Of This and That. Hope, Freedom and Fear
Taipei, Taiwan
Monday Night
This is the first real break in time I’ve gotten since arriving here last week. Our gracious hosts from National Taiwan University have run us ragged 15 hours a day with visits, trips, conferences and rather wonderful meals. The highlight was a dinner last night with an aboriginal Puyum tribe leader about 75 miles south of ere. After a sumptuous meal, in full native costume, he sang us traditional folk songs in his native dialect and then finished off the set with a roaring rendition of “My Way” in English! Unreal. And Simply fabulous.
Now, on to some random thoughts that have been percolating in my head:
Barack
Barack Obama is all over the covers of the dozens of Asian magazines I just saw in a local book shop. My Taiwanese hosts are as excited about him as are my European and American press colleagues who are along with me on this trip. Everyone agrees that his election radically redraws the international image of the United States. And hope investedin him still burns brightly. As you know, two weeks ago I got bored with the whiny debate over his cabinet appointments. I am much more excited about the ambitious public investment and jobs program he announced this weekend. Sounds great to me. Let’s hope it happens. Meanwhile, here’s a reasonable piece on the whole kerfuffle from my pal David Corn. I’m pretty much where he is on all this.
Taiwan Student Movement
I’m learning more than I could ever imagine about current Taiwanese politics. And it’s fascinating. The old, crooked KMT party of Chiang-Kai-Shek is back in power because its predecessor opposition government was also mired in corruption.
But I love how the more democratic forces here in Taiwan are those most concerned about rapprochment with the Beijing regime. That’s the way it ought to be and am glad to see it. Here, democrats have no illusions about authoritarian regimes (unlike muddle-headed American lefties who can always find an apologia for this or that demagogue provided he is a bona fide anti-American).
For the past month a new student movement has been stirring here. It broke the surface a month ago when a high-ranking envoy from the mainland showed up and was met with student protests who, in turn, were met with a violent over-reaction from Taiwanese police. The students have been holding sit-ins and marches demanding the abolition of a law, dating back the period of military dictatorship here, that requires all protests be pre-approved by the government. The current President Ma, with an abysmal 25% popularity rating only 4 months into his term, is back-peddling before this thing gets out of control. He stepped on it big time last week when he said he this would not be a good time to have the Dalai Lama visit Taiwan — a stupid move that makes him appear to be kow-towing to the bullying of Beijing. The students have given themselves the colorful name of the Wild Strawberry Movement.
Cuban Repression
Ten days ago or so I razzed Sean Penn for the rather disgusting public tongue bath he lavished on the reptilian Stalinist Cuban leader Raul Castro. A seven-hour suck off session that left Penn feeling elated. At the time, I suggest we spend less time seeking political advice from the like of dazed Hollywood millionaires and more time celebrating fabulously fearless types like Cuban writer/blogger Yaoni Sanchez. Her lyrical writing has won world-wide recognition, except from the Americal Left who pointedly ignore her and anyone like her. Maybe I jinxed Yaoni because now we learn that last Wednesday she was called in for an appointment by Cuban state security agents, just as she was preparing to travel to a publicly organized conference of Cuban bloggers (some VERY brave people). Yaoni writes about her original citation here. And then details her meeting with the state-hired security thugs who openly threatened her with jail. You see, in Cuba, to write critically of society “asociates” you automatically with the “counter-revolution.” And all this time I thought Raul was the counter-revolution! Damn, how I wish I knew how to drum up some sort of solidarity movement with Yaoni and her confederates. Wouldn’t it be great if The Nation have her half as much space granted to Sean Penn’s babble?
OK, I’m off to bed early tonight. Gonna do some more scoping out of Taipei tomorrow. Another conference session on Wednesday and home for the weekend.
P.S. I was happy to rediscover, via the Web, my old compadre from El Salvador, Paolo Luers, where he still lives. Paolo had a long history linked to the Salvadoran revolutionary movement. That didn’t keep him from writing something similar to what I did about the Penn-Castro-Chavez menage a trois.
December 8th, 2008 at 6:33 am
Odd that a Cuban blogger (Yaoni) writes in English. Well, not so odd considering the fact that her audience is American anti-Communists and not the Cuban people.
