AVODART FOR SALE
No poofters AVODART FOR SALE, among this sweaty bunch of fierce, manly soldiers. Where can i find AVODART online, That much you can bank on. At least none that were public. You know than men never had sex with men in the year 1356, AVODART australia, uk, us, usa. Australia, uk, us, usa, A comforting thought we've made zero progress on that front in, say, AVODART overnight, AVODART brand name, the last 7-800 years. And if such Real Men as John McCain have their way, AVODART images, Buy no prescription AVODART online, we will continue in the darkness. No matter that McCain has repeatedly said he was ready to scrap the absurd Don't Ask-Don't Tell policy as soon as U.S. military commanders said it was time, AVODART FOR SALE.
Today, AVODART without prescription, AVODART interactions, the top U.S. military uniformed and civilian officials -- Admiral Mike Mullen and Republican Defense Secretary Robert Gates -- declared that such a time had come, AVODART cost. Purchase AVODART online, And there was John McCain and the whole rest of the Republican pack saying no, no, AVODART street price, AVODART forum, a thousand times no.
Is there anybody at all in American politics today that has so squandered more of his moral capital that McCain, generic AVODART. AVODART FOR SALE, Here's a guy who really had a lot to admire some time back and now can be described as little more than a pathetic stumble-bum hack. After AVODART, He didn't even have the nuts to speak out forcefully against the gutting of his own campaign reform legislation by the conservative Supreme Court. Maybe, he's a poofter, real brand AVODART online. AVODART natural, P.S. Of course, where can i buy AVODART online, AVODART use, McCain has a growing base for his sort of unhinged politics. A new poll by Daily Kos reveals some pretty far-friggin'-out attitudes now popular among Republicans. Man, rx free AVODART, AVODART canada, mexico, india, it really IS like the Dark Ages. Move over, Sarah Palin and let's get some real alchemists and wizards on the next ticket! Here are some highlights:
- 39 percent of Republicans believe Obama should be impeached, 29 percent are not sure, 32 percent said he should not be voted out of office.
- 36 percent of Republicans believe Obama was not born in the United States, 22 percent are not sure, 42 percent think he is a natural citizen.
- 31 percent of Republicans believe Obama is a "Racist who hates White people" -- the description once adopted by Fox News's Glenn Beck, AVODART FOR SALE. 33 percent were not sure, AVODART alternatives, Purchase AVODART online no prescription, and 36 percent said he was not a racist.
- 63 percent of Republicans think Obama is a socialist, 16 percent are not sure, AVODART online cod, AVODART no prescription, 21 percent say he is not
- 24 percent of Republicans believe Obama wants "the terrorists to win," 33 percent aren't sure, AVODART pics, AVODART schedule, 43 percent said he did not want the terrorist to win.
- 21 percent of Republicans believe ACORN stole the 2008 election, 55 percent are not sure, AVODART gel, ointment, cream, pill, spray, continuous-release, extended-release, Online buying AVODART, 24 percent said the community organizing group did not steal the election.
- 23 percent of Republicans believe that their state should secede from the United States, 19 percent aren't sure, get AVODART, 58 percent said no.
- 53 percent of Republicans said they believe Sarah Palin is more qualified to be president than Obama.
- Still tabulating the percentage who believes the world is flat (waiting for the late returns from Wasilla).
P.P.S. Talking about politicians living on Mars or in some twisted time warp... as Health Care in any form, even the most-watered down form, begins to sink below the horizon, the Democratic Progressive Caucus made a tragi-comic stab today to revive the public option! Fantastic. We can't even get the House to pass the crappy Senate bill (which would be a whole lot better than the current void) and now we have a letter from progressives saying there should be a separate bill mandating a public option. In that case, why not a separate bill for single payer. They have equal chances of passage -- zero.
Is everyone into game playing rather than getting something done. And then you wonder why Americans don't give two flips about politics.
---------------------------------------------------------
Follow me on Twitter by clicking here.
Neon Tommy | Promote Your Page Too
Similar posts: BUY NORDIAZEPAM NO PRESCRIPTION. NORVASC FOR SALE. BUY LEVLEN NO PRESCRIPTION. About ZITHROMAX. Get RULIDE. Order EPIVIR from mexican pharmacy.
