<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: War Talk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:26:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: heath fuller</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-2/#comment-610170</link>
		<dc:creator>heath fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-610170</guid>
		<description>Can you provide more information on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide more information on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Doubt Ringtone</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-2/#comment-64851</link>
		<dc:creator>No Doubt Ringtone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-64851</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;No Doubt Ringtone...&lt;/strong&gt;

Every Day Is A Winding Road Ringtone Every Day Is A Winding Road Ringtone baby what did i do Ringtone baby what did i do Ringtone Why Did You Ringtone Why Did You Ringtone In Those Jeans Ringtone In Those Jeans Ringtone Ahh Lets Get Ill Ringtone Ahh Le...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>No Doubt Ringtone&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Every Day Is A Winding Road Ringtone Every Day Is A Winding Road Ringtone baby what did i do Ringtone baby what did i do Ringtone Why Did You Ringtone Why Did You Ringtone In Those Jeans Ringtone In Those Jeans Ringtone Ahh Lets Get Ill Ringtone Ahh Le&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: check credit</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-2/#comment-43584</link>
		<dc:creator>check credit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 01:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-43584</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;check credit...&lt;/strong&gt;

videotape.wacky incendiaries Shakespeare enthusiastic entry credit http://www.available-credit-report.com/ ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>check credit&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>videotape.wacky incendiaries Shakespeare enthusiastic entry credit <a href="http://www.available-credit-report.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.available-credit-report.com/</a> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-2/#comment-31114</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 04:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31114</guid>
		<description>&quot;The market place rejects losers&quot;.

But the losers can bribe the politicians (er, i mean donate money to their re-election campaigns) so they can get tax breaks, the federal gov&#039;t to take over their pension funding and other corporate welfare.

Ahhhh, America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The market place rejects losers&#8221;.</p>
<p>But the losers can bribe the politicians (er, i mean donate money to their re-election campaigns) so they can get tax breaks, the federal gov&#8217;t to take over their pension funding and other corporate welfare.</p>
<p>Ahhhh, America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-2/#comment-31099</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 02:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31099</guid>
		<description>Reg,

Great article. This president would probably accuse hs own parents of treason if Karl Rove felt there was an advantage to so doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reg,</p>
<p>Great article. This president would probably accuse hs own parents of treason if Karl Rove felt there was an advantage to so doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-2/#comment-31079</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31079</guid>
		<description>First,

&quot;The left leaning media&quot; = Mother Jones Magazine.
Which, by the way, was right when they said this war would be a disaster.

Secondly, this Administration can not be trusted.



Excuse me, I&#039;m back.
It can&#039;t be trusted to tell the truth about Iraq either.
Every time someone wants to support this debacle they talk about how time consuming and expensive it is to win this war.

They obviously forget the &quot;6 weeks, or 6 months, certainly not 6 years&quot; and the &quot;we won&#039;t need more than $1.5B to reconstruct Iraq&quot; talking points.

How many times do people need to be told to never trust authority?  They do what is in THEIR best interest, not yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First,</p>
<p>&#8220;The left leaning media&#8221; = Mother Jones Magazine.<br />
Which, by the way, was right when they said this war would be a disaster.</p>
<p>Secondly, this Administration can not be trusted.</p>
<p>Excuse me, I&#8217;m back.<br />
It can&#8217;t be trusted to tell the truth about Iraq either.<br />
Every time someone wants to support this debacle they talk about how time consuming and expensive it is to win this war.</p>
<p>They obviously forget the &#8220;6 weeks, or 6 months, certainly not 6 years&#8221; and the &#8220;we won&#8217;t need more than $1.5B to reconstruct Iraq&#8221; talking points.</p>
<p>How many times do people need to be told to never trust authority?  They do what is in THEIR best interest, not yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. York</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-2/#comment-31072</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31072</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s easier than consulting his own level of competence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easier than consulting his own level of competence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-2/#comment-31058</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 20:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31058</guid>
		<description>&quot;Keeping people uninformed and misinformed seems to be the intent of the left-leaning pressâ€“not that of the President.&quot;

http://www.prospect.org/weblog/archives/2006/03/index.html#009429</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Keeping people uninformed and misinformed seems to be the intent of the left-leaning pressâ€“not that of the President.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org/weblog/archives/2006/03/index.html#009429" rel="nofollow">http://www.prospect.org/weblog/archives/2006/03/index.html#009429</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. York</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-2/#comment-31035</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31035</guid>
		<description>I also reject thei perpetual &quot;occupation&quot; tag. NO one is trying occupy the place. We wouldn&#039;t take it as a gift. For this baseline of nonthought discounts anything the writer might say on its face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also reject thei perpetual &#8220;occupation&#8221; tag. NO one is trying occupy the place. We wouldn&#8217;t take it as a gift. For this baseline of nonthought discounts anything the writer might say on its face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. York</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31032</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. York</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31032</guid>
		<description>&quot; Do you remember chants from the left about a quaqmire?&quot;