December 8th, 2008 at 7:00 am
“the ambitious public investment and jobs program”
Unemployed bank tellers, store clerks, office workers, and the aged are going to have few opportunities in the announced construction programs. We evolved from a maufacturing base to that of finance, services, and technology a long time ago. This isn’t the 1930′s still.
Anyway, according to liberals over the past several years and those pandering for the Hispanic vote, the only people who will take those construction jobs are illegal Mexicans. Obama’s program may be just what Mexico needs to gain full employment.
December 8th, 2008 at 7:07 am
DJ: you are truly a troll and a rather disgusting one at that, I might add.”Interesting” as you put it that you are dumb enough to not notice that Yoani writes in Spanish and is the recipient of one of the most prestigious prizes given in the world of Spanish language literature! What you are reading is a translation done by volunteers. If you look closer you will notice she is translated into several languages. Her blog is absolutely viewable to Cubans — to the few to whom the Castro dictatorship allows internet access.
If you are implying something by the cowardly use of the word “interestingly” why dont you have the courage to just spit it out an make the caluminous accusation you are quite obviously suggesting?
I find your attitude no dfferent than the sort of mindset that marks scum that floats in the sphere of, say, a Dick Cheney if not a Pinochet. You side with the abusive and the all-powerful while disparaging and smearing those who have the courage to stand up to them. Something you clearly lack in your supine worship of an authoritarian state which allows NO civil liberties. One more post like this from you and you will be treated the way Cuban bloggers are — with banishment.
I can’t tell you the level of sickening repulsion you have just provoked in me.
December 8th, 2008 at 7:47 am
Here’s a link to her blog in Spanish.
She writes beautifully in Spanish, so well that I prefer to read her in Spanish.
Marc,
Did you see the NY Times Magazine cover story about Cuba by Roger Cohen? He interviewed Yaoni as well. It’s a good article.
December 8th, 2008 at 11:30 am
“more time celebrating fabulously fearless types like Cuban writer/blogger Yaoni Sanchez. Her lyrical writing has won world-wide recognition, except from the Americal Left who pointedly ignore her and anyone like her.”
On Penn/Cuba thread I raised this same issue about Arenas’ treatment.
And coincidental to Cuba I happened on a new think tank geek take on same at local library:
The Cuba Wars
Fidel Castro, The United States, and the Next Revolution
Daniel P Erikson
Senior Associate for US policy at the Inter-American Dialogue think tank.
????????????? Haven’t tucked in yet. Always suspicious when a think tank geek coughs up something. Cursory glance suggests at least some interesting details about how American interested parties have been operating…
December 8th, 2008 at 11:48 am
as to “rapprochment” with Beijing.., I am waiting for us HERE to take to the streets to boycott Chinese imports and the horror fest our gluttony for cheap goods has unleashed in China not to mention the effect of all the job losses in the US.
Just finished a cliche/clever/hipster superficial whip round China by one J Maarten Troost: Lost on Planet China.
Irritating and while confirming the literally apocalyptic conditions he fails to allow the human element to surface except as caricature and fodder for irony.
China comes across as one massive slaughterhouse. The general population rather cuckoo from no real contact with anything but a cracked sensibility and benumbed by the filth, pollution, cacaphony, ugliness. It was like imagining a teaming insect colony.
I remember only 30 years there was still some beauty left despite the scorch and burn policy of the Cultural Revolution.
Flying phlegm and writhing, tortured screaming animals seems to be the iconic signatures…with strange interludes in high tech otherworldly capsules of the selected, train station, airport or hotel.
But there is still one corner of the iconic China left where on can hike up to the Leaping Tiger Gorge. Clean air. Magnificent vistas.
December 8th, 2008 at 3:38 pm
Odd that a Cuban blogger (Yaoni) writes in English. Well, not so odd considering the fact that her audience is American anti-Communists and not the Cuban people.
It’s mighty suspicious, comrades. Does she even exist?
BTW, Mr. Slim, you’re an idiot.
December 8th, 2008 at 3:47 pm
Let us recall that this is the same Cuban blogger who told us her blog was being censored earlier this year. The same blogger who told us the “punk rocker” Gorki was being censored a bit later. These were both 100% fabricated “stories” – but ones that received a whole lot of press. The press did not have the same fervor in reporting the actual facts that contradicted both stories however. Primarily because of her false claims, she became a bit of a web-celebrity winning all sorts of international awards and even called one of Time Magazine’s top 100 something or another.