Trackbacks from: AVODART FOR SALE. AVODART FOR SALE. AVODART FOR SALE. Order AVODART from United States pharmacy. Comprar en línea AVODART, comprar AVODART baratos. AVODART interactions.
February 2nd, 2010 at 7:58 pm
And then you wonder why Americans don’t give two flips about politics?
What idiocy. The whole reason that nearly 100 House members signed this letter is because they’ve been inundated with pleas from their constituents to support a public option.
February 2nd, 2010 at 8:39 pm
Great lead topic, Marc. Really glad you put this column together. I refuse to pay for cable at home, but since I’m on the road, I’m taking advantage of the cable that comes with the joint where I staying. Caught the very revealing and riveting C-SPAN coverage of Sec. Gates & Adm. Mullen before the Senate Armed Services Committee you mention above. Really great stuff.
I think you’re dead on regarding Sen. McCain. The guy is really starting to lose it. If Republicans like McCain are going to draw the line in the stand and say no to gay military service members, then they ought to have the courage of their convictions and demand the U.S. refuse all military alliances with Great Britain and Canada in our mission in Afghanistan. I’m waiting for McCain and the GOP to tell us that the horror of gay Tommy’s and Canadian lesbians serving on the front with our soldiers and marines is an unimaginable and intolerable condition that our brave troops should not have to endure. Sorry Afghanistan. Would love to help you stand up to the evil Taliban and al Quaeda, but that trooper from Winnipeg might be ‘playing within the same conference’ when he’s not on duty.
February 2nd, 2010 at 8:56 pm
Opps, must have been a Freudian slip of the tongue…
Sec. Gates just answered a question from Sen. Levin, referring to our NATO allies as ‘partners’…
February 3rd, 2010 at 3:55 am
It gets worse, much worse.
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:20 am
Early draft of the Constitution found in Phila.
And, there it was, clear as day. Every citizen has a Constitutional right to medical care, and the government can force you, under threat of imprisonment and fines, to buy health insurance. Well, it wasn’t that clear, but you could read between the lines to see that our founding fathers intended that.
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:21 am
Let homosexuals have their way in the military and the new Marine slogan will be “Make Love. Not War.”
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:38 am
One last thing…. I really don’t know if Obama was born in the U.S. Complete and accurate birth certificates have been maintained long before Obama joined the world, yet the only evidence provided of his alleged Hawaiian birth is a dummied up and uncertified copy of a birth record. That is not proof and doesn’t do it for someone who performs audits and shows reasonable skepticism.
Getting a copy of an original birth certificate from a courthouse usually runs less than $10, but Obama has spent about $2 million more than that on lawyers to fight requests for it. Why that wouldn’t make one wonder is a greater mystery than having some doubt.
You guys were more skeptical of Bush’s service in the Air National Guard and were willing to accept “fake but accurate” evidence; i.e., a “type written” letter prepared on MS Word.
Is it some Republicans or you who have “pretty far-friggin’-out attitudes?”
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:48 am
Thanks for that Randy – it’s clear the Family Research Council is nothing but a hate group, like the White Citizens Council. The WCCs were the “civil” face of the Klan, just like the FRC is the “civil” face of guys who beat up or murder gays.
Rob – I think “McCain is really starting to lose it” might be a late diagnosis. Not to put too fine a point on it, but when McCain chose and defended his choice of the ridiculous Ms. Palin as his understudy, he pretty much had 100% lost it. All we’re looking at now is the hollow shell of John McCain – a man who apparently was willing to do to himself, out of raw ambition, what his captors were not able to do breaking his bones as a POW. Any dignity, honor or integrity the man could lay claim to went down the tubes in 2008. He gave the most despicable, insane wing of the GOP he claimed to dismiss and distance himself from in 2000 – the Falwell/Robertson KnowNothings – their absurd Evita.
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:19 am
Of course, everyone in the South knows that members of the White Citizens Councils were all Democrats, a party with a sordid history that tries to hide it by pointing fingers at others.
And, how can anyone take seriously people who attack an organization holding to high moral standards by claiming that it is a “terrorist organization?” Right. Someone against homosexuals ogling soldiers in the showers is the same as the people who killed 3,000 on 9-11. You guys are so over the top. You’ve lost all sanity and any sense of objectivity.