Yup and we&#039;re in one big time. I listened to Bush&#039;s speech. He&#039;s committed and can&#039;t give proper weight to the reality so he spins it to the positive just like you do. Reality is much harsher than supporters dare to admit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Do you remember chants from the left about a quaqmire?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup and we&#8217;re in one big time. I listened to Bush&#8217;s speech. He&#8217;s committed and can&#8217;t give proper weight to the reality so he spins it to the positive just like you do. Reality is much harsher than supporters dare to admit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31031</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31031</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s impossible for anyone here to rationally reject the mission in Iraq with the limited information you have&quot;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1730427,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s impossible for anyone here to rationally reject the mission in Iraq with the limited information you have&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1730427,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1730427,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31020</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31020</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another view on Ralph Peters from one of those magazines where the old founding editor, from his comfy armchair in Connecticut, recently declared Bush&#039;s war a mistake and a failure. Damned pro-commie media elite who are always undermining America. Yes folks, a comment on Ralph Peters from the National Review&#039;s &quot;Corner&quot; blog:



RALPH PETERS IN BAGHDAD [John Derbyshire]

Ralph Peters, if you read closely, was riding around Baghdad in a Humvee. Security conditions in the city would not have permmitted him to stroll around on his own. That is three years into the occupation.

It&#039;s nice that the Baghdadis are driving their cars, running their businesses, and going to their jobs. Perhaps, after one year or two years, they got tired of sitting at home doing nothing. This tells us nothing about the future of Iraq.

Of course most Iraqis would like to live normal lives, and do not wish to be blown up. The same, I am sure, was true of most Russians in 1916, or most Germans in 1932, or most Iranians in 1978. This is facile stuff. Getting from what most people want, to a political order that will provide it, is some trick, as the history of the human race surely demonstrates. Can the Iraqis pull it off? Can we pull it off for them? Those are the issues.

Yes, I know, Rummy said it&#039;s going to be &quot;a long, hard slog.&quot; But --- three years into the occupation, and we still haven&#039;t secured the capital city? For goodness&#039; sake.

I find Peters&#039; columns increasingly irritating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another view on Ralph Peters from one of those magazines where the old founding editor, from his comfy armchair in Connecticut, recently declared Bush&#8217;s war a mistake and a failure. Damned pro-commie media elite who are always undermining America. Yes folks, a comment on Ralph Peters from the National Review&#8217;s &#8220;Corner&#8221; blog:</p>
<p>RALPH PETERS IN BAGHDAD [John Derbyshire]</p>
<p>Ralph Peters, if you read closely, was riding around Baghdad in a Humvee. Security conditions in the city would not have permmitted him to stroll around on his own. That is three years into the occupation.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice that the Baghdadis are driving their cars, running their businesses, and going to their jobs. Perhaps, after one year or two years, they got tired of sitting at home doing nothing. This tells us nothing about the future of Iraq.</p>
<p>Of course most Iraqis would like to live normal lives, and do not wish to be blown up. The same, I am sure, was true of most Russians in 1916, or most Germans in 1932, or most Iranians in 1978. This is facile stuff. Getting from what most people want, to a political order that will provide it, is some trick, as the history of the human race surely demonstrates. Can the Iraqis pull it off? Can we pull it off for them? Those are the issues.</p>
<p>Yes, I know, Rummy said it&#8217;s going to be &#8220;a long, hard slog.&#8221; But &#8212; three years into the occupation, and we still haven&#8217;t secured the capital city? For goodness&#8217; sake.</p>
<p>I find Peters&#8217; columns increasingly irritating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31014</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31014</guid>
		<description>Apology accepted</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apology accepted</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31011</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31011</guid>
		<description>For anyone who&#039;s not into linking a bunch of crap, here are my two favorite Ralph Peters quotes:

&quot;Media bias just might turn the future of Iraq into a disaster that will reverberate for decades.&quot;