Now Yoani gives this account of what some authorities apparently told her about a meeting that took place (unimpeded) this weekend. She was told the problem was her associations, not her writings. I have no doubt about the legions of unsavory folks that have contacted Yoani since her rise to fame last year – both in Washington and Miami. What I don’t know is how she responded and what, if anything, it had to do with this conference. If you’ve read her blog as long as I have you would know she has a penchant for pushing the line. But like I said, the conference went forward, evidently with her online participation.
If action is ever taken against this blogger, we will judge the evidence against her under the law at the time. Cuba does have laws to protect itself from external subversion, put in place after Jesse Helms passed some legislation that authorized direct US assistance to people on the island it finds useful in its quest for regime change in Havana. Cuba could not reasonably permit the US Government and other groups with a terrorist history against it, to use its citizens in their plans for the island.
December 8th, 2008 at 4:04 pm
Hmmm did Riverbend’s disappearance coincide with the surfacing of Yoani?
December 8th, 2008 at 5:47 pm
Leftside changed his handle.
December 8th, 2008 at 5:58 pm
Av2Ts:
You are, sir, amoral jellyfish. Bravo for you! Protecting the all-powerful authoritarian but guilt-less state against the thunderous and possibly subversive words of a single blogger. My,my you have big cojones.
As I have said many times before on thos blog regarding folks like you, thank God in heaven your little hands are nowhere near the levers of real power.
We SHALL see, according to you, if Yoani shall or shall not be granted the right to continue thinking publicly. For if her thoughts shall be deemed by unelected stalinists to be “subversive” to he sacred Cuban state then she will be dutifully punished under the rules of the pristine Cuban justice system. And trained seals like you will obediently clap their flippers.
My god, the stench is overpowering.
BTW, idiot, the conference DID NOT go forward if u read her dispatch. It was suspended and went forward online making it impossible for the goons in State Security to nab everyone.
And who in the fug do you KNOW what her “associations’ are? We know she is associated with Reporters Without Borders, and the jury of the Ortega y Gasset prize for Spanish literature. What you DO know, in your pea brain, is that anyone who encouages any opposition to Cuba’s totalitarian system is either objectively a counter-revolutionary or a tool of the U.S. empire, right?
Revolting. I see no difference between you and a fascist except that you hide behind anonymity.
December 8th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
Wow. I merely pointed out 1) that Yoani has an unfortunate history of lying about just this issue (and has been rewarded mightily), 2) why Cuba has laws to prevent association with subversive foreign organs, and that 3) Yoani may or many not have been getting too close to some with her heightened associations. I did not render judgement. For that I get called revolting pea brain, idiot, smelly, trained seal, amoral jellywish. Nice.
It would have been more productive if you’d tried responding to one of my 3 points. Perhaps you are hesitant because you bought into Yoani’s earlier misinformation and believe the US and (truly) fascist groups in Miami have the right to utilize bloggers and “independent journalists” to try to foment a counter-revolution in Cuba. But Cuba does not have to allow this and can not be expected to – particularly not with the devastation of the hurricanes, the 50th Anniversary of the Revolution in 3 weeks, the last days of Bush and with him, the re-conquest dreams of so many crazies in Miami).
December 8th, 2008 at 8:56 pm
To respond to some of your nonsense: The Castro’s are proud Marxist-Leninists, but not Stalinists. Fidel has always gone out of his way to piss on Stalin (check his recent biography, where he says he was more critical of Stalin than “trotskyite” Che). And true, the Castro’s are not elected county-wide but they always have received the highest vote totals of any elected officials in Cuba, in their respective municipalities. They are then elected up the ladder by their peers in the Congress and Council of State.
And I am not sure why you chastise me for noting that the conference went forward with Yoani’s online participation but then admit “It went forward online.” Clearly there was also a (small) gathering in Pinar Del Rio. The gathering produced a plan of action and a press communique.
And I am not against Yoani – if going forward she shows the ethics I hope that she has. I am against the US policies and Miami actions that force Cuba to act in its defense. I think Yoani is an individual who was pushing things as far as she could, almost for the sport of it. In fact, if I recall correctly her very first post (now missing) in 2006 flatly said her goal in coming back to Cuba and starting that blog was the find out where the limits were. Well, she may have found them, but they have nothing to do with her writings. Even Yoani, does not make that assertion.