Speaking of “dark ages,” there’s no light being allowed on this: Fate of Obama’s aunt to be fought behind closed doors.
Obama’s administration must be transparent because, although a lot is hidden, I can see right through it.
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:24 am
“One last thing…”
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:36 am
Agreed. “…starting to lose it.” should have been typed out as “…has really lost it.”
Or even
Has lose it so badly that his having lost it is doing laps.
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:42 am
Speaking of “losing it” can anyone figure out what the second paragraph in Woody’s insane rant at 7:19 refers to ? He seems to be flailing even more than usual.
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:50 am
Fascinating Chris Matthews interview:
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/35703_Family_Research_Council_Spokesman-_Gay_Behavior_Should_Be_Outlawed
If you don’t have time to listen to the whole thing, skip to the final 30 seconds or so when Peter Sprigg of the “Family Research Council” (whatever that is) overtly expresses that “gay behavior should be outlawed.”
Wow. Incredible.
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:20 am
Well, duh–I obviously didn’t click on Randy’s link to the same interview! Sorry about the duplication.
Of course, it’s so outrageously nutty I think it deserves a double-post.
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:30 am
I don’t get holding up McCain’s former self to his current self as proof that the man’s character has altered. There has been much written about the fact he was always a shit…and during captivity was not admired by his comrades and supposedly sang like a bird. When he came home he dumped his once beautiful wife who had been maimed in a catastrophic accident. His behavior even enraged the Reagans!
From anything I can gather he has always been the spoiled, shallow, opportunisitc fuck up with a bit of a millstone of a father and “expectations” around his neck.
Ptui.
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:34 am
“Good grief,” said Charlie Brown. Believing anything a poll in Daily Kos is as brilliant as believing anything a poll from the RNC. How unbelievable!
I served, I served with at least a couple of gays that I knew about and they were fine soldiers. You and everyone else, left and right need to get off this bandwagon and recognize that gay’s are as patriotic as anyone, and just because someone doesn’t buy into that is no reason to doubt their sanity or patriotism. Back off, let the issue go and let the military implement any plan that they are comfortable with as espoused by the CJCoS. I would also remind all of you, left and right that “DADT” does NOT keep gay’s out of the military. It only says don’t make an issue of your sexuality, the same that applies to the behavior of the hetero’s.
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:34 am
“The conservative movement, to which I subscribe, has as one of its basic tenets the belief that government should stay out of people’s private lives. Government governs best when it governs least – and stays out of the impossible task of legislating morality. But legislating someone’s version of morality is exactly what we do by perpetuating discrimination against gays.”
Above excerpt comes from former Sen. Barry Goldwater:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/user/scotts/OldFiles/bulgarians/barry-goldwater.html
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:42 am
I think you’re probably right, AC, but McCain managed to create this aura around himself with the press and he took a lot of shots from Karl Rove in 2000 for not being as consistent a douchebag as W. I also give him the benefit of the doubt on his POW experience. So whether the carefully crafted McCain image ever had much in the way of “authenticity”, he’s shown himself to not even bother anymore with trying to look like he’s not just another wingnut.
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:50 am
“the same that applies to the behavior of the hetero’s”
Yeah, those heteros in the military are also living under the weight of keeping their personal lives a secret. This is very stressful. I think the solution to issues like are gays and heteros equal under the Constitution is for everyone to just drop the messy “person” facade and incorporate themselves. Then, even if you sold a majority of shares in yourself to a Saudi Shiek, no one could question your identity. We’d all just be “American.”
February 3rd, 2010 at 9:00 am
“It only says don’t make an issue of your sexuality, the same that applies to the behavior of the hetero’s.”
Patently false. DADT disallows disclosure of one’s sexual orientation, but only if you are homosexual. Heterosexuals are not limited in this regard at all, and so DADT does not apply similarly to restrict heterosexual behavior.
As a matter of fact, I agree wholeheartedly with the “back off” sentiment–unfortunately, folks like the “Family Research Council” would rather not. Back off the obsessions with orientation: everyone–civilians and military personnel alike–all know that gays have been, currently are, and always will be in the military. Stop the stupid charade of DADT, stop pretending it’s doing anything productive (to the contrary), stop fixating on sexual orientation, and let our military continue being the best in the world.