&quot;As vile as Richard Nixon was, I&#039;m no longer certain that Woodward and Bernstein did our country a service.&quot;


Oh Woody...I&#039;m so afraid of subjecting myself to opposing opinion.  I&#039;m a.....(drum roll)....LIBERAL !   In the face of the towering intellect, moral courage and overpowering argument of   REAL MEN like RALPH PETERS  (remember - &quot;The New Glory: Expanding America&#039;s Global Supremacy&quot; is coming soon to your local bookstores)  my world might just collapse. Ooooohhhh....scary.  Now let me crawl back in my black hole and wait for this week&#039;s copy of The Progressive to arrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone who&#8217;s not into linking a bunch of crap, here are my two favorite Ralph Peters quotes:</p>
<p>&#8220;Media bias just might turn the future of Iraq into a disaster that will reverberate for decades.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;As vile as Richard Nixon was, I&#8217;m no longer certain that Woodward and Bernstein did our country a service.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh Woody&#8230;I&#8217;m so afraid of subjecting myself to opposing opinion.  I&#8217;m a&#8230;..(drum roll)&#8230;.LIBERAL !   In the face of the towering intellect, moral courage and overpowering argument of   REAL MEN like RALPH PETERS  (remember &#8211; &#8220;The New Glory: Expanding America&#8217;s Global Supremacy&#8221; is coming soon to your local bookstores)  my world might just collapse. Ooooohhhh&#8230;.scary.  Now let me crawl back in my black hole and wait for this week&#8217;s copy of The Progressive to arrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31010</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31010</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Randy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Randy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Paul</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31009</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31009</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Randy, you forgot to mention to Marc that I apologized for calling you a psycho &lt;b&gt;(even though there was some basis for such a statement.)&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

Why don&#039;t you apologize to me now for that comment?

Sometimes, Woody, you&#039;re just beneath contempt. I try to elevate the discourse, but you bring it back down to the gutter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Randy, you forgot to mention to Marc that I apologized for calling you a psycho <b>(even though there was some basis for such a statement.)</b></i></p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you apologize to me now for that comment?</p>
<p>Sometimes, Woody, you&#8217;re just beneath contempt. I try to elevate the discourse, but you bring it back down to the gutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31007</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31007</guid>
		<description>As regards your response to me above - it&#039;s bullshit. You made the statement that it was &quot;impossible for anyone here to rationally reject the mission in Iraq not knowing what Bush knows&quot; or somesuch. (The idea that you would defend the war on the basis of what &quot;Bush knows&quot; when it&#039;s clear he and his advisors knew very little, either about Saddam&#039;s &quot;threat&quot; or the nature of Iraq and how their &quot;dice&quot; could roll is rather remarkable on the face of it.)  Defend that claim or admit that my opinion of how craven and lowlife it is was valid. Don&#039;t dance around it and change the subject with stupid references to people you&#039;ve seen interviewed on Jay Leno and how all Americans are a bunch of ignorant slobs.  You are starting to sound awfully French - when you&#039;re not running away from your own ignorant, slobbish comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As regards your response to me above &#8211; it&#8217;s bullshit. You made the statement that it was &#8220;impossible for anyone here to rationally reject the mission in Iraq not knowing what Bush knows&#8221; or somesuch. (The idea that you would defend the war on the basis of what &#8220;Bush knows&#8221; when it&#8217;s clear he and his advisors knew very little, either about Saddam&#8217;s &#8220;threat&#8221; or the nature of Iraq and how their &#8220;dice&#8221; could roll is rather remarkable on the face of it.)  Defend that claim or admit that my opinion of how craven and lowlife it is was valid. Don&#8217;t dance around it and change the subject with stupid references to people you&#8217;ve seen interviewed on Jay Leno and how all Americans are a bunch of ignorant slobs.  You are starting to sound awfully French &#8211; when you&#8217;re not running away from your own ignorant, slobbish comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31006</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31006</guid>
		<description>http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec05/media_12-02.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec05/media_12-02.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/middle_east/july-dec05/media_12-02.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31005</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31005</guid>
		<description>Is this the same Peters who rode around Baghdad in a Humvee with the Army, saw no civil war and then chided the press for not getting out any more.  Please Woody. I&#039;ve read this guy&#039;s attack on the reporters and have read real journalists who&#039;ve been living this war respond to this phony.  Don&#039;t insult us by slinging his ideologically driven propaganda as the &quot;real deal&quot;  - it&#039;s just more of the stuff you ingest from that Kool Aid stand you hang around.

