<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least $2 billion and could rise to $9 billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least $2 billion and could rise to $9 billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Sick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/sick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: passing through</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607911</link>
		<dc:creator>passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 21:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607911</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.&lt;/i&gt;

Cracked pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The joke is these vaccinations are very questionable– as is the amount of mercury and aluminum hydroxide used in them.</i></p>
<p>Cracked pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607872</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607872</guid>
		<description>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>36,000 a year die of regular flu. Is that an imminent pandemic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607871</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607871</guid>
		<description>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#039;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. 

As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.

I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.

I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#039;t touch your face. Take your C etc.

This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, WHO has now declared we have an imminent pandemic! 132 cases and one death (outside Mexico) makes a pandemic. This is the worst sci fi scenario being conjured. Its outrageous. First the bullshit Tamiflu and Relenza is being bought by gov&#8217;t and distributed while pharma is being given gazillions to concoct a vaccine so we can all be poisoned. </p>
<p>As the Guardian columnist suggests more people die of hospital superbugs that nothing is being done about.</p>
<p>I mean this is like so fucking Orwellian.</p>
<p>I just plead with all of you on the forum to NOT be suckered into having a flu shot.  Wash your hands. Don&#8217;t touch your face. Take your C etc.</p>
<p>This is the most infuriating, blatant bunch of bull in the history of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607857</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607857</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure we totally see eye to eye on this, Anna, but point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607853</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607853</guid>
		<description>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument is called grasping for straws, Pokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607852</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607852</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll - did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#039;s views on &quot;most issues&quot; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &quot;about right.&quot;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &quot;liberal&quot;, &quot;moderate&quot; or &quot;conservative&quot; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans - who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ, pokey, you had to scroll through an awful lot of counter-evidence to get to your last, very weak item in that poll &#8211; did you even bother to read the part where nearly two-thirds of the people think Obama&#8217;s views on &#8220;most issues&#8221; are neither too liberal, nor too conservative but &#8220;about right.&#8221;   That speaks volumes more than whether folks choose &#8220;liberal&#8221;, &#8220;moderate&#8221; or &#8220;conservative&#8221; on the tail end of a very comprehensive poll that shows enormous approval for Obama and his agenda, and considerably more approval of Dems than a right-wing policy agenda and the Republicans &#8211; who are pretty much living in shit city if that poll is even close to accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607851</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607851</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &quot;self-defined&quot; and don&#039;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &quot;conservative majority&quot; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance - which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#039;m a left-liberal for very &quot;conservative&quot; reasons, incidentally - so, Voila! - this Obama-loving lefty is &quot;conservative&quot;.  There&#039;s nothing less &quot;conservative&quot; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &quot;atheistic and materialist&quot; - and contemptuously elitist - than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m arguing with you because you leave out the word &#8220;self-defined&#8221; and don&#8217;t deal realistically with policies that most Americans support. If this was a &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; country, you guy would have been able to destroy Social Security and there would be no prospect of universal health insurance &#8211; which is going to happen.  What people call themselves when faced with a poll question is irrelevant.  (I&#8217;m a left-liberal for very &#8220;conservative&#8221; reasons, incidentally &#8211; so, Voila! &#8211; this Obama-loving lefty is &#8220;conservative&#8221;.  There&#8217;s nothing less &#8220;conservative&#8221; than free-market capitalism, incidentally. Nor any crowd more &#8220;atheistic and materialist&#8221; &#8211; and contemptuously elitist &#8211; than those Ayn Rand-loving, snot-nosed libertarians. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607850</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607850</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &quot;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&quot; the WHO cautioned: &quot;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&quot; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#039;s Royal Society added bluntly: &quot;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&quot; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).
 
Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#039;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &quot;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#039;building for demand&#039; for pandemic preparedness but &#039;suboptimal utilization&#039; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&quot; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &quot;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#039;pandemic preparedness&#039; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&quot; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).
 
The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#039; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).
 