December 9th, 2008 at 2:06 am
Raúl Castro was re-elected from the 2nd Eastern Front with 99.37% of the vote and Fidel Castro was re-elected from the 7th District of Santiago de Cuba with 98.26% of the vote. Vice-President Carlos Lage and President of the Assembly Ricardo Alarcón respectively won their seats with 92.40% and 93.92% of the vote.[
Har! Stalin did better, I think.
December 9th, 2008 at 2:23 am
Bob,,, “Interesting” how those vote percentages so clkosely match the IQ of AV2TS. No accident, comrade.
The Castro bros are neither Marxists, Leninists nor Stalinists. They are CASTROISTS. Fifty years in power shared by two brothers? In Haiti or Nicaragua we would call that a one family dictatorship. But of course Cuba is different because as you help point out… these guys were elected. Even though there are no real electiions and only one party. You see if there were an opposition party the US empire could trick the Cubans into voting for a govt they dont really want. Stupid Cubans, you know. Thank God the Castro family is there to keep them in line.
December 9th, 2008 at 6:44 am
Cooper: “In Haiti or Nicaragua we would call that a one family dictatorship.”
Well, in Haiti and Nicaragua young people were tortured or thrown out of helicopters for opposing the government. In Cuba, the only people who are punished are those who get cash and marching orders from the CIA–the very people Cooper adulates.
December 9th, 2008 at 7:05 am
Considering you’ve only been there a few days, it is understandable, but your understanding of Taiwanese politics is pretty deficient. The divide in Taiwan politics is an ethnic one between people who consider themselves Chinese and people who consider themselves Taiwanese. Those who consider themselves Chinese are descendents of the mainlanders who arrived in late forties, some of whom married people already on the island. The people who consider themselves “Taiwanese” descend from people who arrived on the island several hundred years ago from Fujian province and mixed over time with the indigenous peoples. They also tend to look fondly back on the 55 year occupation by Japan.
The number of “Taiwanese” outnumber the “Chinese”, but the KMT also gets a good many votes from people who see the pro-Taiwanese, pro-independence forces as jeopardizing the de facto independence of Taiwan, and isolating Taiwan economically, with their endless rhetoric about the need for de jure independence, and against trade with China.
An apt analogy with Taiwan: imagine FDR dies a couple years early, Henry Wallace becomes Prez, one way or another there is a communist takeover of USA. A non-commie government in exile is formed in…Puerto Rico, or Hawaii. A bunch of anglos come over, declare martial law for forty years or so, style themselves as the USA in exile.
Wild Strawberry movement are DPP activists if I am not mistaken. That’s groovy. But keep in mind…DPP has only about 1/4 of the seats in their parliament.
December 9th, 2008 at 10:47 am
Cooper ignores the issues again. I understand why…
Instead he finds it necessary to say that Fidel is not a Marxist-Leninist because the Cuban revolution did not copy Soviet Russia. He is partially right, as Cuba certainly charted its own path.
And again he dismisses Cuban participatory democracy, which is about a whole lot more than just one day every 4 years (like the US). In Cuba, workers have an official say at their workplace. In Cuba, the education and political conscience is one of the highest in the world. In Cuba, the Party has nothing to do with the elections (a quarter of those elected have no affiliation). In Cuba, real people from the community are nominated by their peers in local grass-roots assemblies. Most are orrdinary workers, who volunteer for their political post. In Cuba, there is no money in politics. Voters base their decisions on a simple resume and list of accomplishments. At the end, in the voting booth, every Cuban citizen over 16 (including criminals) has the right to vote to decide whether to approve or deny the representative. The fact that so many vote (more than 90%) and agree with the selection is testament to a system that has more going for it than we think. If not, there would be tons more lethargy, No votes or spoiled ballots. In fact, the approval of the system in overwhelming, which matches the notions of anyone who really talks to the people in Cuba – and not rely on the handful of (often paid) opposition.
December 9th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
My absolute favorite defense of the autocrat is the appeal to their joke elections as if they are real, or they matter at any level beyond the farcical. Well done av2ts.
It’s kind of like trying to defend adultery by appealing to how few people you actually cheated with: At that point, who gives a shit?
