<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comments on: Weak Tea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Blog Title</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-641786</link>
		<dc:creator>My Blog Title</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-641786</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Title...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Title&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nook is The Best Device I Have Seen In A Long Time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: excercise game</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613776</link>
		<dc:creator>excercise game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613776</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;excercise game...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>excercise game&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Scenes from the Iowahawk Soiree [Dan Collins] was interesting when I found it on Tuesday searching for excercise game&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firm excercise</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-613633</link>
		<dc:creator>firm excercise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-613633</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;firm excercise...&lt;/strong&gt;

Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips &#124; Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>firm excercise&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Your topic Lean and Mean: Start-Up Tips | Internet Marketing Inc. was interesting when I found it on Saturday searching for firm excercise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christipher</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-576567</link>
		<dc:creator>Christipher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-576567</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Christipher...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christipher&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for the information. I will look forward to the next post&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-562888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-562888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Jessie...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jessie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alcohol withdrawal</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-519731</link>
		<dc:creator>alcohol withdrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-519731</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;alcohol withdrawal...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>alcohol withdrawal&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found it very useful. Thanks for the knowledge. I am personally trying to follow the advice &amp; try to be independent&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arab Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-417619</link>
		<dc:creator>Arab Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-417619</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Arab Real Estate...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Googled for something completely different, but found your page...and have to say thanks. nice read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Arab Real Estate&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Googled for something completely different, but found your page&#8230;and have to say thanks. nice read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350926</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350926</guid>
		<description>That satement is false. He didn&#039;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#039;s York. See definition of assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That satement is false. He didn&#8217;t post that assertion about the book in question. Roper is the one who brought it up, and some troll by the name of Jason Maine did it for reasons only he can know. You only assume he&#8217;s York. See definition of assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-4/#comment-350846</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350846</guid>
		<description>Okay last shot at York....Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay last shot at York&#8230;.Boyle/Yorkster why do you continue to flout your books here, under obvious pseudonyms, when its quite clear that no one interested. And a quick survey for folks here. Who here currently owns or even plans to read any of Marky Marks books?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350756</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350756</guid>
		<description>Their shared anti-semitism.

  (kidding)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their shared anti-semitism.</p>
<p>  (kidding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350745</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350745</guid>
		<description>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also why is it that Buchanan, James Baker, the Iraqi Study Group and Jimmy Carter are, when it comes to Palestine, all to the left of supposedly decent libs like RLC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350735</guid>
		<description>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC--I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yorkster/George Boyle definately has some issues to deal with regarding women, deriving from, i assume, a lifetime of failrues with the opposite gender. But onto more seriouis topics. JC&#8211;I know the Chomsky argument very well and until quite recently I bought into it. That US support for Israel can be explained vis a vis imperial interests therefore the role of the lobby is overblown. I still think it holds some merit. After the 1967 it was very convenient for US interests to support ISrael. They were a miltary power in an area wherre the US had strategic interests and could be called upon to beat up on third world people. Israel was and is a client state which armed US proxy governments in Latim America during the Cold War. Thing is, what if this is no longer true. Chomsky argues that once Israel no longer serves US capital and imperial intersts the US will drop its support and the Zionst lobby will disappear. This view, seems to me, quite absurd. If anything the Israe lobby would fight much harder for its postions. More so the Chomsly view underestimates the ways in which Israel and US interests are intertwined in poltical discourse. If Israel is so important to US imperialism and capitalism why are ruling class groups like the Iraqi Study Group and individuals like James Baker, isolationist like Buchanan, figures like Jimmy Carter, and foreign policy realists like Walt and company all calling for a more even handed and fair approach to Israel/Palestine? This to me makes no sense under the Chomsky model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350584</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350584</guid>
		<description>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i 

Female Score: 116
Male Score: 65

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keywords: yorkster i really do wish you luck in [your] attempt [to] publish yet another book i </p>
<p>Female Score: 116<br />
Male Score: 65</p>
<p>The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.bookblog.net/gender/genie.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Boyle</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350573</link>
		<dc:creator>George Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350573</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&quot;

Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#039;ve read, give it a rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark Yorkâ€™s lame work over at Amazon. Isnâ€™t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth [sic] reading.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right Ms. Ahmed, and these Amazon reviewers work for th Kirkus and The New York Times Review of Books? On behalf of Mr. York, who has done nothing to you from what I&#8217;ve read, give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcummings</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350204</link>
		<dc:creator>jcummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350204</guid>
		<description>Ahmed - just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#039;t understate the Lobby&#039;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse....I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen - capitalism, the will to power, for eample - other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmed &#8211; just out of curiousity, where am I wrong?  I don&#8217;t understate the Lobby&#8217;s power in terms of domestic policy, practicaully completely controlling the congressional and public discourse&#8230;.I simply state that one could easily look at recent events in US foreign policy and find a dozen &#8211; capitalism, the will to power, for eample &#8211; other contributing factors, aside from the Lobby itself.  M and W ignore oil, which is pretty crazy when you are analyzing mideast politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-350102</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-350102</guid>
		<description>Samuel Stott writes: &quot;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&quot;

Well, it&#039;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.

Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#039;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#039;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &quot;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#039;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#039;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&quot;

And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#039;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#039;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#039;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#039;ite threat.