February 3rd, 2010 at 9:12 am
That wild-eyed commie Bruce Bartlett who worked as a “supply-side” economic advisor to Ronald Reagan also seems to buy the Research 2000 poll as a valid guage of GOP insanity:
http://capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/bruce-bartlett/1467/why-i-am-not-republican
February 3rd, 2010 at 10:05 am
Reg Hoakster would have trouble being more wrong on this topic. This is a civil rights issue. This is about being fully recognized citizens–nothing less. There is something really sinister about defending DADT on the grounds that gay people can still go into the military. That’s true, I guess, as far as it goes, but it’s still a policy that robs people of their full personhood. Something we should all be against.
Let’s pretend for a moment that you’re a Christian and that DADT was directed at Christians, and there was this widespread cultural animus towards your beliefs. I imagine that your attitude would be very different. I think you would be deeply offended, and I suspect that if anyone were to tell you to just wait it out, and let the military figure out what works, that you would think that person suffered from an enormous failure of empathy.
Telling the left and the right to get off the bandwagon as if the two positions were just equivalent annoyances is, at the least, tone deaf, and at the worst, stupid. Sorry to have to say it. One side is fighting for full civil rights, and the other side thinks fags don’t deserve them. There is a massive qualitative moral difference there that you might want to get hip to.
February 3rd, 2010 at 10:26 am
Dan O – you posit a widespread cultural animus toward Christians as a hypothetical when in fact WalMart greeters have joined forces with the ACLU in relentelessly attempting to drive Christianity underground. (I heard it on FOX News…)
February 3rd, 2010 at 11:53 am
“Reg Hoakster” is, like all right wingers, a moron and an asshole and, like Woody, isn’t worth the time of day. Any blogger who respected his readers would ban both of these scumbags.
February 3rd, 2010 at 11:58 am
Hey Marc, Great politics as usual, but I would admonish you not to use derogatory terms for gay men (poofter, etc.) as synonyms for weak, gutless, etc. That perpetuates a stereotype of gay men (moi, e.g.) as weak and “less” than masculine. (Ditto for use of words for testicles as synonyms for strength and guts.) Small matter, but I know you believe in the power of language. Ciao for now.
February 3rd, 2010 at 12:11 pm
DADT disallows disclosure of one’s sexual orientation, but only if you are homosexual.
The law refers to anyone who “demonstrate(s) a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts”, which is a rather broad notion of “disclosure”.
February 3rd, 2010 at 12:15 pm
Marc and Woody go nicely together here, as usual. “Some pretty
friggin far out attitudes” it is discovered. Yeah, the Republicans
just went nuts as soon as Obama was elected. John McCain was
a real stand up guy back when he was making schoolyard jokes
about Chelsea Clinton-a crudely embarrassing incident which
in a fair world would have ended his career. Instead, the
fools of chattering class made him a hero.
Gosh, who the ball and ran with it on gays in the Military
twenty years ago? And what did it get him? A lot of
contempt and low marks for “leadership” from Cooper,
that what. But everything’s changed NOW.
Horton, don’t hold your breath on Woody getting banned,
for that you have to say something remotely nice about
Clinton.
February 3rd, 2010 at 12:28 pm
The Roman army was just one big faggot fest. I doubt anyone every questioned their balls or guts. Greeks just another bunch of pervs…for fucks sakes arguing over the US Military finally coming out of the closet. Giving oxygen to all these lunatic, atavistic and peculiarly American ideas about “acceptable” behavior only encourages the bastards.
I worked with someone who was in the military during Korean war. He said at that time no one bothered if someone was gay it was just pretty much ignored. Different era when there was not the luxury of being an asshole. Pun not intended. Though I am sure incidents may have occurred during WW2-Korea one imagines that given everyone was in the shit together and the times were such that “such things” weren’t openly acknowledged people just got on with life.
Anyone who thinks the military isnt just one big homoerotic playground is deluded.
February 3rd, 2010 at 12:28 pm
Oh c’mon b4. Banning?
Sometimes it’s just too much fun mopping the floor with these guys.
February 3rd, 2010 at 12:39 pm
“Anyone who thinks the military isnt just one big homoerotic playground is deluded.”
Wow! If that’s the case, maybe it explains Johnny McCain’s stake in “Don’t ask. Don’t tell.”