The same scenario could happen again. &quot;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#039;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&quot; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &quot;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&quot; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&quot;  
  http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news

And in today&#039;s Guardian this opinion piece:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many experts have warned that the only way to expand flu-vaccine manufacturing capacity is to get governments to pay for it. In its 2004 &#8220;Consultation on priority public health interventions before and during an influenza pandemic,&#8221; the WHO cautioned: &#8220;Industry has little incentive to build additional manufacturing capacity, which requires very large long-term investments for an event that occurs only rarely and unpredictably.&#8221; (See Bibliography: WHO 2004) Last year, Britain&#8217;s Royal Society added bluntly: &#8220;It is not commercially viable for the vaccine industry to commit the necessary resources to scale up production in advance of a pandemic when there is no existing market, the threat of a pandemic may be years away and the risk in any single year may be considered to be low&#8221; (see Bibliography: Royal Society 2006).</p>
<p>Creating enough vaccine-manufacturing capacity to protect the world&#8217;s population is not cheap. The price tag is likely to be at least  billion and could rise to  billion, according to a WHO estimate (see Bibliography: WHO 2006: Global pandemic influenza action plan). Experts within the vaccine industry say that expecting manufacturers to make the investment asks companies to spend against their own best interest. &#8220;In the US market alone by the year 2010 there could be a surplus capacity resulting from &#8216;building for demand&#8217; for pandemic preparedness but &#8216;suboptimal utilization&#8217; based on significantly lesser demand for seasonal vaccines,&#8221; an engineer and two strategists from the Danish biotech firm NNE PharmaPlan wrote in the industry journal BioPharm International. &#8220;In Europe, Asia and the rest of the world, planned future capacities for &#8216;pandemic preparedness&#8217; would have to address how potential surplus capacities can be effectively used in markets where there is little or no demand for seasonal vaccines&#8221; (see Bibliography: Thomas 2007).</p>
<p>The United States has already experienced the aftermath of vaccine companies&#8217; feeling overextended. Between 1998 and 2002, two of the four companies that then supplied seasonal flu vaccine left the market, citing losses on investment and increased regulatory demands. In the 2000-01 and 2003-04 flu seasons, the country experienced significant shortages of flu vaccine, with long lines, panic buying, price-gouging, and subsequent congressional investigations (see Bibliography: GAO 2001, 2004; Grady 2004).</p>
<p>The same scenario could happen again. &#8220;The U.S. will have a serious problem if the pandemic doesn&#8217;t strike in the next couple of years, because interest will decline and demand will go down again,&#8221; said Hedwig Kresse, an associate analyst for infectious diseases with the British-based market analysts Datamonitor. &#8220;Governments will have to guarantee a certain sales volume to keep [manufacturers] in the market and to keep these capacities up&#8221; (see Bibliography: Kresse 2007).&#8221;<br />
  <a href="http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news" rel="nofollow">http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/biz-plan/news</a></p>
<p>And in today&#8217;s Guardian this opinion piece:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/apr/29/swine-flu-mexico-uk-media1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607840</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”&lt;/i&gt;

reg,


Don&#039;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>“There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals”</i></p>
<p>reg,</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t argue with me argue with me, argue with the poll Randy Pauls linked to.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_042609.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607839</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607839</guid>
		<description>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm

I think this is creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops meant to put in the BBC article link fromn 2006</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/5385894.stm</a></p>
<p>I think this is creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Churchill</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607838</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Churchill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607838</guid>
		<description>Mavis, I don&#039;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past...but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.

You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. 

Note this 2006 BBC article:

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html

And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.

This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. 

There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.

I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.

One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mavis, I don&#8217;t disparage the eradication of disease through the use of vaccines in the past&#8230;but there are a lot of scientific studies about the current use of vaccines and the associated problems.</p>
<p>You want a flu shot, girl, you get yourself one. </p>
<p>Note this 2006 BBC article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic.html</a></p>
<p>And there is another New Scientist article also discussing the recent resurrection and study of the 1918 pandemic as being lethal because of bacterial pneumonia and anti biotics being the more important weapon.</p>
<p>This is a bullshit engineered panic. The bug got out either on purpose or by accident. </p>
<p>There are several legit older stories on Tamiflu etc not even being effective on the strains its often hauled out for etc etc.</p>
<p>I am addressing the current controversy around vaccine use and the lack of ethics by big pharma.</p>
<p>One has to be vigilant and use common sense. Modern medicine is miraculous and people are unscrupulous if there is a buck to be made. And, uh, the unscrupulousness of the pharmaceutical industry is hardly a fringe idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qdpsteve</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607835</link>
		<dc:creator>qdpsteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607835</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.&lt;/b&gt;

Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>In principle, I also support vigorous pubic health preventive measures.</b></p>
<p>Larry Craig will be grateful to hear it, Marc. <img src='http://marccooper.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607834</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607834</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&quot;

  Bullshit - try pushing a &quot;conservative&quot; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &quot;conservatives&quot; advocate cutting taxes and you&#039;ll find out what  crock of &quot;self-defined&quot; shit that is.  On issues, which is all - as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &quot;policy liberal&quot; - I care about, this isn&#039;t a &quot;conservative&quot; country. And it&#039;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.

You&#039;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals&#8221;</p>
<p>  Bullshit &#8211; try pushing a &#8220;conservative&#8221; agenda through Congress, try cutting spending at the same rates knee-jerk, idiot idelological &#8220;conservatives&#8221; advocate cutting taxes and you&#8217;ll find out what  crock of &#8220;self-defined&#8221; shit that is.  On issues, which is all &#8211; as someone who is conservative in many respectives but a &#8220;policy liberal&#8221; &#8211; I care about, this isn&#8217;t a &#8220;conservative&#8221; country. And it&#8217;s getting less so every day as the epic fail of conservative bamboozlement plays out  as total and utter failure of policy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re being childish and dishonest if you think that crap can be passed off as a description of contemporary America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mavis Beacon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607831</link>
		<dc:creator>Mavis Beacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607831</guid>
		<description>&quot;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&quot;

I know I&#039;m totally asking for it here, but I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;eliminating polio and other plagues,&quot; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?

In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#039;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#039;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#039;d prefer.  Now, I don&#039;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#039;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#039;s all Anna&#039;s voicing then I&#039;ll add an amen, but if she&#039;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#039;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#039;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And please no knee jerk blather about the scourge of polio and other plagues having been mostly eradicated by vaccines.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m totally asking for it here, but I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;eliminating polio and other plagues,&#8221; as Anna so artfully puts it, was good.  Does that qualify as knee jerk?  Is it blather?</p>
<p>In my book the anti-vaccination folk aren&#8217;t any more impressive than the creationists.  They&#8217;ve both rejected science in favor of something they&#8217;d prefer.  Now, I don&#8217;t want to say that all vaccines are necessarily safe and that you shouldn&#8217;t be somewhat skeptical, so if that&#8217;s all Anna&#8217;s voicing then I&#8217;ll add an amen, but if she&#8217;s saying flatly that vaccines are bad, well, then she&#8217;s wrong and believers in science shouldn&#8217;t let it slide.  Let me add that where creationists are merely misinforming people, anti-vaccine zealots can be public health risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607826</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607826</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Huh?  What are you, some kind of socialist? Everyone knows that the world will be saved by free, unfettered Ayn Rand capitalism, and that this can only be achieved by doing everything possible to give the large banks everything they request.  Like, duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607824</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607824</guid>
		<description>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.

Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but even I am somewhat happy with Obama at this point, which is reflected in 69% of the population approving of Obama.</p>
<p>Even though I think that his economic team is going in the wrong direction, by thinking that everything will be solved by giving money to big Wall Street banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607822</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607822</guid>
		<description>Nevertheless, Obama&#039;s ratings run high while the GOP&#039;s are tanking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevertheless, Obama&#8217;s ratings run high while the GOP&#8217;s are tanking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607821</guid>
		<description>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   

Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans - 4/24/09 Poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pokey consideres of himself as a conservative independent.   </p>
<p>Independents outnumber Democrats or Republicans &#8211; 4/24/09 Poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pokey</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607820</guid>
		<description>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals

See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 -  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 52% MORE Conservatives than Liberals</p>
<p>See Randy Pauls link above, based on poll taken 4/24/09 &#8211;  Question 908a. Would you say your views on most political matters are liberal, moderate, or conservative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turmon</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/sick/comment-page-1/#comment-607819</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/?p=2671#comment-607819</guid>
		<description>How about two adjacent toilet stalls at the Ronald Reagan Memorial airport?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about two adjacent toilet stalls at the Ronald Reagan Memorial airport?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