Harkabi&#039;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samuel Stott writes: &#8220;By far, the most prevalent delusion in the world is that actors like the governments of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia, to keep the list short, and terrorist groups like Fatah, Hezbolla and Hamas, to keep this list equally short, are willing to tolerate the existence of Israel.  They say over and over and over again that they are not. Why do Westerners continue to think that these various Easterners donâ€™t say what they mean and mean what they say?&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, it&#8217;s pretty simple, Samuel: after literally decades of this kind of blistering rhetoric, flowing from nations that, in aggregate, have 50 times more cannon fodder and hundreds of billions in petrodollars to arm them with (with arms dealers at the ready, always, to supply them), Israel is somehow still around.</p>
<p>Which means that the continued existence of Israel must be convenient to their purposes.  This weird idea had strong support from one of Israel&#8217;s most astute military intelligence chiefs.  After years and years of reading the enemy&#8217;s propaganda about the need to destroy Israel (he was fluent and literate in Arabic), and waiting for the massive crushing blow that never came, I guess one day he smacked his forehead and cried, &#8220;Wait a minute: but this is all just *propaganda*!  I&#8217;ve been reading *propaganda*!  They *say*, but they don&#8217;t *do*.  So they must be saying it all for some other reasons!&#8221;</p>
<p>And he hatched this bizarre theory of Israel&#8217;s convenience to these despotisms, a theory that has absolutely nothing going for it except that it makes far more sense than any other theory you can think of.  As someone once said, once you&#8217;ve eliminated the impossible, whatever hypothesis is left might as well be considered the truth.  The weirdness of the idea is no strike against it in this context.  After, this is the Middle East we&#8217;re talking about here.  He felt that there was hardly any better strategy for weakening the hostile neighboring, and/or turning their attentions to some other convenient external enemy, than to go with the two-state solution.  Well, here we are today: with the Saudi royal family pressing its thumb down on the Palestinians to try to make two-state work, as they shift the focus to the Gathering Shi&#8217;ite threat.</p>
<p>Harkabi&#8217;s work is out of print in English.  Probably still closely studied in Hebrew, though, and perhaps there are copies in Arabic being secretively passed around in the corridors of power in Amman and Riyadh, in plain brown wrappers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349495</guid>
		<description>Jcummings isn&#039;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jcummings isn&#8217;t a defender of AIPAC even if he buys into a mechanical, narrrow marxist conception about how exacly the lobby works. As Phillip Weiss suggests, the fact that Chomsky does not seem to have a sociocultural or psychological bone in his body expalins why he sucked so much on the walt/ Mearsheimer issue. I dont agree that the lobby controls US foreign policy (IMHO it goes both ways) but I think that the foreign policy realists have made a substancial contribution to the deabte and people like Weiss and Judt have far more interesting things to say about the Israel lobby than Chomsky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349460</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349460</guid>
		<description>&quot;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€

Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t think even the most â€œextremeâ€ Hamas member even considers â€œthrowing the Jews into the sea.â€</p>
<p>Probably not unless it could be cooked up to 212F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reg</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349458</link>
		<dc:creator>reg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349458</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&quot;

Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and now Iâ€™m a defender of AIPAC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. If the shoe fits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/comment-page-3/#comment-349453</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 05:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marccooper.com/weak-tea/#comment-349453</guid>
		<description>I found these reviews of Mark York&#039;s lame work over at Amazon. Isn&#039;t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth reading. 

&quot;Sorry Mark, but this book needs some first aid. I decided to read it after reading the author&#039;s comments in a Rick Bass review. It reads like a stump-filled hillside, slipping, tripping, and falling all over the place. There is no sense that it was edited; there are mispellings,frags,story lines smashed to bits. Descriptions of the beautiful areas are adjective-free. There is also a lot of what I sense as &quot; doesn&#039;t play well with others.&quot; I&#039;ll stop here.............&quot;

and 

 Not something I&#039;d read again., April 14, 2006
Reviewer: Zack Shutt (Salt Lake City, UT USA) - See all my reviews 
Alaska Tales falls short of anything you&#039;ll be seeing at the local Barnes &amp; Noble anytime soon. The story is hollow and not worthy of making it&#039;s way onto the paper used to print this book. 

&quot;Overall: Yes, this was a story... but not one that I&#039;d recommend to anyone else looking for something to read. I&#039;d suggest that maybe some more crafty writing skills are picked up before attempting a second work. This one fell short of being anything decent.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found these reviews of Mark York&#8217;s lame work over at Amazon. Isn&#8217;t this guy banned? Anyways, the reviews are (unlike yorks lame attempts at fiction) woth reading. </p>
<p>&#8220;Sorry Mark, but this book needs some first aid. I decided to read it after reading the author&#8217;s comments in a Rick Bass review. It reads like a stump-filled hillside, slipping, tripping, and falling all over the place. There is no sense that it was edited; there are mispellings,frags,story lines smashed to bits. Descriptions of the beautiful areas are adjective-free. There is also a lot of what I sense as &#8221; doesn&#8217;t play well with others.&#8221; I&#8217;ll stop here&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>and </p>
<p> Not something I&#8217;d read again., April 14, 2006<br />
Reviewer: Zack Shutt (Salt Lake City, UT USA) &#8211; See all my reviews<br />
Alaska Tales falls short of anything you&#8217;ll be seeing at the local Barnes &amp; Noble anytime soon. The story is hollow and not worthy of making it&#8217;s way onto the paper used to print this book. </p>
<p>&#8220;Overall: Yes, this was a story&#8230; but not one that I&#8217;d recommend to anyone else looking for something to read. I&#8217;d suggest that maybe some more crafty writing skills are picked up before attempting a second work. This one fell short of being anything decent.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