February 3rd, 2010 at 1:17 pm
You know, one aspect of expelling gays from the military hasn’t been talked about much. And that is that being *gay* served as a handy little administrative mechanism to expedite discharges. Way it worked was that if there was a problem soldier or more often if some trooper had reservations about being in the service–i.e. was about to be sent to a combat zone or an undesirable base–one could play the ‘gay card.’ Amazing how the slow gears of military bureaucracy suddenly shifted up into overdrive to remove a gay service member. Often required getting ‘caught in the act’ or making an over the top advance on another soldier. Didn’t work all the time, and there was the risk that if you tried this manoeuvre and it backfired, then one’s remaining military term was going to be hell. In essence, it was a trick by heterosexuals to fake their way out of the service.
February 3rd, 2010 at 2:21 pm
regHoakster is just a run-of-the-mill guy spouting some asinine talking points. He hasn’t done any of the really nasty shit Woody does. When he posts something akin to Woody’s recent racist babble on the Negro Leagues Museum – like maybe suggesting that if Lehman Brothers hadn’t been run by Jews they’d still be in business – I’ll get pissed enough to want to see him out of here.
February 3rd, 2010 at 3:40 pm
And here I thought the dark ages were over when the Church commuted Galileo’s conviction for heresy back in the ’90′s.
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:20 pm
Does anyone other than me realize how flawed the Kos poll was? Am I the only one to watch Bill O’Reilly?
February 3rd, 2010 at 6:48 pm
reg: …can anyone figure out what the second paragraph in Woody’s insane rant at 7:19 refers to ?
For starters, Randy Paul linked Chris Matthew’s attack on the Family Research Council. The post was titled “The American Taliban.”
Going further back, Obama’s Homeland Security released an intelligence(?) briefing accusing tea party protesters and opponents of Obama’s policies of being potential terrorists.
Your favorite left-wing media wackos like Mike Malloy, politicians like California House Speaker Karen Bass (D), Obama consultant Pete Giangreco, the Democratic Underground, and Obama himself have often referred to conservatives and conservative talk show hosts as terrorists.
So, Randy’s link was the catalyst for the comment that considered other examples. Does that clear it up?
Don’t end sentences in prepositions or something bad might happen to you.
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:21 pm
reg, I was being ironic and not. There are a lot of weird, violent rituals some of which apparently include a group rape of a selected recruit.
You men get up to a lot of weird shit and the fact that throughout human history men spent a lot time together at war…part of the human story.
Also, while on the subject of group dynamics in mono gender cultural contexts…apparently in Saudi Arabia women go a bit mad always being stuck together.
Coincidental to this silly topic there happens to be doc on HBO at mo about gay couples and their children on a cruise. A lesbian mom (who divorced when her now near grown daughter was 3) told hilarious story about she and her partner and tot of a daughter going to restaurants and her daughter blurting out “we’re all lesbians here” finally, after causing some incidents as this was before it was cool to have two moms, she told her daughter that they were all ‘bowlers’ so she then would blurt out to the waitress “we are all bowlers here’! And of course the waitress would say ” ooh, I bowl, too”.
One of the stand ups providing comic relief on this cruise was a Jewish lesbian who said her kids have two Jewish mothers…wouldn’t you want to kill yourself?
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:35 pm
Woody – you’re a fucking idiot. Incidentally, Woody, the Taliban didn’t attack the Twin Towers. They merely provided incentive and cover for the terrorists who did. Sort of like people like you and Tim McVeigh.
Now go to hell, where you belong.
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:36 pm
I should have said, “Sort of like the difference between people like you and Tim McVeigh.” Sorry for the lack of nuance. Now that’s cleared up.
February 3rd, 2010 at 7:57 pm
“Does that clear it up?
Don’t end sentences in prepositions or something bad might happen to you.”
It’s a grammar myth. And you still contradicted it.
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:09 pm
In my case, I believe that “up” is a particle.
Since you’re calling me a terrorist, don’t show offense at any label applied to you. BTW, I noticed that you didn’t have the courage to make a comment on Celeste’s last post of today.
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:11 pm
Oops. First comment for Samuel and second one for reg.
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:23 pm
I didn’t call you a terrorist – just a cheerleader for hatemongers.