December 9th, 2008 at 1:38 pm
So tell us why DanO, so many Cubans (in a secret ballot) choose to support their electoral process by voting “Yes” for their candidate? Wouldn’t voting no or spoiling the ballots be an appropriate response for those who feel the process is a farce?? Many do in fact stay home, vote against the ticket or spoil their ballots, but that total is less than 10%. What does that tell you, when the US abstention rate is still more than 50%?? Perhaps they have a history of trusting their Government because (get this) the Government works for the people and not some misguided notion called free market capitalism.
December 9th, 2008 at 1:55 pm
So tell us why DanO, so many Cubans (in a secret ballot) choose to support their electoral process by voting “Yes” for their candidate? Wouldn’t voting no or spoiling the ballots be an appropriate response for those who feel the process is a farce??
Were international observers there to observe the fairness of the election?
Somehow I doubt it as the Castros’ Cuba is the only nation in the Western hemisphere that will not allow the ICRC visit their prisons and has refused visas for AI and HRW delegations since 1989.
December 9th, 2008 at 5:10 pm
Randy, so you think the Cubans are making up their abstention numbers and voting tabulations because no one from the West is there to observe? What an Imperialist notion. Did Bush allow in election observers, as was requested this last Election – No. And if the authorities were in the business of making up election results, do you think they’d pick such high numbers (in the 80s and 90s)?
If you can find me one citation of one person alleging fraud in the counting of Cuban ballots maybe I’ll consider that a serious reply. Even dissidents don’t allege such things because they know how popular the Castro’s and the Revolution remain. Mother Jones’ other posterboy for a dissident – Pedro Luis Ferrer – admits his appreciation for the Revolution.
Doesn’t the fact that there has been not one instance of upheaval, of a rebellious act, since Fidel has passed on the leadership role tell you something? Even the dissidents admit they are a tiny minority and have a long way to go to “educate” their fellow citizens.
December 9th, 2008 at 6:03 pm
I go out of my way to avoid having dunderhead ideologues in my life like Av2ts. They bore me, because speaking to them is like trying to debate with the Jehova Witness knocking at ur door. I’ll be damned if Im gonna pay bandwith charges for any more of his tripe. Either I will charge him a buck a post fom now on or he can post his crud on a Cuban blog– if he can find one.
Claiming that Cuban elections are really elections is akin to saying the earth is flat. Plse go away. Now.
BY the way, comrade, there are rebeliious acts everyday in Cuba. They range from people stealing state fasctories blind (a common practice) to open demonstrations like the one yesterday by women celebrating HUman Rights Day in Havana who were immediately packed into police vans and carted away. That doesnt count the million or so people willing to ride rafts thru shark infested waters to get off the freedom island you describe. No, thats no act of rebellion. Thats just crass consumerism, right wing gusanos coming to the US because they want to buy, um, food.
December 9th, 2008 at 6:20 pm
To White Cornerback
This is the beauty of the Web. From 10,000 miles away you can tell me all about the country Ive actually been visiting for the l;ast eight days! Sorry to disappoint you but, um, well, I already knew 100% of what you were so kind to lecture me on. I have spent all of my time this past week with ardent Taiwanese as well with numerous other ethnic groups and even aboriginals. So, sorry, I fully understand the racial divide that marks all politics here on the island. We can even discuss the 228 incident and its historical repercussions, after u look it up.
December 9th, 2008 at 6:51 pm
Cool, Marc.. I had heard of the 1947 uprising but need to learn more and didn’t know the name. Though I would begin any discussion by noting that Mao would have been an even nastier invader than Chiang Kai-Shek. Unfortunately, the wiki article on 228 says “neutrality disputed”! Which seems to be the way most everything connected with that island works: less facts, more opinions. But thank you. Damn good food, best in Asia I think.
December 9th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
Randy, so you think the Cubans are making up their abstention numbers and voting tabulations because no one from the West is there to observe? What an Imperialist notion.
Oh please. Don’t patronize me. There’s nothing imperialist about it. It’s called healthy skepticism and it’s a lot healthier than your wholesale swallowing of everything Fidel does. When he pukes do you hold his beard out of the way?
I notice that you didn’t dispute the issues regarding the ICRC, AI and HRW. Facts are troublesome things for you, aren’t they.
