Are you seriously this stupid or do you just play a moron on blogs?

BTW, SDI doesn’t and never will work. You like to waste billions of tax payers money on it because St. Ronnie proposed it. Ronnie just got the idea watching a bad sci fi movie after he went nuts.

This, from an issues site covering Kirk’s campaign, may explain it: Ron Kirk on Tax Reform – No stance on record.

Obviously, Obama’s friends don’t know much about taxes–especially paying them.

Does it upset the Left that RNC Chairman Michael Steele doesn’t “act black”?

Wait! There’s more! Just another example
MSNBC Brings on Nation Writer to Bash Rush, Tout Limbaugh Error

“So, Ari, Rush thought he was quoting the Constitution. It was the Declaration of Independence. How embarrassing is that for him, especially the way he slammed the President?”

Of course, you didn’t hear anything about Clinton when he confused The Gettysburg Address witht The Constitution.

Who’s hypocritical?

Next….

HALL: So, does (Limbaugh) represent the mainstream Republican Party? Does he? Beyond that room in there? He’s a very powerful man.

MELBER: He seems to be very popular and it doesn’t seem that there are any members of Congress who will stand up to him.

You guys get your Obama talking points every morning and follow them like robots…or, is Obots?

Aryans? No, Marc, white U.S. politicians aren’t the product of Nazi Germany. Most came from families who came to America for freedom and opportunity and from families who fought and gave their lives to end Nazi oppression and Jewish persecution–despite your weak attempt to link them. There should be a little appreciation rather than hate and disparagement–especially from someone who is a Jew.

The old crop of politicians have governed better and wiser, especially percentage wise, than Stalinists of any color, of which the most powerful one in the world is currently black.

Liberals attack blacks, like Clarence Thomas, who “act white” or “don’t think black,” as if being a certain race requires you to think a certain way. Is no inviduality allowed, and everyone has to be part of a group?

Do liberals want black politicians to take away everything from producers because “it’s their turn?” Is that “acting black?” Is Obama “acting black” and giving away the spoils? It sure looks like it, and I’m sure that’s what you and others want “It’s your turn.” Right?

If one calls out the left on that, then “the race card” is played, which, essentially, you did. No wonder our Atty. General said that we are a “nation of cowards” concerning race discussions. Nothing can be discussed when the left is filled with hate and wants to shut up those with other views and to shout them down.

Now, if there are no suburbs to which one can flee from a high tax, big spend, welfare-state, irresponsible government, I guess there will be a backlash against those who put in Obama and a re-taking of America for our long-lasting values of freedom and freedom to succeed if one chooses–not Marxism. I’m a conservative, not a Republican, but there will be a backlash, and the Republicans will return stronger than ever.

But, you would rather keep blacks down on the Democratic Plantation by “taking care of them,” wouldn’t you? That’s not change. In exchange for their votes, the Democrats have been doing that for decades–and, not out of principle.

Maybe the early drug use of yours and Obama’s are having long-term effects of distorted perceptions.

So far, only because Jimmy Carter was in the last century and because we’ve only had eight years in this century with a lot to go.

But, Obama is the star of the new show “Welcome Back, Carter” and has done more lasting damage to this nation in one month than Bush did in eight years.

Obama effectively will bankrupt the U.S. with social waste and debt, as has been done in California, and his gutting of the military and SDI will expose us to new homeland attacks. As I said before, we did survive Bush. We can never repay the trillions that Obama is throwing away to repay political debts and buy votes, and the world will lose freedoms that the U.S. military has historically protected.

On hypocrisy, nothing matches that of the Democrats. However, Limbaugh doesn’t speak for me, despite the Democrats and media claiming that he does, and I never said that I want the President to fail. Oh, and, Reagan succeeded in spite of the Democrats–not because of them.

Obama has an incredible lack of understanding of economics and national security. If his goal is to screw up our nation, I don’t support him in that. If he is trying to make our nation better, I will support him–but, I have to see it first and, so far, I haven’t. In any event, I remain a patriot unlike the Left, which still scoffs at flag pins.

Obama, bad enough being like Carter, will be to our nation like Coleman Young was to Detroit. What is it that so many black politicians have a hard time governing. Do you think that it’s because they are elected based upon race rather than qualifications? Oh, yes, I forgot…Obama is not expected to govern, but to rule.

- – -

Woody from earlier: Marc, this may surprise you, but corporations are not people. Explain why we should tax an entity that is non-human.

Here’s a just published scholarly discusson against the corporate income tax.