I didn’t read WitnessLA after congratulating her on her prize. I’ll go check it out and comment as I see fit if a cowardly little shit is yammering about “courage.” You’re a little weasel. Go to hell.
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:28 pm
Woody – I went ant looked at Celeste’s last post, which is about a police chief in Long Beach. What the fuck are you talking about ? Do you have the courage to comment on that ? Or is that just some sick pervert insinuation regarding a child porn post that is two down from her last ? Is that your game, you simpering little shit ? Don’t be a coward. Let’s hear what your referring to.
You’re a detestable little fungus, Woody. Worse than a troll.
February 3rd, 2010 at 8:52 pm
Marc, obey your leader. – President Obama Again Criticizes Trips to Las Vegas
February 3rd, 2010 at 9:15 pm
I notice that the peanut gallery spends all their time on my last two sentences of the comment above and not on the rest of it… I didn’t once say I was in favor of DADT, I only noted it didn’t keep gays out of the service any more than they were not in the service when I served some 40 years ago. Secondly, Hetero’s are not forbidden a sex life, any more than gays are. They are not allowed to make issues of it and to flaunt it on duty.
Geeze, are all you guys (b4, reg and a few others) really born that stupid, or do you work at it?
February 4th, 2010 at 12:01 am
I took a poll, 99.99% of Americans with a brain are sure Woody is an idiot. The others read G.M. Ropers blog and want to be as intellectual as Sarah Palin.
February 4th, 2010 at 3:03 am
“In my case, I believe that “up” is a particle.”
Irrelevant. The preposition at the end of a sentence “rule” is an archaic prescriptive device that is not a function of the grammar. Here’s a rule of thumb, however: if you can remove the preposition from its sentence-final position without it changing the intended meaning of the sentence, then you should. If not, you shouldn’t. In reg’s example, it would have changed the meaning and resulted in an ungrammatical sentence. Ergo, the preposition belongs.
February 4th, 2010 at 3:15 am
“Secondly, Hetero’s are not forbidden a sex life, any more than gays are. They are not allowed to make issues of it and to flaunt it on duty.”
I didn’t say anything about being “forbidden a sex life” (your words). Your second sentence is also unclear in its scope. Here’s what’s not allowed, straight from the bill:
“(15) The presence in the armed forces of persons who demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability.”
Can homosexuals talk openly about their same-sex partners and relationships? Heterosexuals can. Homosexuals cannot. This is the essence of my argument at 9:00:
“Patently false. DADT disallows disclosure of one’s sexual orientation, but only if you are homosexual. Heterosexuals are not limited in this regard at all, and so DADT does not apply similarly to restrict heterosexual behavior.”
Now, you can call people “really stupid”, or try a more productive response to comments.
February 4th, 2010 at 5:52 am
Who wants to be in a shower with gays checking you out, unless you’re gay yourself? From a military standpoint, one should be logically concerned about the effectiveness and unity of a squad that includes a homosexual not liked by one or more of the other troops. Also, it would bring in to question the safety of a homosexual on the battlefield.
As usual, common sense never was the strong suit of liberals. Political correctness is their king.
February 4th, 2010 at 6:05 am
“Who wants to be in a shower with gays checking you out, unless you’re gay yourself?”
You already shower with gays, if you shower in public places. And if you’re obsessing about who’s watching you in the shower, you’re either immature or gay yourself.
“one should be logically concerned about the effectiveness and unity of a squad that includes a homosexual not liked by one or more of the other troops”
I like how you throw “logically” in there, as if using the word magically makes your argument logical. That’s a pretty huge insult to our military troops to assume that their unity and effectiveness would be adversely affected because individual soldiers didn’t “like someone”. Good soldiers set personal feelings aside and focus on being good soldiers. Again, it’s a question of professionalism and maturity: I wouldn’t assume others are as obsessed as you are about homosexuals.
February 4th, 2010 at 6:16 am
Kyle,
Please e-mail me offline at randinho at yahoo dot com
Thanks.
February 4th, 2010 at 6:32 am
Kyle, ever hear of fragging?
February 4th, 2010 at 8:30 am
Kyle: if you’re obsessing about who’s watching you in the shower….
It’s not an obsession, but I don’t like it, any less than women who are spyed upon by strange men.
