MAY, that means reduced) by the end-to-end Schiavo and Pope deaths.



Personally, like many in the group, I favor legal immigration and welcome Mexican workers among others. But I wish Mexico would get its own economic act together and stop using us as a safety valve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only an idiot would fail to understand that the border patrol in AZ is being boosted due to this event.</p>
<p>Media Attention has been been badly attenuated (for MAY, that means reduced) by the end-to-end Schiavo and Pope deaths.</p>
<p>Personally, like many in the group, I favor legal immigration and welcome Mexican workers among others. But I wish Mexico would get its own economic act together and stop using us as a safety valve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim R</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11962</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11962</guid>
		<description>Common sense is rarely written Mark. What are your solutions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Common sense is rarely written Mark. What are your solutions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. York</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11963</guid>
		<description>I didn't detect an answer to my question. 500 permanant staff have been assigned in that stretch of border? I'll await a factual answer. I realize that will be tough in the innuendo-land of poz but provide a link to the source from a government agency. Since I work for the feds I'll recognize it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t detect an answer to my question. 500 permanant staff have been assigned in that stretch of border? I&#8217;ll await a factual answer. I realize that will be tough in the innuendo-land of poz but provide a link to the source from a government agency. Since I work for the feds I&#8217;ll recognize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Moore (Useful Fools)</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11964</link>
		<dc:creator>John Moore (Useful Fools)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11964</guid>
		<description>Mark, since you're a budding journalist (or so you told us on PressThink if I remember correctly), why don't you go dig out the information. After all, you work for the feds, so you'll know a genuine source before any of the rest of us mere peasants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, since you&#8217;re a budding journalist (or so you told us on PressThink if I remember correctly), why don&#8217;t you go dig out the information. After all, you work for the feds, so you&#8217;ll know a genuine source before any of the rest of us mere peasants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rockford</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/lawn-chair-militias/#comment-11965</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rockford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.laweekly.com/marccooper/?p=348#comment-11965</guid>
		<description>Mark --



&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/29/border.patrol.ap/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/29/border.patrol.ap/&lt;/a&gt;



"The border buildup was to be announced Wednesday -- two days before civilian volunteers with the so-called Minuteman Project begin a monthlong Arizona patrol against immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico line.



About 155 agents will be immediately sent to Arizona, according to department officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the buildup was not yet announced. More than 370 additional agents -- all new trainees -- will be permanently assigned to the Arizona border throughout the year.



Until they are in place, another 200 agents will be temporarily stationed in Arizona during the high immigration season this spring and summer, officials said."



Read the whole story. The thing speaks for itself. Note that people in the border area have been complaining for YEARS about this, I recall LAT coverage of this going back to at least 2003 and perhaps longer. Ever since increased pressure along the California border, the Coyotes and Illegal immigrants shifted to the Arizona desert.



The current (and previous Administrations going back to Nixon, btw) Administration does not intend to enforce the laws of the land. Illegal aliens make excellent low cost labor and help big business. It also allows this Administration to court Latino voters, GWB has said he wants increased immigration from Mexico (legal) and has floated various pandering trial balloons on amnesty issues. If the Administration were REALLY interested in a secure border that vastly reduced the amount of illegal immigration by orders of magnitude, they would spend the money for walls, sensors, and agents along the border. Their budget reveals that they have ZERO intention of having a secure border:



&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/02/09/MNGOKB837T1.DTL" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/02/09/MNGOKB837T1.DTL&lt;/a&gt;



Only 210 new border agents? That is truly pathetic, and THAT is what people in the Minutemen and folks who dreamed up this media stunt are ticked off about.



The LAT had essentially the same coverage as what Marc has posted, what's revealing is the anger towards GWB that the overwhelmingly Republican crowd displayed. A savvy Democrat who picked up on this issue and got right with National Security could clean the Republican's clock; potentially drawing away a TON of voters in a "realignment" election. Unfortunately the adherence to Politically Correct orthodoxy makes this about as likely as my winning the lottery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/29/border.patrol.ap/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/03/29/border.patrol.ap/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The border buildup was to be announced Wednesday &#8212; two days before civilian volunteers with the so-called Minuteman Project begin a monthlong Arizona patrol against immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico line.</p>
<p>About 155 agents will be immediately sent to Arizona, according to department officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because the buildup was not yet announced. More than 370 additional agents &#8212; all new trainees &#8212; will be permanently assigned to the Arizona border throughout the year.</p>
<p>Until they are in place, another 200 agents will be temporarily stationed in Arizona during the high immigration season this spring and summer, officials said.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read the whole story. The thing speaks for itself. Note that people in the border area have been complaining for YEARS about this, I recall LAT coverage of this going back to at least 2003 and perhaps longer. Ever since increased pressure along the California border, the Coyotes and Illegal immigrants shifted to the Arizona desert.</p>
<p>The current (and previous Administrations going back to Nixon, btw) Administration does not intend to enforce the laws of the land. Illegal aliens make excellent low cost labor and help big business. It also allows this Administration to court Latino voters, GWB has said he wants increased immigration from Mexico (legal) and has floated various pandering trial balloons on amnesty issues. If the Administration were REALLY interested in a secure border that vastly reduced the amount of illegal immigration by orders of magnitude, they would spend the money for walls, sensors, and agents along the border. Their budget reveals that they have ZERO intention of having a secure border:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/02/09/MNGOKB837T1.DTL" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/02/09/MNGOKB837T1.DTL</a></p>
<p>Only 210 new border agents? That is truly pathetic, and THAT is what people in the Minutemen and folks who dreamed up this media stunt are ticked off about.</p>
<p>The LAT had essentially the same coverage as what Marc has posted, what&#8217;s revealing is the anger towards GWB that the overwhelmingly Republican crowd displayed. A savvy Democrat who picked up on this issue and got right with National Security could clean the Republican&#8217;s clock; potentially drawing away a TON of voters in a &#8220;realignment&#8221; election. Unfortunately the adherence to Politically Correct orthodoxy makes this about as likely as my winning the lottery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