The Non-Sense Tax: A Reply to New Corporate Income Tax Advocacy

Abstract:
This essay challenges recent attempts by influential scholars to rationalize the existence of the corporate income tax. The corporate income tax has long been considered unjustifiable on traditional tax policy grounds. The new justifications recognize that, yet argue that the tax is still desirable because it promotes other goals, such as improvement of corporate governance and restraint of undesirable corporate management power accumulation. The essay demonstrates that the existence and magnitude of these alleged benefits of the corporate income tax are doubtful. Yet, the essay argues, even if taken as correct, the recent rationalization of the corporate income tax cannot support its retention since it misses certain crucial steps in the analysis. …The essay goes on to explain the uncertainty that governs the economic analysis of the burden of the tax, which results in confusion and the inability to assess the fairness of the tax as a whole. This understanding should pull the carpet from underneath the very basis of the arguments in support of the corporate income tax. The essay concludes by asserting that the tax not only should, but also could, be repealed consistent with accepted tax policy principles.

Woody, my friend, this is NOT a serious discussion and you know it. You defend Republicans, period. Makes no different what is actually said.

I have no idea if Obama will “fail” or not. What I do know is that thanks to the last eight years of Republican administration, America is already in deep, deep failure. If the Dems had been in power over the last eight years you’d be yelling for impeachment.

Instead ur gonna write back now and say that the current deplorable state we find ourselves in is due to Democratic control of congress since 2006.

Save ur time and mine. If you really believe that then you would by the same logic have to take all the credit u give to Reagan and give it to the Dems– they, not the GOP, dominated congress during the entire Reagan era.

Anyway, it’s hard to imagine a failure a greater than the one bequeathed by the incompetent fools we finally voted out of office. GW Bush will go down in history as the worst president of the century. Roll over, Herbert Hoover.

Also let me mention in pasisng, the gross hypocrisy of your position and that of Limbaugh;s. You want America to succeed but the President to fail. I see. Arent u the same folks who said that those of who criticized Bush was effectively betraying American values and the troops? Man, what a crock.

Limbaugh doesn’t want Obama to fail in helping our nation. He just wants Obama to fail in what he’s actually doing to it.

Hey, Obama finally admitted that the surge worked. Talk about hypocrisy.

Now we have Limbaugh openly and actively doing much worse. He’s not being unfairly painted that way, as was the case before–he’s actually proud of himself. The modern conservative’s hypocrisy is unbounded. Luckily for saner people the country agreed and threw them out.

It’s all they’ve got.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/pelosi/jet.asp

So far, only because Jimmy Carter was in the last century and because we’ve only had eight years in this century with a lot to go.

But, Obama is the star of the new show “Welcome Back, Carter” and has done more lasting damage to this nation in one month than Bush did in eight years.

Obama effectively will bankrupt the U.S. with social waste and debt, as has been done in California, and his gutting of the military and SDI will expose us to new homeland attacks. As I said before, we did survive Bush. We can never repay the trillions that Obama is throwing away to repay political debts and buy votes, and the world will lose freedoms that the U.S. military has historically protected.

On hypocrisy, nothing matches that of the Democrats. However, Limbaugh doesn’t speak for me, despite the Democrats and media claiming that he does, and I never said that I want the President to fail. Oh, and, Reagan succeeded in spite of the Democrats–not because of them.

Obama has an incredible lack of understanding of economics and national security. If his goal is to screw up our nation, I don’t support him in that. If he is trying to make our nation better, I will support him–but, I have to see it first and, so far, I haven’t. In any event, I remain a patriot unlike the Left, which still scoffs at flag pins.

Obama, bad enough being like Carter, will be to our nation like Coleman Young was to Detroit. What is it that so many black politicians have a hard time governing. Do you think that it’s because they are elected based upon race rather than qualifications? Oh, yes, I forgot…Obama is not expected to govern, but to rule.

- – -

Woody from earlier: Marc, this may surprise you, but corporations are not people. Explain why we should tax an entity that is non-human.

Here’s a just published scholarly discusson against the corporate income tax.

The Non-Sense Tax: A Reply to New Corporate Income Tax Advocacy

Abstract:
This essay challenges recent attempts by influential scholars to rationalize the existence of the corporate income tax. The corporate income tax has long been considered unjustifiable on traditional tax policy grounds. The new justifications recognize that, yet argue that the tax is still desirable because it promotes other goals, such as improvement of corporate governance and restraint of undesirable corporate management power accumulation. The essay demonstrates that the existence and magnitude of these alleged benefits of the corporate income tax are doubtful. Yet, the essay argues, even if taken as correct, the recent rationalization of the corporate income tax cannot support its retention since it misses certain crucial steps in the analysis. …The essay goes on to explain the uncertainty that governs the economic analysis of the burden of the tax, which results in confusion and the inability to assess the fairness of the tax as a whole. This understanding should pull the carpet from underneath the very basis of the arguments in support of the corporate income tax. The essay concludes by asserting that the tax not only should, but also could, be repealed consistent with accepted tax policy principles.