<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Que Sarah Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siya Kapur</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610099</link>
		<dc:creator>Siya Kapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610099</guid>
		<description>Great headline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great headline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610012</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610012</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?&lt;/i&gt;

My first experience with &quot;conservatism&quot; was the opposition to California&#039;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so ... I woulda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Who’da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of “conservatism” in the 21st Century ?</i></p>
<p>My first experience with &#8220;conservatism&#8221; was the opposition to California&#8217;s civil rights and fair housing acts in 1959, so &#8230; I woulda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-610011</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-610011</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s not what you meant to say -- perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what you meant to say &#8212; perhaps you overestimate your own intelligence? And the claim is hyperbolic in both directions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorri Sturlusson</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609977</link>
		<dc:creator>Snorri Sturlusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609977</guid>
		<description>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#039;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#039;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#039;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    

Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#039;ll be ready for them.

The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  - voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#039;s imbecile son.  We&#039;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody ever went broke overestimating the intelligence of the public.  Palin will get a syndicated radio show (or maybe replace Rush next time he gets busted) or perhaps become a color commentator on Fox.  That&#8217;s a much better platform than being Governor of Alaska.  I&#8217;d bet most voters in the 48 don&#8217;t even remember now that she ever was a governor, and her resignation will mean exactly zero by 2012.    </p>
<p>Once Obama has done a little damage control on the worst aspects of the disastrous legacy of 30 years of conservative rule, our Bible thumping neighbors will be ready for another round.  She&#8217;ll be ready for them.</p>
<p>The GOP loves ignorant yahoos  &#8211; voters identify with them, and the corporate string pullers have an easy time controlling them.  Palin is just as suited for office as that actor who played straight man to a chimp, and substantially more charismatic than George HW Bush&#8217;s imbecile son.  We&#8217;ll still have her to kick around for a long time to come,  assuming no sex scandals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609973</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609973</guid>
		<description>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoakster nice to see you back on board and hopefully as long as that crazy bald head is here, you, too, will stick around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GM Hoakster</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609972</link>
		<dc:creator>GM Hoakster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609972</guid>
		<description>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am willing to bet that Roper will soon be slang for total shithead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609971</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609971</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &quot;conservatism&quot; in the 21st Century ?  I&#039;m not a conservative, but it&#039;s embarrassing that they can&#039;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#039;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#039;cuz we&#039;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#039;re down because (a) they&#039;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#039;s possible they&#039;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;da thunk that self-absorption, narcissism, laziness and willful ignorance would become the hallmarks of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; in the 21st Century ?  I&#8217;m not a conservative, but it&#8217;s embarrassing that they can&#8217;t get their shit more together.  Maybe it&#8217;s a conspiracy to make liberals lazy and then hit us with the double whammy, &#8216;cuz we&#8217;ve been hauling ass and kicking butt in recent years. My suggestion is that we keep kicking them when they&#8217;re down because (a) they&#8217;d do it to us and (b) nobody could be this stupid and it&#8217;s possible they&#8217;ve got some kind of secret long-shot plan to re-bamboozle America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609970</guid>
		<description>&quot;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&quot;

Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&amp;search_type=&amp;aq=f</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura’s.&#8221;</p>
<p>Speaking of the former wrestler turned governor, who I am not much of a fan of, he recently appeared on the View and I must say that he, rightfully, schooled the right winger, destroying her pro tortire apologetics. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ventura+the+view&#038;search_type=&#038;aq=f</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crosby</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609966</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609966</guid>
		<description>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#039; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#039;m not fond of Purdum--I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &quot;thoughtful&quot; in Socks&#039; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#039;t think we need to repeat the litany.  

Say this about Purdum&#039;s piece--he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)--anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#039;s residence, is responded to by her &quot;staff&quot; with the same ferocity.  

Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, I read both of Dr. Socks&#8217; posts and they really say the same thing.  I&#8217;m not fond of Purdum&#8211;I think he is far more of a northeastern elitist than he is a misogynist.  As I recall he raked Bill Clinton over the same coals that roasted Palin.  I agree with reg that there is little that I would consider &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in Socks&#8217; pieces.  At the risk of repeating myself once again, whatever you think of Purdum, Schmidt or the piece, Palin is under-educated, half-bright and, it appears, narcissistic beyond the bounds of typical office-holding narcissism.  I realize these are just assertions, but there is so much that she has done and said just in the past year to justify it that I don&#8217;t think we need to repeat the litany.  </p>
<p>Say this about Purdum&#8217;s piece&#8211;he makes the Palins sound a lot like a Jerry Springer couple, and that might be unfair.  Except that she does in fact get down in the mud and wrestle with the Johnstons and all the rest of the seamier detractors.  That is a function of the narcissism (or self-centeredness, or ego or whatever you wish to call it)&#8211;anything negative said about her, whether it is about her national security bona fides or Levi Johnston&#8217;s residence, is responded to by her &#8220;staff&#8221; with the same ferocity.  </p>
<p>Sarah Barracuda Palin is an interesting and charismatic person.  As an office-holder and public policy spokesperson, she has not yet made the jump from Lester Maddox level to Jesse Ventura&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609963</guid>
		<description>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just skimming through at it looks like GM suggested that he supported the Lilly Ledbetter act (equal pay for equal work).  Does anyone else remember GM offering such support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609957</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609957</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: 

&quot;It&#039;s all politics. It&#039;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#039;t think anything about it. But I&#039;m telling ya, all it&#039;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away - because they know exactly what it is - this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history - and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame...&quot;

Roper and Bill Cliinton - two peas in a pod. Who&#039;da thunk ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Roper and other Palin-fans have been circulating the following criticism of Todd Purham from one of his harshest critics on their blogs: </p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s all politics. It&#8217;s all about the bias of the media for Obama. Don&#8217;t think anything about it. But I&#8217;m telling ya, all it&#8217;s doing is driving her supporters further and further away &#8211; because they know exactly what it is &#8211; this has been the most rigged coverage in modern history &#8211; and the guy ought to be ashamed of himself. But he has no shame&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Roper and Bill Cliinton &#8211; two peas in a pod. Who&#8217;da thunk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609954</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 06:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609954</guid>
		<description>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roper is an idiot and his atempt to flex his feminist credentials is absurd, particularly since his blog is home to rampant xenphobia, narrow forms of false nationalism, a racist and homophobic co blogger and other forms of kindred stupidity. Besides, doesnt Hillary have a far greater claim to mistreatment than Palin and somehow I doubt Roper and his ideological kin were busy forwarding these arguments in her defence. Removed from a proximity to power, which he could at least claim during the Bush years, Wooster and Rope have become silly carricatures and clowns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609953</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609953</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes&lt;/i&gt;

Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?

&lt;i&gt;I’m betting you can’t &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &quot;bets&quot; but never actually puts anything on the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>why don’t you attack the points the self described radical feminist makes</i></p>
<p>Roper, you are dumber than words can describe. All I did was mention what an unctuous suckup brownnosing ingratiating phony you are. Why the fuck would I want to waste my time attacking or defending the garbage you dredge up?</p>
<p><i>I’m betting you can’t </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re a cowardly piece of shit who makes phony &#8220;bets&#8221; but never actually puts anything on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609952</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.&lt;/i&gt;

Is your name Roper, moron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Awwwwwww, I betcha you felt right clever when you came up wth them lines. Unctuous? Don’t rightly know ’bout that word, kiddo.</i></p>
<p>Is your name Roper, moron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Grocholski</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609951</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Grocholski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609951</guid>
		<description>PSA if no one minds...
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#039;s friend Bill Bradley...

US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &quot;all Georigans.&quot;  

Obama&#039;s been steady.

Bill&#039;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.

Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSA if no one minds&#8230;<br />
OK, more of a plug for Marc&#8217;s friend Bill Bradley&#8230;</p>
<p>US/Russian Summit this week.  Considering events in Georgia less than a year ago, the positions of the 2 nations are uniquely  different then they were when Americans learned we were, or could be, &#8220;all Georigans.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s been steady.</p>
<p>Bill&#8217;s got a lot of good feeds, links, etc.  Make sure to check it out.</p>
<p>Now to move the laundry to the dryer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609950</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609950</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless...waste of everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for even posting any comments re: Roper and the Crazy Train. Pointless&#8230;waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-2/#comment-609949</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609949</guid>
		<description>Okay - I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is a nutbag.  Roper - you really can pick &#039;em. You&#039;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#039;s lame act ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay &#8211; I also read enough of the other link to confirm that &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is a nutbag.  Roper &#8211; you really can pick &#8216;em. You&#8217;ve actually found the leftwing version of the nitwits and  cranks who circle the wagons on your own blog. Is this your best shot in defending Palin&#8217;s lame act ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609948</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609948</guid>
		<description>I have no idea who &quot;reclusive leftist&quot; is but that is a derange rant - maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#039;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &quot;if it has a dick, don&#039;t hire it&quot; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &quot;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&quot;  isn&#039;t too surprising - except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &quot;thoughtful&quot; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &quot;thoughtful&quot; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#039;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that - but not our old friend from GM&#039;s Nuthouse....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea who &#8220;reclusive leftist&#8221; is but that is a derange rant &#8211; maybe Steve Schmidt is an asshole and hates women, but there&#8217;s nothing but an assertion of that by a nutball who says crazy shit like &#8220;if it has a dick, don&#8217;t hire it&#8221; and then complains about other people being prejudiced against certain genitalia. That Roper has descended into the kind of mindlessn ess that says, &#8220;Anything anyone says smearing whoever has disappointed my, no matter how obviously deranged works, for me!&#8221;  isn&#8217;t too surprising &#8211; except that his scope of horseshit now includes dranged leftists.  Roper calling that piece &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; is, frankly, bizarre.  What is &#8220;thoughtful&#8221; in that tirade, and what evidence are the accusations based on ? There&#8217;s nothing there except the most superficial and prejudicial ranting.   Any sane person would be embarrassed by crap like that &#8211; but not our old friend from GM&#8217;s Nuthouse&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609947</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 02:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609947</guid>
		<description>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to bore people with this, but thanks again. I probably have to make some time for physical therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/que-sarah-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-609946</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 01:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2802#comment-609946</guid>
		<description>GM, you bloated blogger you!  If anyone has drank kool aid it is YOU.  You are willing to follow the Republican Party off of the cliff.  Palin&#039;s action CANNOT be defended.  She is either a delusion narcissist, greedy, or simply inept.  Either way, you will defender he and your broken party till the end.  

Your loony blogging in regards to Obama clearly points to your own lack of mental stability.  You were frothing at the mouth with absurd accusation of &quot;marxism&quot; and &quot;racism.&quot;  You could not engage in honest criticism.

Look, we all try and construct meaning in our lives.   Food is clearly very important to you.  Next is this mythical narrative of &quot;conservatism&quot; is central to your identity.  So it makes sense that you cannot or will not see things clearly.  You are of the Loony right.  As delusional as Pacifica Radio listeners are to the left.  

It is pointless to argue because you are not a man of principals.  Rather you are a follower.  Someone who would drink the Kook Aid if Fox News told you to.  It is a pointless argument, this is religion.  

Just stop eating so much so you will not be so fat.  People might want to look at you then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GM, you bloated blogger you!  If anyone has drank kool aid it is YOU.  You are willing to follow the Republican Party off of the cliff.  Palin&#8217;s action CANNOT be defended.  She is either a delusion narcissist, greedy, or simply inept.  Either way, you will defender he and your broken party till the end.  </p>
<p>Your loony blogging in regards to Obama clearly points to your own lack of mental stability.  You were frothing at the mouth with absurd accusation of &#8220;marxism&#8221; and &#8220;racism.&#8221;  You could not engage in honest criticism.</p>
<p>Look, we all try and construct meaning in our lives.   Food is clearly very important to you.  Next is this mythical narrative of &#8220;conservatism&#8221; is central to your identity.  So it makes sense that you cannot or will not see things clearly.  You are of the Loony right.  As delusional as Pacifica Radio listeners are to the left.  </p>
<p>It is pointless to argue because you are not a man of principals.  Rather you are a follower.  Someone who would drink the Kook Aid if Fox News told you to.  It is a pointless argument, this is religion.  </p>
<p>Just stop eating so much so you will not be so fat.  People might want to look at you then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

