For instance, do you really think Biden would come out on top in debate with Governor Palin? If so, you must not have read the background on her achievments that are freely available.

She has accomplished more in her professional political career than the entire inventory of the Obama / Biden collective.

She will kick Joe’s ass in the debates.

Your being way to kind to PT there reg. He’s clearly having trouble passing through adolescence. As my mother used to say to me at that age, “You’d argue with a signpost”

That statement is enough for me. Thank you and have a good evening.

Sorry it took so long for me to to chime in, chalk it up to the warm feeling I get in my pants from reading your lucid, insightful and well reasoned discourse. Now take your ball and go home, asshole.

Forever yours,

SAW

Feel free to email me: ikoe@hotmail.com but let’s drop this from the boards here.

In the middle of a sincere but critical exchange Dan O wrongly accused me of acting in bad faith. In response I gave him a deserved “fuck you”, and then explained exactly what my reasoning had been and how I had misunderstood his intent. Misunderstanding is not bad faith. That should be the end of it, but Dan O is “pissed”, poor thing, and is apparently incapable doing, as he put it, the adult thing, or of reading and comprehending my explanation of his character flaw, which he has since magnified.

“you’re both smart and informed guys with good points; it’s silly for you to attack each other personally.”

Haven’t followed all the bouncing balls in this exchange, but that wasn’t bad advice.

How many of them have you groundlessly accused of acting in bad faith? Again … fuck you for that.

Yes, it would.

Quite a double standard you have there, when he accused me of bad faith and of shitting myself like a child. My responses were quite within the bounds he created.

You said more immediately after you said you would say no more … that was enough to make you a petty liar.

What I did was interpret you charitably. There isn’t any question at all that Palin is adamantly “pro-life”, so your “If these sorts of things are true” is nonsensical if it includes that. I assumed that you were distinguishing between the Palin having the sort of pro-life view that Harry Reid has, and a much more radical view of wanting to criminalize birth control. So, because of your admittedly faulty communication, I misunderstood your intent. But, like some giant ahole, you took your being annoyed by my response as meaning I’m acting in bad faith. That’s a rather serious character flaw on your part that you should attend to.