Just wondering why do you call yourself av2ts here and leftside at Boz’s blog?
December 10th, 2008 at 11:28 am
Randy, I am all for healthy skepticism, but not for the sake of it (that is cynicism). I know Cuba well and have been merely pointing out the multitudes of misinformation that exists on the topic. If anyone thinks I am wrong about any particular fact, they can challenge it. Instead I get off topic rants that attempt to obfuscate the issues at hand. And then I get threatened with being banned… the irony.
Again, I just do not accept that some groups that do not even consider such basic things as health care, housing, food and education human rights needs to go around the world telling people why they are insufficiently liberal. The UN Human Rights watchdog was allowed in last year – and got a pretty steller report. Cuba let journalists inspect prisons in 2004. They make US prisons look like Guantanamo.
Here is what the Undersecretary General of the UN said about Cuba last year: She called Cuba an example for the world as the government’s set health, education and the people’s well-being as its priorities, and that Cuba’s social achievements are worthy to be shared with other developing nations. “Cuba is a nation that knows sustainable development. We want to find out how to share experiences and ideas with other developing nations,” she said.
My blog name is Leftside: A View to the South (AV2tS). I use the handles interchangibly, though I am leaning towards the latter lately.
December 10th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Again, I just do not accept that some groups that do not even consider such basic things as health care, housing, food and education human rights needs to go around the world telling people why they are insufficiently liberal.
So if free universal health care, affordable housing, access to food and education was all established in the US are we to believe that you would be willing to accept limits on what you can read, your right to peacefully assemble, access to the internet, access to media, the ability to publish what you wished to publish, the requirement to obtain an exit visa to leave the US, limits on where and if you could travel?
As for journalists visiting the prison, the level of your credulousness is frankly, robotic. The ICRC is an independent non-partisan organization designated to enforce conditions under the Geneva Conventions. They are the sort that knows the difference between a real inspection and a Potemkin Village inspection. Yet Cuba refuses to alow them to inspect their prisons.
As for citing the UN, Ms. Tibaijuka is with the Habitat Division, not with the UNHCHR. Here’s what the UNHCHR said in a recent report:
The Cuban Foreign Minister, refused to respond other than to say that it did not recognize the UNHCHR mandate with regard to Cuba.
BTW, one of those organizations you chided, Human Rights Watch, was one of the recipients of the 2008 UN Human Rights Award.
Nice cherry-picking on your part. You’re a master of elision.
December 10th, 2008 at 4:48 pm
Almost exactly a year ago (human rights day) Cuba signed the legally binding UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. They also promised to cooperate fully with the special rappateour from the UN Human Rights Commission (UNHCHR), including site visits. This came after the old US-led UN Human Rights Commission rules were modified so that all countries receive the same objective scrutiny (rather than the selective basis previously). So you will have your inspection this coming year.
And no, Cuba’s granting of full social and cultural rights does not mean we can accept a lesser standard on civil and political rights. But neither does the opposite hold true in regards to the US Government, who does all they can (completely alone in the world) to prevent the right to food, housing and health care from entering the debate.
By the way, the most onerous “exit visa” requirement (requiring a letter of invitation) is on the way out as well, according to El Pais.
I happen to trust the reporting of Tracey Eaton, from the Dallas Morning News. If you are calling her a dupe regarding her experience with the Cuban prison system, that is between you and her. Did you read her article??
December 11th, 2008 at 8:20 am
Almost exactly a year ago (human rights day) Cuba signed the legally binding UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
So if Raúl violates the ICCPR, who do the Cuban people go to for redress?
December 11th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
Under the provisions of the First Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, citizens from a State Party are able to lodge individual complaints to the United Nations Human Rights Committee in relation to human rights abuses that they have suffered and for which they have exhausted domestic legal remedies without gaining redress.
December 11th, 2008 at 7:54 pm
Under the provisions of the First Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, citizens from a State Party are able to lodge individual complaints to the United Nations Human Rights Committee in relation to human rights abuses that they have suffered and for which they have exhausted domestic legal remedies without gaining redress.
And no doubt the Cuban government will allow for this?
You’ll swallow anything.
December 16th, 2010 at 1:53 pm
I had chosen a that devises a qualification for a.
January 17th, 2011 at 1:29 pm
I feel am having some issues with accessing this blog in previous Firefox.