The shower room is an opportunity for voyeurism by homosexuals, and I remember as a kid at the YMCA how they just hung around (maybe a bad choice of words) in the locker room. The military is a good place for them to get their rear-ends kicked if they do that. It’s better to keep them out since they can’t be normal.
February 4th, 2010 at 8:39 am
Good news for some of you — Tax Court Allows Deduction for Sex Change.
February 4th, 2010 at 9:03 am
“Kyle, ever hear of fragging?”
Fragging has nothing to do with sexual orientation. Woody lives in a peanut shell.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragging
February 4th, 2010 at 9:23 am
Woody – you still haven’t noted what your comment about my “courage” referred to. Don’t you have the courage ?
February 4th, 2010 at 10:27 am
You call McCain a loser reg, but did he not yank the white flag of defeat out of Reid’s hand and carry the American flag across the Iraq finish line instead?
Was he not the driving force, the winner, of the Iraq war for the civilized world and the Iraqi people?
I believe he would considered a winner for all but the most invested in an ideology….and it’s leader.
Is your common sense and vision becoming calcified and cataracted by politic bias?
Don’t let it.
February 4th, 2010 at 11:21 am
Kyle and Jack, don’t you see the connection with the word “fragging?” If troops have been known to blow away superiror officers over problems with them, don’t think that it wouldn’t happen with guys who grab their crotches?
reg, you should know by now that I have plenty of courage. I say pretty much what I think without worrying about political correctness. I just don’t care to waste time with you.
Why don’t you simply put everyone’s minds at rest and affirm that you have no unnatural tendencies towards kids and that you’re not on a sex offender list? That should end it, just like Obama could have ended questions about him by producing a real birth certificate. Quit dancing around it.
February 4th, 2010 at 3:02 pm
“It’s not an obsession, but I don’t like it, any less than women who are spyed upon by strange men.”
The point is that mature people don’t obsess about it, or really think about it at all. The funny part is that you do, and seem to think men in locker rooms are taking an unnatural interest in your naked body. That’s kind of… weird. You might need a reality check if you think that’s the case, or consider a therapist (I’m serious about that–physical and sexual obsessions and delusions need to be addressed by a professional).
Of course, if men are constantly gaping at you when you’re naked, you might want to get that checked out. Or stop being naked in public. Actually, the latter, definitely.
February 4th, 2010 at 3:05 pm
Jim R – actually Jim, the main success of the surge was by paying off terrorists. McCain was grandstanding, and although we were lucky that Petraeus and a few others came up with a strategy that had some benefits, McCain was clueless. Also “victory in Iraq” is still a mirage. Read Tom Ricks book on the surge – The Gamble – and get back to me. Also I don’t thank guys who created so much death and destruction – really one of the worst military episodes in American history – for stumbling out of their insane strategy. The war in Iraq will go down as a big win for the Iranians and a total waste of lives and treasure for the US, despite all the spin.
McCain is an idiot when it comes to things military. His support of the war in Iraq proved he doesn’t give a shit about honor, decency or the guys who actually have to slog it out. If McCain had any sense, he would have fought for a winning strategy in Afghanistan and told Bush that the war in Iraq was a fool’s errand being hyped by scoundrels. And the sonofabitch didn’t even support Jim Webb’s veterans bill.
McCain is a weak, stupid little asshole, driven by resentments and opportunism at this point in his shoddy political career.
February 4th, 2010 at 3:08 pm
Screw McCain…he got where he is because his daddy was a bigshot in the airforce and his second wife is rich.
http://obsidianwings.blogs.com/obsidian_wings/2008/05/mccain-on-veter.html
February 4th, 2010 at 3:49 pm
http://www.eschatonblog.com/2010/02/come-back-johnny-mac.html
February 4th, 2010 at 5:53 pm
Yeah, unlike John Kerry, who never climbed on the backs of others.
February 4th, 2010 at 5:53 pm
Yeah, unlike John Kerry, who never climbed on the backs of others.
February 4th, 2010 at 7:01 pm
My Question: “Is your common sense and vision becoming calcified and cataracted by political bias?”
Reg: “McCain is a weak, stupid little asshole, driven by resentments and opportunism at this point in his shoddy political career.”
I thought as much.