Peters
http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/64677.htm
response
http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/2006/03/no_civil_war.php


And if you have any doubts the guy who&#039;ll be on book tour soon with &quot;The New Glory: Expanding America&#039;s Global Supremacy&quot;  is a right-wing partisan ideologue with a rather overt agenda against the press - or anyone who questions the imperial dreams of the crazed neocons, not to mention their competence at pulling it all off - read this:

http://www.californiarepublic.org/archives/Columns/Peters/20051206PetersJournalism.html

I cite these Peters articles and a single response because no liberal in their right mind has anything to fear from more public exposure of the Ralph Peters of the world to the sunlight.   

Oh there&#039;s more...

Here&#039;s Peters on the &quot;liberal-scared-of-right-wing-opinion&quot; Newshour defending the practice of paying to have pro-American stories or &quot;the-war&#039;s-going-great&quot; stories planted in the Iraqi press.  Yeah. You can&#039;t trust the &quot;MSM&quot;.  Ralph-fucking-Peters to the rescue...riding on a military convoy.  Give me a break...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the same Peters who rode around Baghdad in a Humvee with the Army, saw no civil war and then chided the press for not getting out any more.  Please Woody. I&#8217;ve read this guy&#8217;s attack on the reporters and have read real journalists who&#8217;ve been living this war respond to this phony.  Don&#8217;t insult us by slinging his ideologically driven propaganda as the &#8220;real deal&#8221;  &#8211; it&#8217;s just more of the stuff you ingest from that Kool Aid stand you hang around.</p>
<p>Peters<br />
<a href="http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/64677.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/64677.htm</a><br />
response<br />
<a href="http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/2006/03/no_civil_war.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.back-to-iraq.com/archives/2006/03/no_civil_war.php</a></p>
<p>And if you have any doubts the guy who&#8217;ll be on book tour soon with &#8220;The New Glory: Expanding America&#8217;s Global Supremacy&#8221;  is a right-wing partisan ideologue with a rather overt agenda against the press &#8211; or anyone who questions the imperial dreams of the crazed neocons, not to mention their competence at pulling it all off &#8211; read this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.californiarepublic.org/archives/Columns/Peters/20051206PetersJournalism.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.californiarepublic.org/archives/Columns/Peters/20051206PetersJournalism.html</a></p>
<p>I cite these Peters articles and a single response because no liberal in their right mind has anything to fear from more public exposure of the Ralph Peters of the world to the sunlight.   </p>
<p>Oh there&#8217;s more&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s Peters on the &#8220;liberal-scared-of-right-wing-opinion&#8221; Newshour defending the practice of paying to have pro-American stories or &#8220;the-war&#8217;s-going-great&#8221; stories planted in the Iraqi press.  Yeah. You can&#8217;t trust the &#8220;MSM&#8221;.  Ralph-fucking-Peters to the rescue&#8230;riding on a military convoy.  Give me a break&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woody</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31002</link>
		<dc:creator>Woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/war-talk-2/#comment-31002</guid>
		<description>Final comment:  

-----

&lt;strong&gt;Myths of Iraq&lt;/strong&gt; - 03/14/2006
By Ralph Peters (Ralph Peters is a retired U.S. Army officer and the author of 20 books)
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/03/myths_of_iraq.html

&lt;em&gt;While there are and have been any number of courageous, ethical journalists reporting from Iraq, others know little more of the reality of the streets than you do. They report what they are told by others, not what they have seen themselves. The result is a distorted, unfair and disheartening picture of a country struggling to rise above its miserable history.&lt;/em&gt;

-----

It&#039;s better to read the complete article.  Do you really still believe that the MSM has presented a full and accurate picture of our mission in Iraq?  I can hardly wait to see how they handle Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Final comment:  </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><strong>Myths of Iraq</strong> &#8211; 03/14/2006<br />
By Ralph Peters (Ralph Peters is a retired U.S. Army officer and the author of 20 books)<br />
<a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/03/myths_of_iraq.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/03/myths_of_iraq.html</a></p>
<p><em>While there are and have been any number of courageous, ethical journalists reporting from Iraq, others know little more of the reality of the streets than you do. They report what they are told by others, not what they have seen themselves. The result is a distorted, unfair and disheartening picture of a country struggling to rise above its miserable history.</em></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s better to read the complete article.  Do you really still believe that the MSM has presented a full and accurate picture of our mission in Iraq?  I can hardly wait to see how they handle Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