February 4th, 2010 at 7:40 pm
And I didn’t even mention McCain’s DADT opportunism, in which he did an about face on his vow to support it if the generals did. He’s a weak little shit. Dishonest and doesn’t give a damn about the country, based on his willingness to put the idiot Palin in the #2 seat under a guy in his 70s. Despicable. Where’s your common sense ?
February 4th, 2010 at 7:47 pm
Jim R – are you aware that when Petraeus came up with the central “surge” strategy of paying off Sunni warlords who had been killing our guys and helping al Qaeda massacre Shiites in terror attacks, HE DIDN’T TELL PRESIDENT BUSH THAT WAS THE PLAN AND “JUST DID IT” ? That’s pretty scary in terms of the chain of command, but an indication of how little respect or trust Bush had as the “CoC” after several years of disastrous strategy in Iraq – the generals knew they were being “led” by an idiot.
February 5th, 2010 at 8:17 am
I want to post this outrageous abuse of power by the Obama administration before Woody does…I know he must be seething at this.
http://tinyurl.com/yl44yrf
February 5th, 2010 at 9:12 am
Shelby is absolutely right on the tanker bid. The plane that would be built in Mobile is a better value for taxpayers and far superior to the one proposed by Boeing and with which Boeing lost in the intial awarding. Then, Boeing got its lying, cheating political connections going and had the plane rebid wih specs favorable to it.
Now, this is an outrage! — Obama denounces hold tactic he used as senator
February 5th, 2010 at 9:59 am
I knew you would defend this shit…also predictable of you to offer up a dishonest link from a newspaper run by foreign political extremists. (Holds are common enough and used by many senators selectivey – Shelby is holdiing the entire nomination process hostage over his special interest. No comparison, unless you’re working for Sun Myung Moon and hate America.)
February 5th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
JimR – here’s one of those reporters who was in love with McCain back in the day, Dana Milbank, wondering what happened:
“McCain’s political mentor, the late Arizona conservative icon Barry Goldwater, became more idiosyncratic late in life, supporting gay rights and denouncing the religious right. The protege has gone the other way, shedding his idiosyncrasies and becoming reflexively anti-government, a conventional conservative. Last week, it was time for McCain to shed his views on gays in the military. A few years ago, he had said of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy: “The day that the leadership of the military comes to me and says, ‘Senator, we ought to change the policy,’ then I think we ought to consider seriously changing it.”
“At Tuesday’s hearing, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Mullen did just that, saying he thought lifting the ban was the “right thing to do.” Colin Powell later said the same. But McCain was enraged, hectoring the admiral at the witness table and challenging his integrity.
“A week earlier, the topic was the national debt, another traditional McCain issue. He had been a co-sponsor of a bipartisan plan for a debt commission. But just before it came up for a vote, he pulled out and aligned himself against the proposal.
“On a full range of issues, McCain has switched to reflexive opposition. His presidential campaign expressed “full confidence” in Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke; McCain voted against confirming Bernanke to another term. During the Bush years, former POW McCain fought against abusive interrogations; last week he scolded the Obama administration for inadequate interrogation of the underwear bomber. On immigration reform, another signature McCain issue, the senator has lost his tongue.
“Back in Arizona, McCain’s bombastic buffoon of a primary opponent has been attacking him for his “Washington agenda” and as somebody who has “been in Washington too long.” But it is Hayworth whose political career far more closely fits the current fashion in political Washington: constant partisan warfare, scorched-earth politics and legislative paralysis. The John McCain that I miss was a refreshing antidote to that Washington, one of very few in this town who could be the transformational leader we need to get out of this stalemate.
“Before writing this column, I reached out to many of McCain’s closest aides from the 2000 campaign to see whether they thought there still was such a man inside McCain. Most of them begged off, some saying they had lost contact with him or become estranged.”
December 31st, 2010 at 2:48 pm
Are you positive which you have the facts straight? I have read a variety of articles that contradict what you said here, so I do not know what to believe.
January 21st, 2011 at 9:11 am
Is anyone up? I am tired of reading, watching TV, knitting, and surfing the net….
January 26th, 2011 at 8:21 am
Very well written information. It will be valuable to anybody who employess it, as well as myself. Keep doing what you are doing – looking forward to more posts.
February 15th, 2011 at 6:53 pm
Informative story, bookmarked your blog in hopes to see more!